Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017985
Original file (20090017985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	 23 March 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017985 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval of an Army National Guard (ARNG) accession bonus.

2.  The applicant states an administrative error by the Tennessee ARNG keeps him from receiving an accession bonus.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his request, copies of a 16 February 2009 letter from a Tennessee ARNG Officer Strength Manager; a 17 September 2008 appointment order; a 24 July 1998 Academic Evaluation Report; a 
25 March 1994 Academic Evaluation Report; a 26 March 1999 Academic Evaluation Report; an undated Officer Accession Bonus Addendum; NGB Form 0122E (National Guard Bureau Announcement of Federal Recognition in the Tennessee ARNG), dated 11 December 2008; an undated Officer Affiliation Bonus Addendum; NGB Memorandum, dated 29 April 2009; 8 pages of email messages; and an undated NGB Form 600-7-4-R-E (Annex B to DD Form 4 Enlisted Affiliation Bonus Army National of the United States).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, a career Reserve Component Soldier, served as an enlisted member from 1981.  He earned a bachelor's degree in 1985 and a master's in 1991.  He was commissioned in 1993 in the U.S. Army Reserve.  He received a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty Year Letter), dated 
12 September 2001, but continued to participate and accrue qualifying years.  

2.  In May 2008 he applied for Federal recognition as an ARNG officer.  It was approved on 17 September 2008.  Effective that date, the applicant was transferred from the Individual Ready Reserve and appointed a captain in the Tennessee ARNG.

3.  The documents submitted with this application show:

	a.  The Tennessee ARNG Officer Strength Manager, a first lieutenant, states that he failed to properly complete the paper work for the applicant's accession bonus.  He takes full responsibility for the applicant not receiving the applicable bonus.

	b.  Both of the bonus addenda have been signed by the Officer Strength Manager as a witness and by the applicant.  However, both are incomplete in that neither was dated by either of those officers.  Neither copy is signed by an approving official and neither carries a bonus control number.

	c.  The 27 April 2009 NGB memorandum indicates that a second review of the applicant's request for an exception to policy in this case also resulted in disapproval.  It noted that the applicant signed the agreement some 30 to 50 days after he became a member of the ARNG and that, by regulation, the program was not retroactive.

	d.  The various emails discuss the details of the case and mostly encourage the applicant to submit an application to this Board.

4.  An advisory opinion from the NGB recommended denial of the application because there is no supporting evidence that they were prepared prior to the applicant's actual accession.

5.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion.  No response was received. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states an administrative error by the Tennessee ARNG keeps him from receiving the accession bonus.

2.  The available evidence is unconvincing.  The NGB staff are convinced the bonus addenda were executed after the fact.  Clearly, they are incomplete.

3.  Given the applicant's years of experience, he knew or should have known that all applicable paper work needed to be properly completed prior to the fact.  It is improbable that an experienced individual would consider such incomplete contracts to be binding and to act accordingly.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X__  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017985





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017985



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000266

    Original file (20140000266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of an Officer Accession Bonus (OAB) of $10,000.00 in accordance with Army National Guard (ARNG) Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Guidance Policy Number 10-01. On 10 July 2013, the NGB ARNG Deputy G-1 denied the request for an exception to policy for the applicant to retain the $10,000.00 OAB offered at the time of the applicant's completion of WOBC on 23 August 2012. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018947

    Original file (20110018947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In June 2011, he received an email stating the NGB had again denied his request and he was told he could file a claim with the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) if he believed an error or injustice still existed. When the applicant graduated from OCS and was accessed into the WVARNG, it was the applicant's understanding that he was eligible for the $10,000.00 OAB after completing BOLC. Attached to the memorandum was an OAB addendum signed by the applicant on 12 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008156

    Original file (20140008156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the correct copy of the OAB Addendum was discovered after the denial of his exception to policy by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) * the incomplete addendum was initially provided in the Guard Incentive Management System for payment submission * the Officer Strength Manager, who also was the witnessing official, discovered the correct addendum * after the correct addendum was submitted, another discrepancy was discovered in relation to the area of concentration...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023607

    Original file (20100023607.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of a $10,000.00 Officer Accession Bonus (OAB). In his exception to policy request for payment of the OAB, he stated that at the time of his accession into the Minnesota Army National Guard (MNARNG), the chaplain recruiter told him there was only one chaplain position remaining in the MNARNG with the 84th Troop Command. The applicant's records show he submitted an NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer) on 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015971

    Original file (20110015971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * ARNG Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) Policy memorandum * Request for exception to policy memorandum * Written Agreement OAB Addendum * Federal recognition orders, dated 12 September 2008 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) denial memorandum * Another Soldier's Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The memorandum states: * The applicant was commissioned on 17 May 2008 and he was eligible for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018238

    Original file (20130018238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States) * self-authored statements * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings AR20090007581, dated 16 June 2009 * OAB Agreement * 2 ETP Denial Letters, dated 7 June 2013 and 1 July 2013 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * NGB Form 22 * NGB Form 337 (Oaths of Office) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The NGB ETP denial letters both show: * the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010394

    Original file (20100010394.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 August 2009, the Adjutant General (AG) of the MNARNG sent a memorandum to the Chief of the Education, Incentives and Employment Division of the National Guard Bureau (NGB) requesting authorization for retroactive payment of OAB funds to Minnesota officers and warrant officers, through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, with written support of the Chief of the NGB. The AG stated, in effect, a significant population of his officer force, who were eligible for the OAB when...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010400

    Original file (20100010400.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, following his enlistment and subsequent appointment/commissioning in the MNARNG, he was informed he was eligible for a $10,000.00 Officer Accession Bonus. On 3 August 2009, the Adjutant General (AG) of the MNARNG sent a memorandum to the Chief of the Education, Incentives and Employment Division of the National Guard Bureau (NGB) requesting authorization for retroactive payment of OAB funds to Minnesota officers and warrant officers, through the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010401

    Original file (20100010401.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, following his enlistment and subsequent appointment/commissioning in the MNARNG, he was informed he was eligible for a $10,000.00 Officer Accession Bonus. The one officer completed the written agreement at the appropriate time, but the final administrative processing of the officer's paperwork did not get completed due to circumstances beyond the officer's control. The AG of the MNARNG requested an exception to policy and authorization for retroactive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010402

    Original file (20100010402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, following his enlistment and subsequent appointment/commissioning in the MNARNG, he was informed he was eligible for a $10,000.00 Officer Accession Bonus. The one officer completed the written agreement at the appropriate time, but the final administrative processing of the officer's paperwork did not get completed due to circumstances beyond the officer's control. The AG of the MNARNG requested an exception to policy and authorization for retroactive...