IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 26 August 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090019735
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests payment of an Officer Candidate School (OCS) bonus in the amount of $8,000.00.
2. The applicant states the OCS bonus was in his original contract. However, his contract was redone with the OCS bonus removed. He believes the OCS bonus was wrongfully removed and states he knows other officers who have been given the OCS bonus.
3. The applicant provides his original DA Form 3286 (Statement of Understanding Regular Army Enlistment Delay for Applicants with Prior Service or an Existing Military Service Obligation).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 March 1999.
2. On 6 February 2003, the applicant enlisted in the USAR Control Group (Reserve Officers' Training Corps).
3. On 6 April 2006, the applicant completed a DA Form 3286 in which he indicated he was enlisting in the Army with the options of the Officer/Warrant Officer Enlistment Program and the Incentive Enlistment Program (U.S. Army OCS Bonus).
4. On 10 August 2006, the applicant enlisted in the Army in pay grade E-5. In conjunction with his enlistment he executed a new DA Form 3286 in which the Incentive Enlistment Program (U.S. Army OCS Bonus) was deleted.
5. On the date the applicant submitted his request to the ABCMR, he was serving on active duty as a first lieutenant.
6. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Department of the Army Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1. The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request. He stated the applicant did, in fact, sign an enlistment contract for the OCS bonus on 6 April 2006. However, in April 2006 the Army determined it did not have the authority to offer the OCS bonus. As a result, contracts for applicants who had not yet begun basic training were renegotiated to eliminate the unauthorized OCS bonus. The advisory official states the applicant's contract was renegotiated to delete the OCS bonus. At that time the applicant had the choice to accept the modified contract or to decline enlistment in the Army.
7. The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion and submitted a response. In his response he stated that he attended basic combat training in 1999 and that another officer he knows who was wrongfully denied the OCS bonus was later given the bonus. The applicant concludes that based on the precedent of his fellow officer's case and the clear language of the directive which established the OCS bonus, he is entitled to the bonus. In the applicant's response he includes Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 05-089, dated 12 April 2005, which implemented the OCS bonus for the Army.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. While the applicant executed a contract in which he was promised an OCS bonus, based on a legal interpretation, it was determined that bonus could not be legally offered.
2. Therefore, the applicant's contract was properly modified to remove the OCS bonus. The applicant had a choice of accepting the modified contract or not enlisting in the Army. He chose to accept the modified contract.
3. The MILPER message which erroneously offered the OCS bonus cited by the applicant has been noted. However, that message was later determined to offer a bonus which the Army could not legally offer. Therefore, it does not establish the basis for granting the applicant's request.
4. As for the other officer who received an OCS bonus, the facts of that case are unknown. However, the ABCMR does not establish precedent. The ABCMR is administrative and not legal. Every case considered by the ABCMR is considered on its own merits. In this case, the applicant's request is not found to have merit.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ____X___ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
______________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100009632
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090019735
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010292
The applicant's records further show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years in the rank/grade of specialist/E-4 on 29 June 2005. He subsequently completed OCS at Fort Benning, GA, from 29 June 2005 to 14 December 2005 and was honorably discharged on 14 December 2005 for the purpose of accepting a commission in the Army. The applicant enlisted on 10 May 2005 under an enlistment program that became effective on 11 April 2005; he enlisted in the Regular Army under the OCS...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014831
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides: * DA Forms 3286 (Statement for Enlistment U.S. Army Enlistment Program), dated 29 March 2006 and 7 February 2008 * DA Form 3340-R (Request for Reenlistment or Extension in the RA) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States), dated 7 February 2008 * DA Form 4789 (Statement of Entitlement to Selective Reenlistment Bonus) * Email, dated 15 and 16...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012305
A memorandum dated 20 November 2002 shows that the applicants request to receive CSRB in MOS 18F was approved. The summary sheet explained that due to subsequent changes to the CSRB Program, eligible Soldiers were authorized to add 1 or more years to their original CSRB obligation and be paid the new amount for the additional obligation. However, because the applicant request for an additional 1 year CSRB is dated 21 November 2005, after the end of his previous CSRB obligation, it was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011844
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show he is eligible to be paid the Officer Candidate School (OCS) bonus based on enlistment for the OCS option. A Directorate of Military Personnel Management memorandum, dated 20 April 2006, subject: Advisory Opinion for 09S OCS Bonus Recipients, stated that due to an urgent need for OCS applicants, the Army implemented an enlistment bonus of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015555
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he is authorized the remaining $2,000.00 of his $9,000.00 cash bonus. The applicant's record contains a DA Form 3286-66 (Statement of Understanding - U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program), dated 22 January 2002, which shows in pertinent part, that the applicant enlisted for 4 years and for the U.S. Army Cash Bonus. The available evidence shows the applicant enlisted for two enlistment bonuses for a total bonus...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005286
The applicant requests correction of his records to remove the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) benefit from his enlistment contract and military records so he can use the Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. As a result, he forfeited the LRP option by failing OCS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the LRP benefit/option from his enlistment contract * amending his DD Form 3266 to show he elected to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015078C070206
This document shows, in pertinent part, that for a 4-year enlistment in MOS 63A, a $2,000.00 Enlistment Bonus was authorized. The evidence of record shows that, upon enlistment in the U.S. Army in MOS 63A for a period of 4 years, the applicant was granted a $6,000.00 Enlistment Bonus, which exceeded (by $4,000.00) the $2,000.00 Enlistment Bonus authorized by the Enlistment Bonus Program Changes message cited in the applicant's enlistment contract. The evidence of record shows that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005238
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show entitlement to an $8,000.00 HIGRAD bonus based on his successful completion of Officer Candidate School (OCS) and commissioning as an officer. The evidence of record and the advisory opinion from the G-1 clearly show the Army intended that the applicant be authorized the $8,000.00 enlistment bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that the applicants enlistment contract be amended to include entitlement to an $8,000.00...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000122C070205
The commander stated that when an ROTC scholarship contract is breached, any obligation to the Army must be satisfied through order to active duty in an enlisted status or by repaying the cost of advanced education assistance provided by the Army. Had the applicant elected an expeditious order to active duty to repay his debt for breaching his ROTC contract, he would have been assigned against the needs of the Army, in pay grade E-1, and not allowed any enlistment options. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014516
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show entitlement to an $8,000.00 HIGRAD bonus based on his successful completion of Officer Candidate School (OCS) and commissioning as an officer. In an advisory opinion, dated 20 April 2006, the Army G-1, Director of Military Personnel Management, stated that due to the urgent need for OCS applicants, the Army implemented an enlistment bonus of $8,000.00 for OCS applicants as an extension of the current policy of paying an enlistment...