Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020776
Original file (20090020776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  01 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020776 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his two discharges from the Army National Guard (ARNG) and his completion of the Air Assault School and Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 13B (Cannon Crewman) Qualification Course be documented on his 2 October 1987 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). 

2.  The applicant states he plans to use the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) home loan benefit for purchase of a home and he believes the extra years and schooling may help his qualifying score.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents:

* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Forms 22 (NGB Report of Separation and Record of Service)
* Air Assault School Certificate of Training
* ARNG Honorable Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 

3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on
3 October 1984 and he was trained in and awarded MOS 11B (Infantryman).

3.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not include the Air Assault Badge and item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) does not list the Air Assault School or the MOS 13B course.

4.  On 2 October 1987, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) after completing 3 years of creditable active service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending
2 October 1987 shows he earned the following awards:

* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Army Lapel Button
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Grenade Bars.

5.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any documents indicating his completion of the Air Assault School during his active service.

6.  On 31 March 1988, the applicant enlisted in the ARNG.  He served until
9 August 1989, at which time he was discharged from the ARNG by reason of continuous and willful absence with a general under honorable conditions discharge (GD).  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  On 30 July 1992, he was honorably discharged from the Ready Reserve.

7.  On 12 October 1995, the applicant again enlisted in the ARNG.  He served for 3 years until being honorably discharged on 11 October 1998 by reason of expiration of service obligation.  The NGB Form 22 he was issued upon his discharge shows in item 12 (Military Education) completion of a 2-week cannon crewmember course in May 1998.  Item 13 (Primary Specialty Number, Title, and Date Awarded) shows his primary as 13B (Cannon Crewmember) that was awarded on 15 July 1998.

8.  The applicant provides a 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), The Air Assault School, Certificate of Training, issued to him on 16 January 1987.  This certificate indicates he completed air assault training and earned the distinctive right to wear the Air Assault Badge as a symbol of achievement.  The certificate is signed by the commandant of the school.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214, which is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states award of the Air Assault Badge requires that an individual must have satisfactorily completed an air assault training course according to the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command standardized Air Assault Core Program of Instruction, or completed the standard Air Assault Course while assigned or attached to the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) after 1 April 1974.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his service in the ARNG, the Air Assault School, and the Cannon Crewmember MOS 13B Qualification Course should be added to his DD Form 214.

2.  The DD Form 214 is meant to be a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  He was issued a DD Form 214 for his RA service from 3 October 1984 to 2 October 1987.  His record also contains two NGB Forms 22 which summarize his ARNG service from 31 March 1988 to 9 August 1989 and from 12 October 1995 to
11 October 1998.  His periods of service in the ARNG are subsequent to his 

REFRAD; therefore, his separation documents are correct as constituted.  As a result, there is no basis for combining his ARNG service on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant's OMPF is void of any corroborating evidence that shows he completed Air Assault training.  Absent any evidence of record (academic evaluation report/record of training) the certificate he provides alone is insufficient evidentiary basis to support adding this course to his DD Form 214 at this late date.

4.  The applicant's record confirms he completed the MOS 13B course while in the ARNG and that it is properly documented on the NGB Form 22 he was issued on 11 October 1998.  His completion of the MOS 13B course was subsequent to his REFRAD.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of the applicant's requested relief. 

5.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for benefits from another agency.  The granting of veteran's benefits is not within the purview of the ABCMR and any questions regarding eligibility for such benefits should be addressed to the VA.

6.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020776



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020776



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028470

    Original file (20100028470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 12f (RECORD OF SERVICE: FOREIGN SERVICE) shows he completed 11 months and 25 days of foreign service; c. Item 13 (DECORATIONS, MEDALS, BADGES, CITATIONS, AND CAMPAIGN RIBBONS AWARDED OR AUTHORIZED) shows these awards: * Army Commendation Medal * Army Achievement Medal (4th Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal * Korea Defense Service Medal * Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (2nd Award) * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002046

    Original file (20150002046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests – * award of the National Defense Service Medal * issuance of a document in a DD Form 214 format in lieu of his "Summary of Discharge" * a separation document to cover his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) service, award of the National Defense Service Medal, and award of military occupational specialty (MOS) 42A (Human Resources Specialist) 2. The available records contain no evidence that the National Guard authorized award of the National Defense Service Medal during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022623

    Original file (20100022623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, his DD Form 214 should: a. show in item 11 the entry 13B, Cannon Crewmember - 17 years, 7 months and 31C, Radio Operator - Maintainer, 21 years, 1 month; b. include in item 13 the entry Iraq Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars and the Combat Action Badge; c. include in item 14 the entry Radio Teletype Operator Course, 13 weeks, November 1984; and d. show in item 18 the entry Immediate Reenlistments This Period: 19871209 - 19930908, 19930909 - 19970521, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019853

    Original file (20140019853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to include military occupational specialties (MOS) 13B (Cannon Crewmember) and 13M (Multiple Launch Rocket Crewmember (MLRS)) in addition to MOS 68W1O (Health Care Specialist). The applicant's DD Form 214 issued for the period 6 March 2010 through 14 June 2011 covering his active duty in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010383

    Original file (20140010383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award), Drivers Badge, and Air Assault Badge * he completed the Air Assault Course in October 1989, Jungle Warfare Training Course in January 1990 and August 1991, and the Defense Hazardous Materials Waste/Handling Course in October 1991 * his foreign service in Panama 2. With respect to showing his service in Panama, the regulation at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011332

    Original file (20110011332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his deployment during Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm, his total period of foreign service, and the correct periods he served in each of his military occupational specialties (MOS). The applicant provides his Enlisted Record Brief, three DD Forms 214, and a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service). Basic training and advanced...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065542C070421

    Original file (2001065542C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he meets the eligibility requirements for promotion to major but that the computer at the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) does not show that he has completed the Infantry Officer Advanced Course, so he has not been considered for promotion. On 8 January 1986, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) responded to a request from the applicant, case number AC 85-00251, to correct his commissioning as a USAR officer from 23 August 1983...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019382

    Original file (20080019382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) contains the entry 1997 08 13 (1997 August 13). The only documents in his military personnel records jacket that these dates would refer to are his DD Form 214 and his NGB Form 22.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005767

    Original file (20130005767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    MOS 21R was not a Critical Skill for the PRARNG or NGB at the time of enlistment and the applicant should not have been offered the incentives. The applicant enlisted in the PRARNG for a 6-year term on 30 July 2008. Although the applicant enlisted in good faith, and notwithstanding the favorable advisory opinion provided by the G-1 official, the applicant was not entitled to either option and he should not receive an incentive that was offered in error and is not otherwise offered to others.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022499

    Original file (20110022499.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The commander stated DD Form 1966, block 32a, showed the applicant would be receiving a critical skill $20,000 bonus and was signed by the applicant and the recruiter on the date of enlistment, 28 March 2008. An official at the NGB stated although a NPS enlistment bonus was offered at the time of the applicant's enlistment on 28 March 2008, the bonus addendum was not signed until 7 April 2008, therefore the incentive was retroactive. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...