Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019815
Original file (20090019815.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  20 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090019815 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation From Active Duty) for the period ending 30 April 1976 be corrected to add the Army Sea Duty Ribbon (ASDR) and the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that his Army Marine Service Book verifies his entitlement to the ASDR and he is entitled to the Purple Heart for the traumatic amputation of his finger.

3.  The applicant provides a Department of Veterans Affairs computerized disability rating summary; his DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 April 1976; an internet printout of ribbon only awards; and his Marine Service Book.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 5–7, Army Sea Duty Ribbon, states that on 17 April 2006, the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) approved the establishment of the ASDR.  It is awarded to members of the Active Army, Army National Guard (ARNG), and United States Army Reserve (USAR) for completion of designated periods of sea duty aboard Class A and Class B United States Army Vessels (USAV).  The ASDR may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who were credited with service as defined above after 1 August 1952, the activation date of the first heavy boat company in the Transportation Corps.  Eligible members or their next of kin may submit requests for the ASDR to the Chief, Marine Qualification Division, Attention: Career Pay Office, HRC, Building 705, Room 231, 705 Read Street, Fort Eustis, VA 23604–5407.  Requests should include the individual’s full name, social security number or serial number, dates of service, DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) (if applicable), and information concerning the individual’s qualifying sea service duty.

3.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records), the regulation which governs the Board, paragraph 2-9, states an application may be rejected by the staff of the ABCMR if the applicant has not exhausted all available administrative remedies afforded by existing law or regulation to correct the alleged error or injustice.

4.  Since there is no evidence that the applicant submitted a request for award of the ASDR to the HRC, he has not exhausted his administrative remedies.  As such, this portion of his request will not be discussed further in these proceedings.

5.  The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty in May 1953 and was released from active duty in May 1955.  He enlisted in the Marine Corps in October 1955 and was released from active duty in November 1957.  He enlisted in the Army on 14 November 1957, served two tours in Korea, Germany, three tours in Vietnam, and Okinawa.

6.  The applicant served in a variety of military occupational specialties, including marine engineer, and senior amphibian engine mechanic.

7.  On 5 October 1967 while in Vietnam, the applicant's finger was amputated.  A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) show that the applicant "was attempting to place the port ramp cable around the ramp winch.  A forklift had lifted the ramp to allow the ramp cable to remain slack so he could place it around the winch.  The ramp slipped off the forklift blade.  This caused the slack cable to tighten and strike [the applicant's] left hand which was located between the winch and the cable.  The tips of three fingers were crushed and dismembered."

8.  On 30 April 1976, the applicant was retired for years of service.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While there is conclusive evidence to show the applicant suffered a traumatic amputation of his finger while in Vietnam, it is abundantly clear that the amputation was due to an accident and not as a result of hostile action.

2.  As such, the applicant is not entitled to the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019815



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019815


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020032

    Original file (20100020032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect a combat wound or injury and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show award of the Purple Heart. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant's finger injury resulted from an unfortunate accident. Additionally, his record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020022

    Original file (20110020022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. The medical evidence provided by the applicant indicates he cut his right fifth digit finger. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018324

    Original file (20140018324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides and his record contains evidence that shows he was wounded while serving in the Republic of Vietnam; however, the evidence shows his wounds resulted from a non-hostile accident/incident. His record does not contain evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024367

    Original file (20100024367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains his DD Form 230 (Service Record) which shows no entries in Section 8 (Wounds Received through Enemy Action). Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows he sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record there is an insufficient basis for awarding him the Purple Heart. _______ _ __X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009429

    Original file (20120009429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, there is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided any evidence showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Absent evidence that conclusively shows the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001480

    Original file (20090001480.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all units assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. The applicant's Clinical Record Cover Sheet, his DA Form 20, and the Vietnam casualty list all show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016071

    Original file (20140016071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As new issues he requests correction of his record to show, in effect: * "Army Sea Medal" * marksmanship badges for the M-16 Rifle and hand grenade * Vietnam service and the unit awards he is entitled to receive as a result of this service 3. His OMPF does not include an order or any other evidence to shows he qualified with the hand grenade, or that he earned any additional awards while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020421

    Original file (20140020421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available for review. The VA Rating Decision goes on to explain that service connection for amputation of the right index finger was granted because this condition, which existed prior to military service permanently worsened as a result of service (emphasis added). While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was wounded in Korea in action against the enemy is not in doubt, the applicant has failed to show through the available evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004279

    Original file (20090004279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was wounded in combat and to be awarded the Purple Heart. However, there is insufficient evidence to grant the FSM the Purple Heart in this case. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, and that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014565

    Original file (20080014565.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was wounded in his right thigh by shrapnel during a rocket attack on 27 February 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam; however, his injury was not entered into his medical records. In his statement, dated 17 January 2008, a retired Lieutenant General (LTG) states that he served at Da Nang during the same time frame and that he learned that the applicant was wounded during a rocket attack but was not awarded the Purple Heart. There are no general orders that show he...