Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018016
Original file (20090018016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090018016 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he declined participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

2.  The applicant states that he was enrolled in the SBP by someone else against his wishes because of a clerical error on his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel).

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:

* DD Form 2656
* Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter)
* retirement orders
* spousal consent statement

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 21 January 1949.

2.  The applicant's record does not include a copy of his marriage certificate or any other document to show the date of his marriage.

3.  After having prior active duty and Reserve Component service, the applicant enlisted in the Oregon Army National Guard on 18 January 1980.  He was issued a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter) on 12 February 1998.  There is no evidence to show he made an RCSBP election at that time.

4.  The applicant continuously served in the Oregon Army National Guard until he was honorably discharged on 25 March 1998 and transferred to the Retired Reserve.  The National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record Service) he was issued on the date of his discharge shows he completed a total of 24 years, 1 month, and 22 days of creditable military service.

5.  In conjunction with his application for retired pay, the applicant completed and signed a DD Form 2656 on 28 April 2008.  He placed an "X" in the second block of item 26g indicating that he did have eligible dependents under the plan.  He did not place an "X" beside the first block of item 26g which states, "I ELECT NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN SBP."  His spouse signed the DD Form 2656 on 25 February 2008 under section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) to indicate she concurred with the SBP decision made by her spouse.

6.  On 2 March 2010, a Defense Finance and Accounting Service official confirmed that the applicant was transferred to the retired rolls on 21 January 2009, his 60th birthday.  He also stated the applicant's SBP election was invalid and, as a result, defaulted to automatic coverage.

7.  By a 25 May 2010 letter, the Board analyst advised the applicant to provide an up-to-date concurrence with his cancellation request from his spouse.  His spouse provided a notarized statement on 18 June 2010, indicating she concurred with the applicant's election not to participate in the SBP.

8.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.

9.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; and (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  Under the law in effect at the time, a member was required to make the RCSBP election within 90 days of receiving the 20-year letter or else wait until he or she applied for retired pay at age 60 and elect to participate in the standard SBP.

10.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

11.  Public Law 106-398, enacted 30 October 2000, required written spousal consent for a Reserve service member to be able to delay making an RCSBP election until age 60.  The default election when an election form was not submitted or is not on file is option C.  This law is applicable to cases where the 20-year letter was issued after 1 January 2001.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he elected not participate in the SBP.

2.  It appears the applicant did not make an RCSBP election upon receipt of his 20-year letter.  Under the law then in effect, his failure to make an election, which did not require spousal concurrence, deferred his ultimate SBP election until he reached age 60 and applied for retired pay at that time.

3.  The applicant completed and signed a DD Form 2656 on 28 April 2008.  However, even though his spouse concurred, he did not place an "X" in the first block of DD Form 2656 indicating he declined participation in the SBP.  As a result, he was automatically enrolled in the SBP.

4.  The applicant's spouse provided an up-to-date concurrence with his cancellation request of his SBP election.

5.  It appears that it was the applicant's and his spouse's intent to decline participation in the SBP.  Therefore, as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to amend the applicant's DD Form 2656 to show he declined to participate in the SBP in a timely manner and to refund him any paid premiums.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ___X___  __X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 2656 of the individual concerned be amended to show he and his spouse signed the form in a timely manner declining to participate in the SBP and it was received and accepted for processing by the appropriate office, thus resulting in his never being enrolled in the SBP and being due a refund of all SBP premiums paid.



      __________X__________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018016



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090018016



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017787

    Original file (20130017787.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child only, if applicable) coverage. Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows the applicant's 20-year letter was dated 7 August 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000922

    Original file (20120000922.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the date in item 3 (Retirement/Transfer Date) of a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) and correction of her record to stop participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Reservists who elect option A are required to make an SBP election when applying for retired pay at age 60. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the 6 August 2009 DD Form 2656...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011042

    Original file (20090011042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011042 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The iPERMS record does not contain copies of his retirement orders, any SBP election forms, or any other documentation dated after the 20-year letter issue date. The DD Form 2656 provided by the applicant is dated 27 August 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011481

    Original file (20080011481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to reflect that she elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that she be reimbursed for all of the deductions from her retired pay. Additionally, the applicant has not submitted any current verification of her spouse's concurrence or non-concurrence with her desire to correct her records to show she elected not to participate in the SBP; therefore, it would not be appropriate for the Board to make the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002540

    Original file (20090002540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and that she receive reimbursement for any and all deductions from her retirement pay. The 20-Year Letter, dated 28 July 2004, also stated that "NOTE: Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, requires that upon receipt of this Letter, a qualified Reserve Component member, who is married, will automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001114

    Original file (20090001114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show that she declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that she receive a refund for all SBP premiums taken from her retired pay. The applicant states that she did not request the SBP deduction and her spouse signed her application for retirement indicating he knew he would not receive SBP benefits. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s 20-year letter was dated 5 May 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004221

    Original file (20130004221.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior to a DA Form 2656-5 (RCSBP Election Certificate) being submitted to DFAS, it was altered with whiteout to show the FSM declined to make a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election until age 60 instead of it showing he elected an immediate annuity with spouse-only coverage. Evidence of record shows that the FSM completed a DA Form 2656-5 and elected not to participate in spousal RCSBP coverage and that his spouse concurred with the election on 1 June 2007. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003735

    Original file (20140003735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and payment of the SBP annuity based on the FSM's death. Section X (Spouse Concurrence) states (in part) "If the member selects Option A (declining to make an election until age 60), and the spouse concurs, no annuity will be payable if the member dies prior to reaching age 60." As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008270

    Original file (20090008270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier request that her military records be corrected to show she elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that she be reimbursed for all of the deductions from her retired pay. The applicant provides a DD Form 2656-2 (SBP Termination Request), dated 1 May 2009. Although the applicant's spouse concurred with her SBP election on the DD Form 2656, this form reflects that the applicant made no SBP beneficiary election and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017403

    Original file (20110017403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The case corrected the military records of an FSM to show the applicant (the FSM's spouse) was entitled to an RCSBP annuity effective the date following the FSM's death. There was no evidence the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 or that the spouse was informed the FSM could participate in the RCSBP. The evidence of record shows the FSM received his Twenty-Year Letter with the accompanying SBP forms in June 2000. a.