Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018215
Original file (20090018215.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  20 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018215 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states his award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is not listed on his DD Form 214.  The applicant further states that his name is currently listed on a military site from the internet that indicates he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and a five-page document taken from the internet entitled "1st Battalion, 6th Infantry List by Unit - 1967/68" showing awards awarded to unit members.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 October 1966 and successfully completed basic combat and advanced individual training. He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam on 4 October 1967 and was assigned to
B Company, 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry, 198th Infantry Brigade.  He departed Vietnam on 19 September 1968 after being credited with participating in four campaigns.

4.  On 21 September 1968, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 after completing 1 year, 11 months, and
19 days of creditable active service with no time lost.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14) Bar, and two overseas service bars.

6.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  His records do not contain any adverse information and his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service.  There is also no record of a commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than
3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows that, at the time of the applicant’s assignment to the 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry, it was cited for award of the Valorous Unit Award for the period 7 February 1968 through 11 February 1968 based on Headquarters, Department of the Army, General Orders Number 73, dated 1968.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, paragraph 6d (Miscellaneous Information) also shows that DAGO Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command, and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Table B-1 contains a list of Vietnam campaigns, and it shows that during the applicant's tour in Vietnam, he participated in the following campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase III (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968)
* Tet Counteroffensive (30 January 1968 - 1 April 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase IV (2 April 1968 - 30 June 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase V (1 July 1968 - 1 November 1968)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was released from active duty in the rank of SGT with nearly two years of creditable active service with no time lost and "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service.  There is also no record of any adverse action or a commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, it appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
3 October 1966 through 21 September 1968.

2.  He participated in four campaigns during his tour in Vietnam which makes him eligible for four bronze service stars to be worn on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be amended accordingly.

3.  The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period of time the unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award.  All units in Vietnam were also awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be amended to add these unit awards.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal,

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
3 October 1966 through 21 September 1968, and

	c.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, Valorous Unit Award, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018215



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018215



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004697

    Original file (20120004697.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. DAGO Number 73 of 1968 and Army Pamphlet 672-3 both show that the applicant's unit, 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry Regiment is authorized the Valorous Unit Award, but not the Presidential Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013283

    Original file (20100013283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015194

    Original file (20130015194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * General Orders (GO) Number 1533, dated 5 April 1967 (DFC) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004422C070208

    Original file (20040004422C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that a Bronze Star Medal (BSM) he was awarded be added to his separation document (DD Form 214). Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 26 of his 31...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003537

    Original file (20090003537.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 16 March 1968; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 2 August 1967 to 6 August 1968; c. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the entries "1st Class Gunner Marksman Badge" and "Expert Badge with Rifle Bar"; and d. showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017970

    Original file (20100017970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. Army Regulation 635-5 establishes that item 14 of the DD Form 214 shows education and training completed during the period covered by the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 26 of his final DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and Overseas Service Ribbon (2); b. amending item 5 to read "390330"; c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009944

    Original file (20110009944.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 29 (Qualification in Arms) he qualified: * Sharpshooter with the M-14 Rifle on 29 April 1966 * Expert with the M-60 Machinegun on 7 July 1966 * Sharpshooter with the M-16 Automatic Rifle on 1 July 1966 b. item 31 (Foreign Service) Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 13 September 1966 through 21 August 1968; c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to the: (1) 68th Assault Helicopter Company, from 27 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003135

    Original file (20150003135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 also shows in: * Item 11d (Effective Date (of Separation)) the entry NA * Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Meritorious Unit Commendation * Vietnam Service Medal * Purple Heart * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * Parachutist Badge * 2 overseas service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019178

    Original file (20140019178.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows the – * National Defense Service Medal * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) 6. The evidence of record shows: a. general orders awarded the applicant the – * ARCOM * AGCM (1st Award) b. the applicant qualified for award of the VSM and he participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003776

    Original file (20130003776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and two awards of the Air Medal (AM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26...