BOARD DATE: 13July 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090018099
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) spouse-only coverage.
2. The applicant states she should be paid the SBP annuity the FSM earned during his military service.
3. The applicant provides the following documents in support of her request:
* 15 pages of Kaiser Permanente medical documents
* an authenticated copy of marriage record
* a death certificate
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The FSM's military records show he was born on 29 March 1951. On 25 February 1970, he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG). He continued to serve in an enlisted status through 24 February 1974.
2. On 25 February 1974, the FSM was appointed a commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant in the ARNG. The FSM and the applicant were married on 12 October 1974.
3. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows the FSM was transferred from the ARNG to the U.S. Army Reserve on 14 June 1980. On 22 January 1987, he was promoted to major.
4. On 24 September 1993, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center issued a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter) to the FSM. This notification informed the FSM that he had completed the required years of service necessary to qualify to receive retired pay at age 60 upon application. Paragraph 4 of this notification informed the FSM that by law, he had to complete his initial DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) within 90 calendar days from the date of receipt of the 20-year letter and if he failed to make his election within 90 days, he would not be allowed to obtain SBP coverage until he applied for retired pay at age 60.
5. The 20-year letter further informed the FSM that if he did not elect coverage and died prior to reaching age 60, there would be no benefits for his spouse and that more detailed information concerning participating in the RCSBP and a blank DD Form 1883 were enclosed.
6. There is no evidence in the FSM's military personnel records jacket, Defense Finance and Accounting Service record, or independent evidence which indicates the FSM ever completed a DD Form 1883 electing to enroll in the RCSBP.
7. The FSM was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 4 December 1994.
8. On 3 September 2008, the FSM died at the age of 57. The death certificate shows he was married to the applicant at the time.
9. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to elect SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. Under the law in effect at the time, a member was required to make the RCSBP election within 90 days of receiving the 20-year letter or else wait until he or she applied for retired pay at age 60 and elect to participate in the standard SBP.
10. Public Law 106-398, enacted 30 October 2000, required written spousal consent for a Reserve service member to be able to delay making an RCSBP election until age 60; the default election when an election form was not submitted or is not on file is option C. This law is applicable to cases where the 20-year letter was issued after 1 January 2001.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that she is entitled to an RCSBP annuity based on the death of her husband was carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. By law and regulation, Soldiers who complete 20 or more qualifying years are issued a 20-year letter that informs them of their retirement eligibility and offers them the opportunity to enroll in the RCSBP. The law in effect at the time required the Soldier to make an election and return the enrollment form within 90 days of receipt. If the election was not submitted within the 90-day period, the member deferred the opportunity to enroll in the program until he or she applied for retired pay at age 60. If the member died before reaching age 60, the spouse was authorized no SBP benefits.
3. The evidence of record confirms the FSM was notified by memorandum
(20-year letter), which included a DD Form 1883, that he had become eligible for a Reserve retirement upon reaching age 60. He was notified of the requirement for him to submit an RCSBP election within 90 days and that if he failed to submit his election form, he would not be eligible to enroll in the SBP until he applied for retired pay at age 60 and his spouse would receive no SBP annuity if he died before reaching age 60. Therefore, absent evidence to the contrary, it is presumed the FSM received the notification, was aware of the RCSBP enrollment requirement, and simply elected not to enroll in the RCSBP.
4. Although there is no evidence that the applicant was notified of the FSM's failure to enroll in the RCSBP, the law in effect at the time had no requirement for her to be notified that the FSM did not enroll in the RCSBP. Further, the current law requiring spousal concurrence was not implemented until 1 January 2001. As a result, the applicant not being notified of the FSM's failure to enroll was not a material error at the time because spousal concurrence was not required and the lack of notification to the applicant would not have affected the FSM's enrollment (non-enrollment) choice at the time.
5. The FSM's failure to respond within 90 days of receiving his 20-year letter and RCSBP notification constituted an election not to participate in the RCSBP and neither spousal notification nor concurrence was required for a Reserve member to delay an RCSBP election until age 60 under the existing law at the time. As a result, given there is no evidence that the FSM intended to enroll in the RCSBP prior to reaching age 60, the applicant was not eligible to receive an SBP annuity based on the death of the FSM prior to reaching age 60. Accordingly, the applicant has failed to meet her burden of proof and as a result is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ___x_____ ___x___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
___________x______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018099
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018099
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008184
Counsel also indicates that the record is equally clear that pursuant to Public Law, the applicant was never informed, told, or advised that she had a vested interest in her husband's military retirement and that the FSM had failed to make an election or that he had elected less than full coverage, and that this fact is sufficient to set aside the Board's original decision and to enter a new decision granting and approving the applicant's request for SBP annuity benefits. There is no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011148C080407
The applicant further states that the FSM's original Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Letter (20-Year Letter) and Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate (DD Form 1883) were not found in his records; however, she found copies of his 20 January 1999 20-Year Letter and an Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPERSCOM) Letter, dated 22 March 2000, which notified her that the FSM had failed to submit a DD Form 1883 within the prescribed timeframe and that she was therefore...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030267
The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's record to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and elected her as the beneficiary. There is no evidence in the FSM's official military personnel file (OMPF), Defense Finance and Accounting Service record, or independent evidence which indicates the FSM ever completed a DD Form 1883 to enroll in the RCSBP. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008240
There is no evidence of record or independent evidence which indicates the FSM ever completed a DD Form 1883 or a DD Form 2656 (SBP Election Change Certificate) electing to enroll in the RCSBP and/or that he elected "spouse only" coverage. Under the law in effect at the time, a member was required to make the RCSBP election within 90 days of receiving the 20-year letter or wait until he or she applied for retired pay at age 60 and elect to participate in the standard SBP. If he failed to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003941
20 November 2013, by letter, HRC responded to the applicant and stated by law, the FSM had 90 days from the date he received his 20-year letter to submit DD Form 1883. Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for RC members who qualified for Reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60 and eligible to participate in the SBP, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The FSM's records do not indicate that he elected to participate...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004712
The applicant provides copies of: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period 17 July 1974 to 14 July 1978 * Marriage License for the FSM and applicant, dated 8 July 1989 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter), dated 16 September 1996 * Memorandum, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Personnel Command, subject: Expiration Term of Service (ETS), dated 16 May 1998 * U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Form 249 (Chronological Statement of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002790C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse only coverage. Records at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command - St. Louis indicate that the FSM's records did not contain a DD Form 1883. The FSM's 20-year letter was issued in 1993.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082594C070215
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017403
The case corrected the military records of an FSM to show the applicant (the FSM's spouse) was entitled to an RCSBP annuity effective the date following the FSM's death. There was no evidence the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 or that the spouse was informed the FSM could participate in the RCSBP. The evidence of record shows the FSM received his Twenty-Year Letter with the accompanying SBP forms in June 2000. a.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000361
The applicant provides copies of their marriage certificate; the FSM's death certificate; the FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); the FSM's Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60; the FSM's Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPC) Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points); and a memorandum, dated 21 April 2009. There is no evidence in the FSM's military personnel records that shows he submitted an application to...