Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020917
Original file (20090020917.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  08 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020917 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be issued a new DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) which shows his dates of service from 16 July 1971 to 7 September 1984, and that he was medically retired for a service related disability.

2.  The applicant states he requires this correction to apply for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and documents pertaining to his processing under the Disability Evaluation System.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) for assignment to a troop program unit on 1 May 1971.  

3.  He performed his initial active duty for training from 16 July 1971 to 28 January 1972 and was awarded the military occupational specialty of track vehicle mechanic.

4.  While on annual training with his USAR unit, the applicant was hit by falling boards that caused a contusion of his right antus-medial thigh.

5.  On 27 March 1984, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined the applicant was physically unfit due to traumatic rupture of the spleen, status post splenectomy and stiffness, weakness, edema, sympathetic dystrophy and degenerative joint disease, status post dislocation and fracture left tibia and fibula.  The PEB recommended that the applicant be rated 40 percent disabled and placed on the Retired List.

6.  The recommendation was approved.  Accordingly, on 7 September 1984 the applicant was placed on the Retired List with his retired pay based on 6 months and 5 days of service that was calculated under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1208.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation states that a DD Form 214 will be issued at the time of separation to each member of the Regular Army and each member of the Reserve components and the Army of the United States without component, called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training for a period of 90 days or more.  

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) defined active duty as full time duty in the active military service of the United States.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 records the service he performed while he was on initial active duty for training.  The applicant does not contest the dates he performed his initial active duty for training.

2.  A DD Form 214 does not record events which transpire after a Soldier's release or discharge from active duty.


3.  The applicant was placed on the Retired List for physical unfitness from his status as a Reservist for an injury he incurred performing duties as a Reservist.  The applicant had not served in an active duty status over 90 days at the time of his placement on the Retired List.

4.  As such, there is no basis for amending the applicant's DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020917



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020917



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010939

    Original file (20120010939.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be updated to show his status as permanent physical disability retirement and to include the time he was on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). The PEB recommended he be permanently retired from the service. Therefore, the dates of service reflected on the DD Form 214 are correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022435

    Original file (20120022435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 August 2012, the OGC requested through the Fort Belvoir RSO to the USAPDA an extension of his mobilization orders from 29 October 2012 until 25 February 2013 for the purpose of concluding his duties with the OGC, to take 20 days of PTDY, 86 days of accrued leave and additional days to demobilize from OGC not later than 2 November 2012. c. On 4 September 2012, he contacted the Fort Belvoir RSO to ascertain the status of his request to extend his mobilization orders and was told his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000735

    Original file (20130000735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of her records to show she served from 1978 to 1984 for a period of 6 years * correction of her U.S. Army Human Resources Command (AHRC) Form 606-E (Retirement Points), dated 29 June 2009, to show her social security number (SSN) as "xxx-xx-xxx6" instead of "xxx-xx-xxx8" 2. The applicant's request for correction of her records to show she served for a period of 6 years and correction of her SSN on her AHRC Form 606-E was carefully considered. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010619

    Original file (20080010619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 24 October 1991, to show he was medically discharged with entitlement to severance pay and incapacitation pay. The applicant states that he suffered injuries during his service in Saudi Arabia and that his injuries were determined to be “In Line of Duty.” He was subsequently assigned to a medical holding detachment at Fort McClellan,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06868-00

    Original file (06868-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the case of disability, the DD 214 will show active duty for only the period for which the member was ordered to active duty for training. The DD 214 will be issued to: (1) Personnel Released from Active Duty. The form will be prepared for personnel being separated from a period of active du* for training, full-time training duty, or active duty for special wo&k when the period of service was 90 days or more.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016440

    Original file (20140016440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 February 1976, he was honorably released from active duty and he was placed on the TDRL effective 20 February 1976 with a 40-percent disability rating. The applicant provided: a. a memorandum from Headquarters, U.S. Walson Army Hospital, dated 11 February 1976, stating he was serving on "active duty for training" on 4 May 1975 when his injury occurred in the line of duty and he was hospitalized during the period 4 May 1975 through 13 November 1975; and b. a memorandum from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017511

    Original file (20090017511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that in response to his application for consideration and promotion to LTC, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) found that he had completed 15 years, 10 months, and 16 days of active Federal service and a total of 24 years and 25 days of creditable service. A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty on 28 September 1961 and he was honorably retired on 4 December 1974 in the rank/grade of MAJ/O-4 by reason of permanent physical disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011584

    Original file (20120011584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record - Part II) * DD Form 363A (Certificate of Retirement) * DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * Orders D9-25 * a letter, dated 13 January 1984 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered active duty for training on 4 June 1978 and he completed his training on 14 September 1978. Since he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012600

    Original file (20140012600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Letter Orders Number D-5-967, issued by Office of the Adjutant General on 27 May 1971, ordered his retirement in the rank/grade of SGT/E-5 and placement on the TDRL with a combined rating of 90 percent, effective 7 June 1971. Medical facility commanders may consider patients for promotion under the normal promotion criteria of this chapter, together with the following guidance: (1) Individuals with recommended-list status for promotion to pay grade E-5 or E-6 resulting from selection by a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009954

    Original file (20100009954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His military records contain a Report of Medical Examination, dated 28 December 2005, for the purpose of his retention, that shows a temporary profile was recommended until a cardiac evaluation was completed. An SF 507 (Medical Record), dated 10 May 2006, shows he was advised on 16 March 2006 of his abnormal EKG and additional information was requested.