Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020339
Original file (20090020339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  24 Jun 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090020339 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he wounded his right index finger on a machete blade in the heat of battle while receiving incoming mortar rounds.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), a copy of his separation physical, and a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Records show the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 November 1965.  He served in Vietnam from 20 August 1966 to 13 August 1967.  He was honorably released from active duty on 15 August 1967.

3.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not list the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

4.  The applicant provided a copy of his separation physical, dated 4 August 1967.  The applicant checked "Yes" to question 34 (Have you consulted or been treated by clinics, physicians, healers, or other practitioners within the past 5 years).  He explained that he "fell on [machete lined-through] big knife and cut index finger on right hand and had to be stitched up."

5.  The VA Rating Decision, dated 16 April 2009, shows the applicant was awarded a 10-percent disability rating for a lacerated right index finger that was incurred during the Vietnam Era.

6.  Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows no entries for any wounds received.

7.  The available records contain no documentation which shows the applicant sustained wounds or was treated for wounds incurred as a result of hostile action.

8.  The records contain no evidence or general orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart and his name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There are no general orders available awarding the applicant the Purple Heart and his name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty report.  The applicant provided a copy of his physical examination in which he states he fell on a big knife and cut his index finger.  However, without medical records showing the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action and required treatment by a medical officer, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ____x____  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020339



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090020339



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007279

    Original file (20140007279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record contains a DA Form 8-275-3 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet) that shows he was attacked by a Vietnamese civilian and cut across his forearm in two places with a machete on 2 October 1966, while on duty in the Republic of Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007117

    Original file (20080007117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He departed Vietnam on or about 13 August 1967. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded to any member of an Armed Force who has been wounded or killed in any action against an enemy of the United States. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base awarding the applicant the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090174C070212

    Original file (2003090174C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was attacked while on duty in Vietnam and was cut with a machete. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 December 1954. The applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 1974, shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal; however, it does not show the number of service stars to which the applicant is entitled for campaign participation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014227

    Original file (20060014227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 26 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart, the "Machete" Bar, or the Panamanian-Pana Jungle Badge. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned to show award of the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001298

    Original file (20130001298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20050012938 on 29 June 2006. There is no reference to the origin of the applicant's injury listed in the medical records provided by the applicant. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 stated that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020120

    Original file (20090020120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart and correcting his records accordingly. The applicant states that the FSM was wounded in Vietnam on 1 March 1971 when he sustained lacerations to his right hand from a machete and underwent surgery for that wound. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000972C070206

    Original file (20050000972C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds he received in Korea and Vietnam. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not list any wounds in item 40 (Wounds). The applicant was assigned to Korea in April 1969 as a personnel staff NCO.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000972C070206

    Original file (20050000972C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds he received in Korea and Vietnam. The applicant was assigned to Korea in April 1969 as a personnel staff NCO. DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION DENY REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun ISSUES 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008628

    Original file (20120008628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In order to support award of the Purple Heart, the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence to show the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016958C071029

    Original file (20060016958C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was credited with participation in five campaigns while in Vietnam; therefore, he is eligible to wear one silver service star on his Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain an administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 30 November 1987; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any...