Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018735
Original file (20090018735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  20 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018735 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal (AM) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

2.  The applicant states he received a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) showing he is authorized the AM and ARCOM.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a letter from NPRC, dated 16 October 2009.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army 22 November 1966.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 71H (Personnel Specialist) and honorably released from active duty on 21 November 1969. 

2.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the AM or the ARCOM.

3.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the AM or the ARCOM.

4.  The applicant's record is void of documentation showing he was recommended for or awarded either the AM or the ARCOM.


5.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the AM or the ARCOM pertaining to the applicant.

6.  The letter from NPRC provided by the applicant authorized shipment of the AM and the ARCOM based on documents he had provided and/or other official documents, if available.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the following:

   a.  The AM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.

   b.  The ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service.  

   c.  All personal decorations require formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to reflect award of the AM and the ARCOM was carefully considered and not supported by the evidence in this case.

2.  The letter the applicant received from NPRC indicates the agency authorized shipment based on documents he had provided or other official documents.  Those documents were not provided in support of this request and are not contained in his available records.  In the absence of any official documentation showing he received these awards, there is no basis for correcting his record to show award of the AM or the ARCOM.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018735



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018735



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011507C080407

    Original file (20070011507C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains an Office of The Adjutant General, United States Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center (ARPERCEN) letter, dated 7 April 1980, which includes a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) that indicates that the applicant was authorized and issued the following awards: AM with Numeral 2 (3rd Award); ARCOM; AGCM; Meritorious Unit Emblem; NDSM; VSM with 1 silver service star and 1 bronze service star; and RVN Campaign Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022370

    Original file (20100022370.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the following awards: * Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) with one bronze service star * Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOTEM) * Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) * Combat Action Badge * Air Medal (AM) * Any unit awards 2. The applicant requested award of the CAB and correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002737

    Original file (20140002737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in his military records that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second ARCOM. In the absence of orders or any other evidence indicating he was awarded the second award of the ARCOM, the NPRC letter he provided is insufficient evidence on which to base correction his DD Form 214 to show two awards of the ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002423

    Original file (20130002423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * A self-authored statement * DD Form 214, effective 8 January 1971 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), effective 28 November 2012 * DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) * Honorable Discharge Certificate * Letter written to his mother, undated * 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile ) Vietnam Combat Certificate * U.S. Army Military Medals website award information * The Battle of Song Mao internet article * Task Force South Daily Situation Report, dated 4 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023281

    Original file (20100023281.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023281 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he has certificates for the AM and ARCOM, but they are not recorded in his military record. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012453

    Original file (20110012453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 23 April 1970 * National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 31 October 1991 * NPRC letters, dated 31 December 2010 and 5 November 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's record is void...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020495

    Original file (20140020495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records shows Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, General Orders (GO) Number 1650, dated 25 March 1968, and GO Number 7444, dated 7 November 1968, announced award of the AM to the applicant for meritorious achievement from 12 October 1967 to 29 February 1968. Therefore, it is concluded that he is entitled to correction of his records to show one award of the AM; b. GOs awarded the applicant the Soldier's Medal for heroism; c. the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015598

    Original file (20140015598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal (AM) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (2nd Award). Records show he participated in four campaigns during his service in the RVN. In the absence of corroborating evidence in his official military personnel file or in ADCARS that shows orders were issued awarding him the AM or the ARCOM (2nd Award), he is not entitled to have his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012147

    Original file (20140012147 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to show any evidence that he was awarded or authorized the AM, ARCOM for meritorious service (or meritorious achievement), or the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar. The applicant's military personnel records fail to reveal evidence of a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (1st Award). As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003374

    Original file (20130003374.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in his records authorizing him award of the Distinguished Service Medal, Soldier's Medal, or the Army Commendation Medal. With regard to the award of the Distinguished Service Medal, Soldier's Medal, and Army Commendation Medal, there is no evidence of record and he provided insufficient evidence to show he was awarded these awards during any of his periods of service. A separate DA Form 638 is required for each individual recommended award.