Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021252
Original file (20090021252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  27 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021252 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code be changed from an RE-4 to an RE-1.

2.  The applicant states that he was young and confused and did not know how to handle the situation.  He has now matured and would like the opportunity to right the wrong by completing a full term of service.

3.  The applicant provides a personal reference statement from his grandfather and pastor.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 20 June 2006.

2.  On 5 June 2007 the applicant departed absent without leave (AWOL) and he did not return to military control until 26 July 2007.

3.  The applicant's court-martial charges are not a matter of record.  However, on 3 August 2007, the applicant requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.

4.  The applicant's first sergeant interviewed the applicant and told him that he was tired of the Army and he did not want to remain on active duty.

5.  The applicant's request was approved by the appropriate authority.  Accordingly, on 10 December 2007, the applicant was issued a general discharge.  He was 19 years old at that time.

6.  The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows that he was discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 10, and that he was assigned a Separation Code of "KFS" and an RE-4.

7.  The reference statements provided by the applicant testify that the applicant endured trying times and circumstances in his early years and that his immaturity and peer pressure led to him heading in the wrong direction.  They believe he has matured and should be given another chance.

8.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program), then in effect, covered eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribed basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter included a list of armed forces RE codes.  Those RE codes include RE-1 which applies to individuals who were fully qualified for reenlistment when last separated.  RE-4 applies to individuals who are not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.

9.  The Separation Program Designator (SPD)/RE Codes Cross Reference Table shows that the SPD Code "KFS" is to be assigned an RE-4 code.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant departed AWOL because he was tired of the Army and requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.

2.  The applicant was no younger than other Soldiers who honorably completed their enlistment.  As such, his youth is not accepted as mitigating in this case.

3.  While the applicant has matured as he has aged, this does not form the basis for changing a properly assigned RE code.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021252



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021252



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003252

    Original file (20090003252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that, at age 17, on 22 March 2000, he was separated with a UOTHC discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial, under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. By regulation, the SPD code of KFS and an RE code of “4” will be assigned to members who are discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001168

    Original file (20110001168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states that the SPD code KFS is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006912

    Original file (20090006912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 22 May 2007, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005482

    Original file (20090005482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he will do anything necessary to have his RE code changed from an RE-4 to an RE-3 so that he can reenlist in the Army. On 26 June 2008, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and directed the applicant be furnished an UOTHC discharge, and on 18 July 2008, the applicant was discharged accordingly. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011092

    Original file (20080011092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The SPD code of KFS was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014222

    Original file (20110014222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry (RE) code as 1 vice 4 so he can enlist in any branch of the service without a waiver. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request was approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012025

    Original file (20080012025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his discharge request, the applicant acknowledged his understanding that by submitting a request for discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him, or of a lesser included offense therein contained which also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. An UOTHC discharge normally is appropriate for a Soldier who is discharged in lieu of trial by court-martial. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code KFS is the appropriate code to assign to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018347

    Original file (20080018347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of appropriate military records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow reenlistment. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides that when an individual is assigned a SPD code of "KFS" with a narrative reason for separation of “in lieu of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012338C071029

    Original file (20060012338C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ADRB can only change an RE code when it votes to change the authority and reason for discharge to chapter 5, Army Regulation 635-200, Secretarial Authority, which it did not do in this case. By regulation, RE-4 is the proper reentry code to assign members separated under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial, and who are assigned an SPD code of KFS. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002396

    Original file (20090002396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 March 2007, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. _______ _ _XXX______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.