Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021860
Original file (20090021860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021860 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his narrative reason for separation be changed.

2.  The applicant states:

* he would like his narrative reason for separation changed because he is looking for a job and sometimes employers ask if you have served in the military
* he is clean of drugs

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 November 1979 for a period of 3 years.  He completed basic armor training and was awarded military occupational specialty 19D (cavalry scout).  He was enrolled in the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program on 2 February 1982 and declared a rehabilitative failure in the program on 5 April 1982.  On 23 July 1982, the applicant was discharged under honorable conditions (a general discharge) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 9, for alcohol or drug abuse.

3.  Item 25 (Separation Authority) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "Chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200."  Item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "JPB."  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry "alcohol or drug abuse (exemption policy)."

4.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation, in effect at the time, stated the reason for discharge based on separation code JPB is alcohol or other drug abuse and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A narrative reason for separation is not changed for the purpose of obtaining employment opportunities.

2.  Although the applicant contends he is clean of drugs, the narrative reason for separation used in the applicant's case is correct and was applied in accordance with the applicable regulations at the time of his separation on 23 July 1982.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021860



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021860



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001825C070208

    Original file (20040001825C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040001825 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty) be corrected as to his dates of service, his rank at discharge, and his Separation Program Designator (SPD) code. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011877

    Original file (20100011877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, the reason for his discharge be deleted from his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). The applicant's record contains a document, Subject: Commander's Declaration of Re-hab Failure, dated 5 August 1976, that states on 8 July 1976 the applicant was referred to the Fulda Community Drug/Alcohol Assistance Center (CDAAC) because of a triple positive urinalysis. The applicant's record contains an undated 20th Medical Detachment memorandum,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012825

    Original file (20060012825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s personnel records contain Copy 2, Copy 4, and Copy 8 of his DD Form 214. Copy 2, Copy 4, and Copy 8 were filed in the Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ). The evidence of record shows that the applicant was separated from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 for drug abuse in compliance with applicable regulations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003474

    Original file (20110003474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant subsequently enlisted in the U.S. Navy (apparently without disclosing his Army service) and received a general (under honorable conditions) discharge for minor disciplinary infractions. Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging Soldiers because of alcohol or other drug abuse. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019187

    Original file (20100019187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued confirms he was discharged with a characterization of service of honorable by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse. The regulation in effect at the time stated that SPD code "JPB" was the correct code for Soldiers separated under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse. The applicant's record shows he was discharged on 29 January 1980 under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003026

    Original file (20150003026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The available evidence shows he was offered an opportunity to get help for drug abuse and he elected not to complete the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program. __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000404

    Original file (20090000404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He requested a copy of his corrected DD Form 214 and found that the reason for discharge shows "drug abuse - rehabilitation failure." On 10 November 1983, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitation failure. On 27 August 1997, the ABCMR corrected the applicant's records by deleting from his military personnel and medical records any and all references to the urinalyses of the specimens he submitted on 4 January 1983...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027435

    Original file (20100027435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 November 1982, his commander notified him that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 9, for drug abuse rehabilitation failure. His immediate command recommended separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for drug abuse – rehabilitative failure. The evidence shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for drug abuse -...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008056

    Original file (20120008056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 8 December 1982, the separation authority directed the applicant be eliminated from service for personal abuse of drugs and alcohol in accordance with chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200 and that he be issued an honorable discharge. The applicant’s request to change his narrative reason for separation and separation authority based one misconduct offense was carefully considered and there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017293

    Original file (20120017293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he does not want people to know about his alcohol abuse. The applicant was accordingly discharged on 22 February 1983. His narrative reason for separation and corresponding separation code were assigned based on the fact that he was discharged for being an alcohol abuse – rehabilitation failure.