Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020924
Original file (20090020924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020924


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he was an infantryman vice a clerk-typist.

2.  The applicant states he served with the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV), 23rd Infantry.  He wore all of the ribbons and insignia of the infantry.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 August 1965 and he served until he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee on 12 May 1967.

3.  The applicant's records contain a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) that shows he attended the 8-week clerk-typist course at Fort Leonard Wood, MO and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 71B (Clerk-Typist).  It also shows the following record of assignments:

9 August 1965
USA Reception Station, Fort Knox, KY
23 August 1965
Basic Combat Training, Fort Knox, KY
1 November 1965
Basic Army Administration, Fort Leonard Wood, MO
29 December 1965
Service Company, US Army Signal Center, Fort Gordon, GA
7 May 1966
Arrival in Vietnam
14 May 1966
Security Guard, Advisory Team 32, II Corps Advisory Group, MACV
11 May 1967
US Army Personnel Center, Oakland, CA
12 May 1967
Honorable Separation
4.  During his assignment as a security guard, the DA Form 20 shows he performed duties in MOS 11B (Infantryman), but it also shows he was never awarded MOS 11B.

5.  There are no orders in the applicant's records awarding him the 11B MOS.

6.  Special Orders Number 353, Headquarters, United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, dated 21 December 1966, promoted the applicant from private first class (PFC/E-3) to specialist four (SP4/E-4) in MOS 71B.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his/her military service.  It is important that information entered on the form be complete and accurate.  This regulation specifies that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  The 
DD Form 214 is prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  Item 25 of the DD Form 214 reflects military occupational specialties.  This Item contains the Soldier's primary MOS code and title, not any duty MOSs in which the Soldier may have served.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant wants his MOS changed on his DD Form 214 to show he was an infantryman.
2.  The applicant did not attend infantry advanced individual training; he attended clerk-typist training.  He was never awarded MOS 11B except as a duty MOS when he was assigned as a security guard with Advisory Team 32, II Corps Advisory Group, MACV. 

3.  The applicant was promoted while in Vietnam.  He was promoted in MOS 71B.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020924



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020924



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002783

    Original file (20090002783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which confirm he was ever awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002326C070206

    Original file (20050002326C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, item 38 (record of assignments) on his Department of the Army Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains a penciled entry replacing his typed duty MOS (military occupational specialty) of 71B20 with a duty MOS of 11E and a handwritten principal duty title of "tank armored" over the typed entry of clerk typist. The evidence confirms the applicant did hold an infantry specialty, was assigned to a cavalry unit, was wounded as a result of hostile actions, and the statement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014947

    Original file (20090014947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge in the applicant's service personnel records. Headquarters, United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam General Orders Number 2299, dated 1 December 1967, show the applicant received the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force during the period June 1966 to December 1967. U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065706C070421

    Original file (2001065706C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 be amended to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B and to show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, one overseas service bar, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Ribbon (RVNCM) with Device 1960, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Expert...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007279

    Original file (20100007279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. MACV Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provided for award of the CIB. The evidence does not show he was awarded an infantryman MOS, nor was he assigned in a qualifying position authorized the award of the CIB as provided in MACV Directive 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) while attached to the CORDS, Advisory Team 20 in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009016

    Original file (20090009016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of 3 years from 7 May 1963 through 6 May 1966. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013794

    Original file (20100013794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015365

    Original file (20080015365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that he served as a combat infantryman in Vietnam and that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, that during his first 4 months in Vietnam he was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 173rd Airborne Brigade. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018299

    Original file (20100018299.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and any unit awards he may be authorized. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and any unit awards he may be authorized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010024

    Original file (20070010024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of his release from active duty of 19 March 1970 from the Marine Corps, shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal, with two bronze service stars; however, when the applicant's last issued DD Form 214, dated 11 September 1979, was prepared, these two bronze service stars were overlooked and were not taken into account. To be entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence must show that an applicant held and served in...