IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 27 May 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090018926
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
2. The applicant states he wants to apply for and receive veterans' benefits and medical care.
3. The applicant provides:
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile)
* Enlisted Record Brief
* Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care)
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 June 1996. He served as a health care specialist and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments. He attained the rank of specialist on 1 September 1998.
2. On 17 November 2006, the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial of two specifications of selling military property. He was sentenced to be reduced to pay grade E-1, to be confined for 13 months, and to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge. On 25 January 2007, the convening authority approved the sentence.
3. On 2 May 1007, the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence.
4. On 23 August 2007, the convening authority ordered the bad conduct discharge to be executed.
5. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 1 February 2008 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial. He had served a total of 10 years, 6 months, and 13 days of creditable active service with 394 days of lost time.
6. In support of his claim, the applicant provided a Standard Form 600, dated 21 October 2005, which shows he was treated for neck/back pain. He also provided a DA Form 3349, dated 1 June 2006, which shows he was issued a permanent physical profile of 231111 for chronic neck pain.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3 of this regulation states that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
8. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization.
9. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of making the applicant eligible for veterans' or medical benefits. Every case is individually decided based upon its merits when an applicant requests a change in his or her discharge.
2. Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense charged. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
3. The applicant's record of service included one general court-martial conviction and 394 days of lost time. As a result, his record of service was not satisfactory. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant a general discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018926
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018926
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007514
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. Paragraph 3-11 of this regulation states that a Soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001119
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Conviction and discharge were affected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. The applicant's entire military record was taken...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005636
However, the applicant provided documentation which shows he received medical treatment on two occasions for injuries sustained as a result of physical altercations while in confinement. Since there is no evidence of record to show the applicant was ever medically unfit to perform his duties, there is no basis for granting his request for a medical discharge. Evidence of record shows the applicant suffered LOD injuries on 15 October 2006 and on 24 December 2006 while in confinement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014594
Accordingly, he was discharged on 28 April 2006 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, by reason of court-martial with a bad conduct discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021458
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021458 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-10, provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a General or Special Court-Martial. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004701
The physician stated the applicant was being seen for right neck pain. b. Paragraph 42 (Soldiers with suspended sentences) states a Soldier may not be referred for, or continue, disability processing if under sentence of dismissal or punitive discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a GCM of being AWOL/deserting in an attempt to avoid deployment and he was ordered to be discharged with a BCD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010942
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 February 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130010942 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. A Standard Form 600, dated 5 April 1976, shows the applicant was determined to be a rehabilitation failure as directed by the unit commander. On 21 December 1977, the applicant was discharged in accordance with his affirmed sentence under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 11-2.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010885
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The Board is empowered to change the characterization of the discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Given the above, and after a thorough review of the applicants record and any evidence submitted, there is no cause for clemency.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011216
The applicant requests, his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a discharge under honorable conditions through clemency. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged on 21 March 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) because of a conviction by a general court-martial. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017257
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090017257 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.