Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019767
Original file (20090019767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090019767 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show that he served in the Army from 23 September 1974 through 22 September 1978.

2.  The applicant states his service records should show he served from 24 March 1970 through 23 March 1973 and from 23 September 1974 through 30 September 1995, the date of his retirement.  He states in effect, he is entitled to retirement benefits based on 24 years of service rather than 22 years of service.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 



has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 24 March 1970 for a period of 3 years.  He completed training as a light weapons infantryman.

3.  After completing 3 years of total active service, he was honorably released from active duty on 23 March 1973 and was transferred to the United States Army Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete is Reserve obligation.  He was furnished a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect this period of service.

4.  On 23 September 1974, he enlisted in the RA for 4 years.  After completing    3 years, 9 months, and 3 days of net active service this period, the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 15 June 1978, for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He was issued a DD Form 214 to reflect this period of service.

5.  On 26 June 1978, the applicant reenlisted in the RA for a period of 3 years.  He remained on active duty through a series of reenlistments and extensions.  

6.  After completing 17 years, 3 months, and 5 days of net active service this period the applicant was retired from the RA, due to obtaining sufficient service for retirement.  He was issued a DD Form 214 to reflect this service and his total prior active service of 6 years, 9 months and 3 days.

7.  A calculation of the applicant's service reveals that he had 24 years and 8 days of total active service. 

8.  Information obtained from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) reveals that the applicant is currently receiving retired pay based on his 24 years and 8 days of total active service.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  The DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual's service as it exists on the date of release from active duty or discharge.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A review of the available records does not show an error in the applicant's dates of service in the RA.

2.  He was issued three DD Forms 214 to show all of his service in the RA and a calculation of his service, along with information obtained from DFAS, reveals that he completed 24 years and 8 days of total active service, for which he is currently receiving retired pay.

3.  There is no basis for changing the dates of service currently reflected in his official records and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows he is receiving retirement benefits based on 22 years of total active service instead of 24 years.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019767



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019767



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009358

    Original file (AR20140009358.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, amendment of the orders retiring him for permanent disability by replacing the entries "Not Applicable" with correct entries for the lines pertaining to "Disability retirement," "Basic pay," "Completed over 4 years of active service as Enl [enlisted] or WO [warrant officer]," and "Member of an armed force on 24 Sep 1975." He indicates the following statements listed on the orders are incorrect: * "Disability Retirement: Not Applicable" * "Basic pay: Not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018205

    Original file (20100018205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 14 July 1983 to show: * his retirement date as 14 July 1984 * he was awarded six Army Good Conduct Medals * a combined total of 20 years of active service in the Army and Navy 2. The applicant's final DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 July 1983 provides the following information: * entered active duty this period on 30 November 1978 * retired by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000443

    Original file (20090000443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he completed 18 years of total active service. The applicant’s military personnel records contain a DD Form 4 that shows he reenlisted in the U.S. Army for a period of 4 years on 10 March 1978. The applicant’s military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty in the RA this period on 10 March 1978 and was honorably discharged based on physical disability with severance pay on 29 November 1990.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019806

    Original file (20140019806.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, based on the evidence of record, there is no basis to correct item 15 of his DD Form 214 as it correctly shows the date he entered active duty this period. However, based on the evidence of record, it would be appropriate to issue the applicant a document showing his honorable period of service in the RA from 23 August 1968 through 30 May 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019976

    Original file (20130019976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for correction of records to show he performed temporary duty (TDY) in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the period 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show he performed TDY in the RVN during the period 8 September 1966 to 20 December 1966 was carefully reconsidered. However, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his records to show this period of foreign service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006026

    Original file (20070006026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that: a. item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty [AD] This Period), item 12c (Net Active Service This Period), item 12d (Total Prior Active Service), and item 12f (Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that was issued at the time of his retirement on 20 April 1997 (which will simply be referred to as his DD Form 214 throughout the remainder of these proceedings) be corrected; b. his retirement pay be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001959

    Original file (20070001959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that this correction resulted in the applicant being credited with 2 additional days of active service based on his active duty training service during the period 23 – 24 April 1977. Thus, the applicant provides evidence to substantiate his claim that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 1991, does not reflect credit for the 2 days of active duty training during the period 23 – 24 April 1977. However, the applicant’s DD Form 214, with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003227

    Original file (20090003227.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records contain a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty in the RA this period on 14 April 1978 and was honorably retired from active duty on 31 March 1994 based on sufficient service for retirement. The evidence of record further shows that these two periods of inactive and active service are accurately documented on the applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 18 March 1971. As a result, the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003839

    Original file (20090003839.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * Two letters of response, dated 20 February 2009 and 19 December 2008, from the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (HRC-STL); * Letter, dated 11 February 2009, addressed to the Transition and Separations Branch, HRC-STL; * NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service); * DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 January 1978; * NGB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000983

    Original file (20090000983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 APRIL 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090000983 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He maintains that the retirement points, as reported on the applicant's ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), do not accurately reflect each 1-year period of his qualifying service under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12732(a)(2). The following additional information from the ARPC Form 249-E for the period covering 29 September 1969 through 29...