Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021332
Original file (20090021332.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  8 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021332 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his proper date of discharge.

2.  The applicant states that although he didn't serve his full term, he was in the Army for longer than 1 year and 2 months.

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 February 1991, was awarded the military occupational specialty of infantryman, and was promoted to pay grade E-3.
3.  On 11 March 1992, a local bar to reenlistment was initiated against the applicant.  The stated reason for the bar was his "present and past duty performance does not meet the standards established within this unit.  He has a disrespectful attitude towards his superiors and lacks military discipline and bearing."  The applicant was provided a copy of the proposed bar and given the opportunity to submit a statement in his own behalf, which he declined.  The bar was approved by the appropriate authority.  The applicant then stated that he did not intend to appeal the bar.

4.  On 12 March 1992, the applicant submitted a request to be discharged because he believed he was unable to overcome the bar.  That request was approved by the appropriate authority on 19 March 1992.

5.  On 26 March 1992, orders were published which show the applicant's date of discharge as 9 April 1992.

6.  On 9 April 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged due to a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment and was issued a DD Form 214 showing his date of discharge as 9 April 1992.  He initialed a document stating that he did not desire a separation medical examination on the same date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The date of the applicant's bar to reenlistment, his request for discharge, his waiver of a medical examination, and his discharge orders all support that the applicant was discharged on 9 April 1992.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021332



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021332



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023678

    Original file (20100023678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Cross Reference Table further states to assign RE code 3 for local bar to reenlistment (less than 18 years active duty service). Evidence of record shows the he received a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment 7 November 1992 for being a two-time failure of the APFT. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations, to include the RE code of 3 code assignment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010572

    Original file (20100010572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 December 1992, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 16-5, by reason of inability to overcome locally imposed bar to reenlistment. The regulation, in effect at the time, states the reason for discharge based on separation code “KGF” is “HQDA [Headquarters, Department of the Army] imposed bar to reenlistment; or locally imposed bar to reenlistment” and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013196

    Original file (20080013196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 November 1990. The applicant's RE code of RE-3 was properly assigned based on the fact the applicant received a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. However, the evidence shows that the applicant requested early separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5(b), because he was unable to overcome the locally imposed bar to reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003324

    Original file (20080003324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 November 1992, the applicant submitted a request to be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 16-5(b), due to his inability to overcome a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence shows that the applicant was voluntarily discharged under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008156

    Original file (20110008156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the narrative reason for separation of "locally imposed bar to reenlist" as shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). On 20 July 1993, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5b. Records show the applicant requested separation and indicated he understood he would be ineligible to reenlist at a later date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013231

    Original file (20110013231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "early release due to the convenience of the government" vice "locally-imposed bar to reenlistment." However, the DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was honorably released from active duty on 14 July 1992 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5b, by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005058

    Original file (20110005058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * reconsideration of ABCMR denial to remove his non-judicial punishment (NJP) of 4 September 1991and restore his rank and privileges * removal of his local bar to reenlistment and his request to be discharged be rescinded * change his separation program designator (SPD) and reentry eligibility (RE) code to reflect other than local bar to reenlistment * add the Army Achievement Medal with one Oak Leaf Cluster to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007066

    Original file (20100007066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a copy of his 1997 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), a copy of his January 1996 local bar to reenlistment, three character references, a 1991, 1992 and 1993 Army Achievement Medal, a 1995 and 1996 Army Commendation Medal, and a 1994 Academic Evaluation Report from the Fort Stewart NCO Academy. It notes that an SPD code of “LBK” is the appropriate code when enlisted Soldiers are being involuntarily discharged upon completion of their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013859

    Original file (20080013859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 that the applicant was furnished at the time of his REFRAD shows his narrative reason for separation was due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Once he received the bar to reenlistment, he submitted a request for early separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16-5b, and his request was approved.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016695

    Original file (20080016695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, amendment to Item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 16-5a, in effect at the time, specified that a Soldier denied reenlistment could be voluntarily separated before the expiration of their term of service due to a HQDA imposed bar to reenlistment. The evidence shows the applicant was locally barred from reenlistment...