Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021073
Original file (20090021073.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    15 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021073 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his discharge was based on medical conditions.

2.  The applicant states that he is trying to obtain Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical benefits.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214 and a letter from the VA.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  On 2 December 1975, the applicant was ordered to active duty for training (ADT).  He completed basic combat training and he was subsequently enrolled in the Power Generator/Equipment Operator/Mechanic Course.  Upon completion of his advanced individual training course, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 52B.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 June 1976 indicates that he was released from ADT under the authority of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) with a separation program designator (SPD) code of MCD.  His service was characterized as honorable.  He had completed 6 months and 18 days of creditable active service during this period.

4.  SPD MCD indicated that the applicant was released from ADT under the Reserve enlistment program upon completion of MOS training and 4 months of ADT.

5.  The applicant's service medical records are not available for review.

6.  The applicant provided an unsigned letter from the VA wherein it is inferred that a code [unidentified] on his DD Form 214 means he was separated from the service with a medical discharge.

7.  Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) paragraph 2-9 provides that the Board begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his discharge was based on medical conditions.

2.  There is no available evidence of record showing that the proximate reason for the applicant's relief from ADT was due to medical conditions.

3.  Notwithstanding the VA letter provided by the applicant, there is no entry on his DD Form 214 indicating that his separation was due to medical conditions.

4.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the applicant's separation from ADT was in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

6.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021073



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021073



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008414

    Original file (20090008414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show his characterization of service. Based on the evidence of record and the regulatory guidance, in effect at the time of the applicant's relief from ADT, he is entitled to have his record corrected to show his period of active service from 24 June to 23 October 1975 as an honorable characterization. In addition, the applicant's separation document lacks the required entries to accurately...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009131

    Original file (20130009131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the character of service and separation code shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. The evidence shows he was ordered to ADT and he was released from active duty upon completion of MOS training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080015386

    Original file (AR20080015386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was ordered to active duty to attend basic training (BT) and advanced individual training (AIT); however, his discharge document shows his service as “active duty for training.” He also states he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal for 90 days of active service during the Gulf War. Chapter 1 (General), paragraph 1-3 (DD Form 214 - Report of Separation from Active Duty), states a DD Form 214 will be issued to all personnel at time of retirement,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010241

    Original file (20120010241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 and all other available service documents contained in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), list the spelling of his middle name as "Lenard" or "Lenord." The evidence shows his date of enlistment and date of entry on active duty are correctly shown on his DD Form 4 and DD Form 214, respectively. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011876

    Original file (20100011876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was honorably discharged for medical reasons. The applicant provides: * DD Form 785 (Record of Enrollment from Officer Candidate - Type Training) * Form 214 * Line of Duty Determination * Physical Disability Separation Memorandum * U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) discharge orders * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Administrative relief from training memorandum * Orders releasing him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005899

    Original file (20080005899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016736

    Original file (20120016736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 1989 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an honorable characterization of service and a reenlist eligibility (RE) code other than "NA." Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administration Separations) states a member of a Reserve component (RC) who is not on active duty or who is serving under a call or order to active duty for 180 days or less begins entry-level status upon enlistment in an RC. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003154

    Original file (20150003154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) by reason of having completed his required active service. A Soldier enlisted or ordered to active duty normally will be discharged or released from active duty on the date he/she completes the period for which enlisted or ordered to active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020265

    Original file (AR20120020265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates she was released from initial active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with her service described as uncharacterized. Following completion of the MOS training course, the applicant was released from active duty with an effective date of 18 April 2003, and transferred to 352d Combat Hospital, Oakland, CA, to continue her service in the U.S. Army Reserve. Army Regulation 635-200 stipulates...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001263

    Original file (20100001263.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 July 1978, he was counseled by his unit commander and indicated that he desired a discharge. On 25 July 1978, his immediate commander advised him that he intended to recommend that he be discharged from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 5-33 (Trainee Discharge Program (TDP)) of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason of inability to adapt socially or emotionally to military life. At the time he was ordered discharged, the applicant was a member of the U.S....