Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021269
Original file (20090021269.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021269 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his flight records to show he completed 1020 instead of 816 combat hours. 

2.  The applicant states he flew as a military student pilot for 209 hours and as an instructor pilot for 1017 hours.  He also flew as an aircraft commander and first pilot, both in combat, for 1020 hours.  He would like his records corrected. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his USAAVNC Form 759-1 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate) for the period covered from 1 November 1970 to 30 November 1970, in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  Army Regulation 95-1 (Flight Regulation) covers aircraft operations, crew requirements, crew requirements, and flight rules.  The regulation specifies that each crew member must present his or her individual flight records to the unit of assignment.  The flying experience and qualification data for each rated crew member and flight surgeon in aviation service and each non-rated crew member will be documented on several forms among which are the DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate Army) and the DA Form 759-1 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate—Army).  The "Mission Data" column on the DA Form 759-1 lists a single character for the mission identification (ID).  During the Vietnam War, the following Mission IDs were used:

Mission Symbol
Service Missions
A
Acceptance test Flight
F
Maintenance Flight
S
Service Mission
T
Training Flight
X 
Experimental Test Flight
C
Combat Mission
3.  Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant's records show he was appointed as a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve and he executed an oath of office on 16 May 1967.

4.  His records also show he completed Phase I of the Officer Rotary Wing Aviator Course (ORWAC), at the U.S. Army Primary Helicopter School, Fort Wolters, TX, on 16 February 1968, during which he completed 110 hours of Total Student Pilot Time.  He also completed the ORWAC at the U.S. Army Aviation School, Fort Rucker, AL, from 26 February 1968 to 18 June 1968, during which he completed 99 hours of student pilot time for a total of 209 hours of "T" flights.

5.  From June 1968 to 29 February 1969, he completed 152 hours of flying time as follows:

* In June 1968; 7 "T" and "S" flight hours
* In July 1968, 17 "T" and "S" flight hours
* From 8 August 1968 to 9 September 1968, 43 "T" flight hours
* From September 1968 to November 1968, 22 "T" flight hours
* From December 1968 to 29 February 1969, 63 "T" flight hours

6.  He served in Vietnam from on or about 1 March 1969 to on or about 25 February 1970.  He was assigned as a weapons team leader to Troop C, 2nd Squadron, 17th Cavalry, 101st Airborne Division. 

7.  During his service in Vietnam, he completed 179 "C" combat missions, shown on various DA Forms 759-1.  A break-down of his monthly combat hours during his service in Vietnam is as follows:

Month 1969/1970
Aircraft Commander
First Pilot
Co-Pilot
Total
March 
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
April 
0.6
32.2
0.0
32.8
May 
0.0
68.0
0.0
68.0
June 
1.6
87.6
0.0
89.2
July 
0.0
110.8
0.0
110.8
August 
92.1
0.0
0.0
92.1
September 
41.1
0.0
0.0
41.1
October 
106.8
1.2
0.0
108.0
November 
73.0
2.1
0.0
75.1
December
78.6
3.7
0.0
82.3
January
79.9
2.0
0.0
81.9
February
32.0
0.5
0.8
33.3





Total
505.7
308.1
0.8
814.6
8.  His DA Form 759 for the period from September 1968 to June 1969 shows completion of 60 flight hours as an aircraft commander; 257 flight hours as a first pilot; 15 flight hours as a copilot; and 209 flight hours as a military student pilot, for a total of 540 flight hours, of which 190 flight hours was designated as pilot combat time. 

9.  His DA Form 759 for the period from July 1969 to February 1970 shows completion of 564 flight hours as an aircraft commander; 378 flight hours as a first pilot; 16 flight hours as a copilot; and 209 flight hours as a military student pilot, for a total of 1,167 flight hours, of which 816 flight hours was designated as pilot combat time. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his flight records should be corrected to show he completed 1,020 hours of flight time instead of 816.

2.  The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 1 March 1969 to on or about 25 February 1970.  During this period of combat service, he completed 814.6 (rounded up to 816 due to several fractions of hours) hours of flight time which is correctly shown on his DA Form 759, ending in February 1970.  
3.  There is no evidence in his flight record and he did not provide substantiating evidence that shows he completed more combat hours than those reflected on his DA Form 759.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  __x____  _____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021269



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021269



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021270

    Original file (20090021270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 4 April 1972 shows the Aviation Badge, Vietnam Service Medal, Air Medal, Defense Distinguished Cross, Army Commendation Medal, Purple Heart, Vietnam Campaign Medal with "1960" Device, and Bronze Star Medal. Therefore, he should receive 6 additional awards of the Air Medal based on his combat missions by subtracting 25 hours from his total...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014131

    Original file (20070014131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military record to show he flew a total of 584 hours of combat flight time. Item 30 of this form shows the applicant's grade as WO1. This administrative error was carried forward in Item 32 on Sheets 5-3, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, and 6-4; and Item 13 on Sheets 5 and 6 of the applicant's flight record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017139

    Original file (20110017139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with six bronze service stars. The evidence of record shows he served a qualifying period of service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Air Medal (32nd Award) for the period August 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018379

    Original file (20140018379.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the number of Air Medals was miscalculated * he was awarded the Air Medal (1st through 6th Award) * his flight hours in the Republic of Vietnam were 1,193 as a first pilot and 337 as an aircraft commander 3. He participated in various combat missions during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Air Medal with Numeral 16 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024572

    Original file (20110024572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records do not contain official orders awarding him the Aircraft Crewmember Badge or any additional awards of the Air Medal. USARV Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the award of the Aircraft Crewmember Badge and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015717

    Original file (20140015717.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he believes the Air Medal was requested around April 1971 but he never received it * he tried to correct his records in 1974 but again did not receive the award * in August 1974 he contacted the former Operations Officer for the unit with which he served in Vietnam; the Operations Officer had submitted the recommendation for the applicant's Air Medal * the Operations Officer provided a statement affirming the applicant's Air Medal had been requested * he is a life...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019281

    Original file (20130019281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During his service in Vietnam, the applicant completed various combat missions. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Air Medal (38th Award) for meritorious achievement while participating in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001262

    Original file (20130001262.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Special Orders Number 41 * General Orders Number 3512 (AM) with citation and certificate * DA Form 759-1 * Air Force Form 1256 (Certificate of Training) * DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) * DA Form 2962 (Security Termination Statement and Debriefing Certificate) * DD Form 214 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him an additional seven AMs (176 total missions divided by 25)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003992

    Original file (20120003992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 14 December 1971 to show award of the Air Medal (9th through 18th Award) * additional Air Medals based on the additional combat flight time he accrued during his second tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam * issuance of two "honorable discharge lapel pins" (properly known as Army Lapel Buttons) 2. He participated in various combat missions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000810

    Original file (20120000810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...