Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018242
Original file (20090018242.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  11 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018242 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the entry "SEPARATION PAY - - $7,035.60" be removed from his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 12 September 2008.

2.  The applicant states he did not receive separation payment because he was not entitled to separation pay.  He states the entry needs to be removed because the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is proposing to recoup all of his VA compensation (minus the amount of Federal income tax withheld) until the amount is paid back.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, his discharge orders, and a letter from the VA.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 October 2006 for a period of 3 years.  He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of 88M (Motor Transport Operator).

2.  On 10 June 2008, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found the applicant physically unfit for duty by reason of asthma.  The PEB found his condition not to be service aggravated as his asthma had been improved by military medical care but not sufficient enough to retain him in the service.  The PEB found the condition to be unfitting but not compensable.  The PEB recommended the applicant be separated from the service without disability benefits.

3.  On 12 September 2008, the applicant was discharged by reason of a disability that existed prior to service as determined by a PEB.  He had completed 1 year, 10 months, and 27 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.  He was assigned the separation program designator (SPD) code of "JFM."  Item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 contains the entry "SEPARATION PAY - - $7,035.60."

4.  An electronic mail from Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) states the SPD code "JFM" shows the individual is not entitled to disability severance pay or any type of separation pay.

5.  The letter, dated 28 August 2009, from the VA, addressed to the applicant, states the VA proposed to recoup all of his VA compensation effective 
1 December 2009 (minus the amount of Federal income tax withheld) until the amount is paid back.  The letter states the information is verified by the entry on his DD Form 214.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the separation program designator "JFM" as shown on the applicantÂ’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as "Disability, Existed Prior to Service PEB." 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he did not receive any separation pay and the entry indicating he received separation pay should be removed from his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant was discharged based on PEB findings of physical unfitness due to asthma that existed prior to service.  The condition was not service aggravated.  The PEB recommended discharge without disability benefits.

3.  The SPD code on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged for a condition that existed prior to service.  DFAS stated he was not entitled to any separation pay based on his SPD code of "JFM."

4.  The preponderance of evidence in this case indicates the applicant was not entitled to disability severance pay or any other severance pay.  There is no evidence of the applicant having received separation pay.  Therefore, it is appropriate to remove the entry "SEPARATION PAY - - $7,035.60" from item 18 of his DD Form 214.  

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry "SEPARATION PAY - - $7,035.60" from item 18 of his 
DD Form 214.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018242



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018242



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001588

    Original file (20140001588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) withheld $15,588.84 from her disability pay because of the amount of separation pay on file at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) * the amount of separation pay on record is incorrect * she believes the amount of money paid to her for unused accrued leave was arbitrarily combined with her separation pay and is in error * she does not recall receiving $15,588.84 and this amount plus money for her unused leave...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005039

    Original file (20150005039.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 November 2014, the USAPDA issued the applicant a DA Form 199-2 (Revised PEB Proceedings) showing his disability rating for sleep apnea and directing his medical retirement retroactive to 23 April 2000, the date he was discharged by reason of disability with entitlement to severance pay. In November 2014, the USAPDA corrected the applicant's records and indicated that the CoFC (File Number 07-328C) directed his previous disability findings be amended to reflect permanent disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020581

    Original file (20130020581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows an entitlement to separation pay; however, he didn't receive the money. They do not show an entitlement to/payment of separation pay. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant received payment of separation pay at the time of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016367

    Original file (20090016367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was discharged on 7 April 1996 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(3) by reason of physical disability with entitlement to severance pay. The applicantÂ’s pay records at DFAS confirm he had a $15,579.82 debt at the time of his discharge. The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which confirms he did not receive his disability severance pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005191

    Original file (20090005191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, Soldiers will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or their reason for discharge. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator [SPD] Codes) provides, in pertinent part, that the reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and their corresponding SPD codes will be entered on the Soldiers' DD Forms 214. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018215

    Original file (20140018215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for reconsideration of his previous case, in which he contends the Board incorrectly stated his medical conditions and the reason for his discharge, was carefully considered. On 10 January 1972, he was determined to be permanently unfit for duty by reason of physical disability, removed from the TDRL, and discharged from the service with entitlement to severance pay. Since there is no historical evidence of his VA compensation awards and effective dates, there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496

    Original file (20140011496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018547

    Original file (20070018547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined that he was medically unfit and recommended separating him for disability with severance pay. The applicant underwent a PEB that determined he was physically unfit and recommended his separation for disability with severance pay. Evidence of record shows that the applicant did not receive the severance pay indicated on his separation orders or his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011313

    Original file (20090011313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from "disability, existed prior to service (EPTS), physical evaluation board (PEB)" to "disability." The SPD code "JFM" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b (physical disability existing prior to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004406

    Original file (20120004406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Senator regarding the applicant's SSB recoupment from his military retired pay account. (3) Issue Three: DODFMR, Volume 7B, Chapter 4, subparagraph 040602 B, further states no recoupment of SSB is required, regardless of when paid, if the disability for which the member receives DVA compensation was incurred or aggravated during a period of later active duty. There is no evidence in his records and he did not provide any evidence that shows DFAS has recouped an inappropriate amount of...