Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018514
Original file (20090018514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  04 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018514 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his service computation dates be corrected on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states that his service dates on his DD Form 214 are incorrect because they reflect that he was enlisted for 6 years and 7 months when, in fact, he was enlisted for 14 years.  He goes on to state that until this error is corrected he cannot file for his military disability benefits.  He also states that he has been having problems with a lot of his paperwork because he and his son have the same name and their social security numbers are somehow crossed.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his driver's license, social security card, and two DD Forms 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 13 March 1953 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 September 1974 for a period of 3 years.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 3 December 1975.

3.  On 8 June 1977, he was honorably discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He had served 2 years, 9 months, and 6 days of total active service.

4.  On 9 June 1977, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years.  He was again honorably discharged on 30 July 1981 and reenlisted on 31 July 1981 in the pay grade of E-5 for a period of 6 years and a selective reenlistment bonus.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 11 December 1981.

5.  On 19 February 1986, he was discharged under honorable conditions in the pay grade of E-4 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge shows that he had completed 8 years, 8 months, and 11 days of active service during the period covered by his DD Form 214 and that he had completed 2 years, 9 months, and 6 days of prior active service for a total of 11 years, 5 months, and 17 days of active duty service (3 September 1974-19 February 1986).

6.  A review of his official records failed to reveal any additional active service that was not documented on his DD Form 214, dated 19 February 1986.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his service is not properly documented on his DD Form 214 has been noted and found to lack merit.

2.  The applicant initially enlisted on 3 September 1974 and served continuously until his discharge on 19 February 1986, which equates to 11 years, 5 months, and 17 days of service that is properly reflected in blocks 12c and 12d of his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that his DD Form 214 does not reflect all of his service.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to grant his request to have additional service added to his records.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018514



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018514



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022061

    Original file (20100022061.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 March 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022061 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides three DD Forms 214. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 February 1979 to show the date entered active duty this period as 1 March 1977.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009308

    Original file (20080009308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 214 that shows the applicant entered active duty this period on 31 March 1981 and was discharged on 7 February 1986. The evidence of record shows that the applicant initially served on active duty in the RA from 5 January 1973 through 16 December 1974 and that this period of honorable active duty service is documented in his military service records in the form of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 16 December 1974. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004620

    Original file (20140004620.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 16 November 1975 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) and 5 September 1981 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show active duty service (ADS) credit that was granted by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to correct his military service records. The Board found the applicant was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 November 1975 with 16 years, 3 months, and 26 days of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000938

    Original file (20080000938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to the following items of his 19 April 1985 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected: Item 11 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Years and Months in Specialty); Item 12 (Record of Service); Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized); Item 14 (Military Education); and Item 18 (Remarks). Item 18 contains the entries "Disability Rating 70%" and "Separated from Service on Temporary Records". ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019997

    Original file (20100019997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending on 10 July 1980, to show his total active service and awards. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 10 July 1980 the: * Korea Defense Service Medal *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013981

    Original file (20110013981.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 with separation date of 31 January 1995 * his orders, dated 4 November 1974, for his enlistment * Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Based on his DD Form 4, dated 4 November 1974, the date in item 15 of his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 30 August 1977 is incorrect. 04 01 28 (item 18c) + 00 00 26 (corrected item 18d) 04 02 24 (total) Therefore, the entry in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006404

    Original file (20140006404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * Self-authored statement * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 11 June 1992 * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record), dated 11 November 2012 * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 10 September 1971 * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), for the period ending 26 September 1977 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010157

    Original file (20140010157.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty this period on 2 March 1979 and he was discharged on 10 February 1983 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded because he served honorably in the RA from 1972 to 1981 and he had a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017381

    Original file (20110017381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the RA on 28 May 1971 and he was discharged on 24 January 1974 which is reflected on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 January 1974. Therefore, there is no basis for granting his request to amend his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 May 1985 to show his active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009051C070205

    Original file (20060009051C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that the Army is less likely now to punish individuals going through a divorce. The Board recommended the applicant's records be corrected to show he was eligible for a complete and unconditional separation from the military service at the time of his honorable discharge on 14 August 1977. On 11 January 1985, the applicant was issued Certifications of Military Service for his honorable service from 14 January 1972 through 13 August 1977.