Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018072
Original file (20090018072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	 04 May 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018072 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his reentry eligibility (RE) code be changed from 4R to 3R so he can reenter the Army.

2.  The applicant states:

* he believes his RE code is incorrect
* a recruiter told him in order to enlist, his RE code needs to be 3R
* he does not understand why the RE code is 4R which pertains to service members with 20 years of service
* he participated in the early retirement program after serving 15 years and 9 months of service
* he and the recruiter agree his RE code should be 3R based on his total service

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 April 1979.  He served as a combat engineer and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments.  On 31 January 1995, he retired in the rank of sergeant first class under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 12, for voluntary early retirement.  He had served a total of 15 years, 9 months, and 21 days of creditable active service.

3.  Item 25 (Separation Authority) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the entry "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12."  Item 26 (Separation Code) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "RBE."  Item 27 (Reentry Code) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "4R."  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "voluntary early retirement."

4.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD's to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code RBE is voluntary early retirement and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve and includes a list of the RA RE codes:

   a.  RE-4R applies to Soldiers who retired for length of service with 15 or more years of active Federal service.

	b.  RE-3R is not an authorized code.

6.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated September 1993, shows that Soldiers given an SPD of RBE were given an RE code of 4R.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant's RE code was assigned based on the fact he retired with over 15 years of active Federal service.  The RE code associated with this type of separation is an RE-4R.  Therefore, the applicant received the appropriate RE code associated with his retirement.

2.  The applicant's RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of his separation.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018072



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018072



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067937C070402

    Original file (2002067937C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009913

    Original file (20070009913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001570

    Original file (20070001570.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be corrected by changing his reentry code (RE Code) from 4R to allow return to active duty. The applicant's records show that he enlisted on active duty on 6 October 1977 for a period of 3 years. The May 1994 message implementing the Fiscal Year 1995 Regular Army Enlisted Early Retirement Program listed MOS 51H at the staff sergeant/pay grade E-6 level and with a minimum of 15 years of creditable active duty service (as of 31 August 1995) as eligible for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016189

    Original file (20100016189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A disability rating of 30% or higher as determined by the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) entitles a Soldier to retirement benefits. The PEB thus determined she was physically unfit for further military service and recommended separation with entitlement to severance pay. Her narrative reason for separation and her separation code were assigned based on the fact that she was retired under the provisions of chapter 12 of Army Regulation 635-200 under the TERA program subsequent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028826

    Original file (20100028826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would like his DD Form 214 to show the proper disability rating at the time of his retirement. The applicant provides his DD Form 214, dated 31 December 2001, and a DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings). His DD Form 214 appropriately shows he was retired on 31 December 2001 for the purpose of early retirement under TERA with a type of separation of "Voluntary Early Retirement"; a separation authority of "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12"; a separation code of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000871

    Original file (20090000871.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23 (Type of Separation) of the applicant's DD Form 214 issued on 31 August 2007 shows his separation was for retirement under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 12. Table 3-1 contains a list of the Regular Army RE codes and shows that RE code 4R applies to a Soldier who retired after completing 15 or more years of active Federal service. While the applicant's reasons for voluntarily requesting retirement upon completion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015777

    Original file (20140015777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 May 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140015777 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing in the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard. SPD code RBD applies to Soldiers retired for sufficient service for retirement and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102130C070208

    Original file (2004102130C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his separation document (DD Form 214). Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show he was assigned an RE-4R code to denote his separation was based on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009371

    Original file (20130009371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's RE code was assigned based on his retirement from active duty. The SPD code was the appropriate code based on the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 12. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024892

    Original file (20100024892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 April 2010, the applicant was removed from the TDRL and discharged from the service with severance pay because of permanent physical disability with a disability rating of 20%. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Although the applicant was properly...