Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019375
Original file (20090019375.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090019375 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).

2.  The applicant states the following:

   a.  The DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) was submitted by the Camp Humphreys Retirement office prior to his retirement date stating his desire not to participate in SBP.

   b.  The DD Form 2656 of his election not to participate in SBP was not processed due to an error on the form.

   c.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) has the original DD Form 2656 on file along with other documents he submitted after retirement regarding stopping SBP coverage.

   d.  He retired from active duty overseas (Camp Humphreys, South Korea) with an effective retirement date of 1 July 2009.

   e.  He and his spouse declined SBP coverage and he notified DFAS that the SBP payments were being deducted from his retired pay.
   
   f.  DFAS informed him that SBP was granted by default because of the error on the original DD Form 2656.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his letter addressed to DFAS, dated 13 August 2009, and a Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 June 1988.  He was married on 6 August 1991.

2.  On 7 August 2008, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 and he elected not to participate in SBP.  His spouse did not sign the DD Form 2656 under Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) to indicate she concurred with the SBP decision made by her spouse.  However, in a notarized statement, dated
18 August 2008, the applicant's spouse concurred with his decision to decline SBP.

3.  The applicant retired on 1 July 2009.

4.  On 13 August 2009, the applicant sent a letter to DFAS in regard to the SBP.  He stated that he and his wife had decided to decline SBP but it was currently being taken out of his retired pay.  In the letter, he explained he spoke with several representatives at DFAS and the Retirement Services Officer (RSO) to resolve this matter.  He was informed that he needed to submit a written request not to participate in the SBP.  Also, he was informed that DFAS had received his original DD Form 2656, but the form contained an error.

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted on 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Elections are made by category, not by name.  An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child only coverage, if applicable) coverage. 

6.  Public Law 105-85, enacted on 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a one-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started, to withdraw from SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant retired on 1 July 2009.

2.  The applicant completed a DD Form 2656 on 7 August 2008 and elected not to participate in SBP.  His spouse did not sign the DD Form 2656 indicating she concurred with his decision to decline participation in the SBP.

3.  However, the applicant's spouse provided a notarized statement, dated 
18 August 2008, concurring with his decision to decline the SBP.  This statement, though timely, was apparently not married up the applicant’s DD Form 2656.  As a result, he was automatically enrolled in the SBP.

4.  It appears it was the applicant's and his spouse’s intent to decline participation in the SBP.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to amend the applicant’s DD Form 2656 to show he declined to participate in the SBP in a timely manner and to refund him any paid premiums.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending his DD Form 2656 to show he and his spouse signed the form declining to participate in the SBP,

	b.  showing DFAS timely received and processed the DD Form 2656 confirming declination of SBP, and



	c.  refunding him all SBP premiums paid as a result of this correction.



      ___________x____________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019375



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090019375



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018041

    Original file (20080018041.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ABCMR analyst of record telephonically contacted the DFAS Retired Pay Office on 23 January 2009, which confirmed that the DD Form 2656, dated 10 July 2008 was not authenticated by the spouse on or after the date the applicant made his election. In a notarized statement, dated 27 January 2009, the applicant's spouse indicated that she had previously agreed with her husband's decision to not participate in the SBP and that she previously signed the one form provided by the Fort Drum, NY,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008254

    Original file (20080008254.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he and his spouse elected not to participate in the SBP; however, when they completed the DD Form 2656 (Date for Payment of Retired Personnel), she erroneously entered the date "20061214" instead of "20071214," resulting in a "default" spouse coverage based on the full amount. The applicant’s DD Form 2656, dated 14 December 2007, shows he elected “Not to participate in the SBP" and placed an "x" in Item 26g (I Elect Not to Participate in the SBP). As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002692

    Original file (20090002692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant elected not to participate in spousal SBP coverage on 25 March 2008. It would, therefore, be just and equitable to show that the applicant elected not to participate in the SBP on 25 March 2008 with her spouse’s concurrence on 26 March 2008, and to correct her applicable records to show her DD Form 2656 was accepted and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007522

    Original file (20100007522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends the DD Form 2656 that he completed on 27 October 2009 where he declined SBP spouse coverage should be honored and the SBP premiums refunded because both he and his spouse were present when he signed the document in the presence of an Army SBP counselor and notary public, respectively. The evidence of record confirms that on 27 October 2009, in his application for retired pay, the applicant declined to participate in SBP. The evidence shows that, for some period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001582

    Original file (20090001582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's Retiree Account Statement, dated 9 July 2008, shows an SBP deduction of $268.84 for spouse only coverage, indicating that he was covered under the SBP for spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows that the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he elected, in the presence of an RSO counselor, not to participate in the SBP. The SBP spouse concurrence statement shows she concurred with his decision after the date he made that decision but not before he retired.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021486

    Original file (20140021486 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since he was not serving on active duty at the time his disability retirement orders were published on 23 May 2013 and it is not known when those orders were received, it is reasonable to presume that he did not participate in standard retirement briefings between that date and the effective date of his retirement on 27 June 2013, 1 month and 5 days later. It would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show he submitted a DD Form 2656 declining SBP coverage on 26 June 2013, 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001471

    Original file (20140001471.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement. After he retired, on 30 August 2013, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 and elected not to participate in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 2656 to show he and his spouse timely signed the form declining to participate in the SBP and the form was properly notarized; b. showing DFAS timely received and processed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011716

    Original file (20080011716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) with his spouse's concurrence. By doing so, he also acknowledged he had been counseled that he can terminate SBP participation, with his spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. Completion of Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) of DD Form 2656 is required when a service member is married and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006454

    Original file (20080006454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of Item 27 (Level of Coverage) of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), on his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), to show “Coverage with a Reduced Base Amount of $635.00” instead of “Coverage Based on the Threshold Amount in Effect on the Date of Retirement.” 2. The applicant states that he and his spouse elected coverage with a reduced base amount of $635.00 in Item 27 of his DD Form 2656, which was the minimum threshold amount in effect at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020627

    Original file (20090020627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His spouse did not sign the DD Form 2656 under Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) to indicate she concurred with the SBP decision made by her spouse. The applicant's RAS, dated 2 November 2009, shows that he is paying SBP coverage, spouse only, in the amount of $265.92. An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child only coverage, if applicable) coverage.