Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018442
Original file (20090018442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018442 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his date of discharge on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).  

2.  The applicant states the date of discharge on his DD Form 214 shows 31 March 2009; however, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) did not audit his account until July 2009.  It was his understanding that he could not be discharged until everyone completed his paperwork.  He contends he could not have been discharged on 31 March 2009 if DFAS did not audit his records until July 2009.  

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:

* DD Form 214
* Military Pay Voucher
* DA Form 2139-E (Military Pay Voucher)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s complete military records are not available.  However, sufficient documents are available for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 March 2004.

3.  Special Court-Martial Order Number 170, dated 19 November 2008, shows the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial adjudged on 23 April 2007.  He was sentenced to a forfeiture of $867.00 pay for 6 months, confinement for 6 months, and a bad conduct discharge.  The court-martial order indicated the confinement had been served and the bad conduct discharge would be executed.

4.  The applicant was discharged on 31 March 2009.  Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry “2009 03 31.”

5.  The applicant’s Military Pay Voucher shows DFAS audited his military pay records on 11 June 2009 and 16 August 2009.  

6.  His Military Pay Voucher also shows his original expiration term of service (ETS) date was 7 March 2008 and he was confined beyond his ETS.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214 and is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  It directs that the separation date is the Soldier’s transition date. This date may not be the contractual date if Soldier is separated early, voluntarily extends, or is extended for make up of lost time, or retained on active duty for the convenience of the Government.

8.  The DFAS website describes the three functions of the Debt Establishment Branch as follows:

	a.  Audit pay accounts of separated members from the active and Reserve forces who have a debt at separation and notify the members if the debt is valid.

	b.  Process adjustments to the Master Military Pay Accounts of separated and indebted members on the Defense Joint Military Pay System, Active Component.

	c.  Establish individual out-of-service debts for installation delinquent debts.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 shows his date of discharge as 31 March 2009 but DFAS did not audit his account until July 2009.  However, the purpose for audits is to assess pay records on separated members who have a debt at separation and does not impact the date of discharge.  
2.  The applicant’s Military Pay Voucher from DFAS show he was confined beyond his normal ETS date and he was discharged on 31 March 2009.  Therefore, no error or injustice exists regarding the applicant’s date of discharge and there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018442



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018442



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140001718

    Original file (AR20140001718.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his expiration term of service (ETS) date be changed. This DA Form 2139-E, dated 7 June 2010, with attached Leave and Earnings Statements (LESs) shows DFAS audit details of the applicant's pay account, which showed a new debt at the time of $12,054.43. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by completing an appropriate document showing his ETS date was changed to 25 July 2011 for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000264

    Original file (20150000264.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he received a letter from DFAS indicating he was AWOL during the period 18 October 2009 through 23 February 2010 and this is incorrect * he was honorably discharged from the Army at Fort Bliss, TX * he signed out from the transition center on 9 September 2009 and started his transition leave – he was issued his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * his period of transition leave was from 10 September 2009 through 10 November 2009 * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009096

    Original file (20090009096.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Counsel requests correction of the applicant’s records to show he was entitled to receive the $44,132.65 that he was initially paid. In the alternative, the applicant and his counsel contend that the applicant should be granted a waiver of the debt or, if the claims were erroneously paid based on improper receipts or documentation, the records should be corrected to show the applicant provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010226

    Original file (20130010226.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests relief of recoupment of $5,103.45 under the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) for the period 2001 to 2004. In the 24 April 2013 memorandum, the CAARNG stated the applicant was eligible for 4 payments of $787.50 for a total of $3,150. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing a request to allow payment of the total SLRP amount paid on the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015207

    Original file (20100015207.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a letter from DFAS informing him on 23 December 2009 that he had a debt from his active duty military pay account for overpayment of military pay or allowances related to his BAH (VHA) entitlement for the period 30 May 2008 to 10 June 2009. This form would then allow DFAS to correct his active duty military pay account to show he was entitled to BAH (VHA) for Hawaii from 9 February to his date of separation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021583

    Original file (20120021583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Upon his discharge from the Army, DFAS audited his pay records between May 2002 and September 2007, although he was discharged in 2004. It appears he contested/disputed this debt with DFAS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010811

    Original file (20100010811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He contends he never took excess leave and DFAS has never shown what days they considered to be excess leave. Subsequently, DFAS responded and informed the applicant his claim had been audited twice by Reserve pay and they would not do it again. DFAS records show the following debt collections in 2005 and 2006 (totaling $7,521.70): * Overpayment of basic pay and pay and allowances for 14-15 April 2005 - $484.45 * Leave period from 17 March 2005 to 1 April 2005 - $4,344.37 * Reimbursement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009365

    Original file (20080009365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080009365 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's discharge orders were published by the Army Reserve Medical Command in Florida on 19 November 2007, which is the same date as his effective date of discharge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders Number 07-323-00012, dated 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022462

    Original file (20120022462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Overall, several errors were committed in relation to her pay in December 1998 and then her retirement formula, computation of her retired pay, the length of time she was placed on the TDRL, and the more recent debt that occurred as a result of an audit of her pay records by DFAS. The applicant provides: * Self-authored breakdown of each LES * Listing of what appears to be her credit report * Divorce decree * Audit Request Form * Letter, dated 3 August 2009, from DFAS * Letter, dated 22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018115

    Original file (20140018115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his leave balance and repayment of 2.5 leave days charged after retirement. He had a leave balance of 54 days and earned 5 days (from October to November 2013) for a balance of 59 days. The debt is due to leave he took from 1 October 2013 to 30 November 2013 resulting in a negative leave balance of 2.5 days which includes a non-accrual of 0.5 days.