Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017847
Original file (20090017847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 22 April 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017847 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his temporary duty (TDY) assignments in Cambodia and Laos.

2.  The applicant states he was assigned to the 82nd Airborne Division and served in a TDY status approximately between July 1971 and June 1972.  He contends these assignments are not reflected in item 22c (Foreign and Sea Service) on his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 July 1970.  At the completion of required training, he was assigned to Troop A, 1st Squadron (Airborne), 17th Cavalry at Fort Bragg, NC.

3.  Block 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he served in Cambodia or Laos. 

4.  His service personnel records do not contain orders which indicate he served in a TDY status in Cambodia or Laos.  

5.  The applicant was released from active duty on 13 July 1973.  

6.  Item 22c on his DD Form 214 does not show he completed any foreign service.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The version in effect at the time directed that total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States performed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 would be entered in item 22c.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he served in a TDY status in Cambodia and Laos between July 1971 and June 1972.  However, the evidence of record does not support his claim.  

2.  The applicant’s service record does not contain orders which show he served in a TDY status in Cambodia and Laos.  Additionally, his DA Form 20 and 
DD Form 214 do not show he completed any foreign service.  

3.  In the absence of sufficient evidence, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017847



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017847



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007322

    Original file (20140007322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his Vietnam service and the Vietnam Service Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003619

    Original file (20130003619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show awards associated with his service in Vietnam. The applicant's record is void of any evidence to show he was assigned or attached to a unit in Vietnam, Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during his active duty or USAR service. The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004008

    Original file (20110004008.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the FSM served in Vietnam. Evidence of record shows the FSM served in Korea 1 year and 1 month. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend his DD Form 214 to show he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005279

    Original file (20120005279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant's unit served in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for the Vietnam Service Medal. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has provided no evidence which shows that while serving in Thailand he served in direct support of operations in Vietnam as defined by the awards regulation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002103

    Original file (20130002103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Item 24 shows he was authorized one overseas service bar; however, he served in Vietnam for three 6-month periods during this period of service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of this DD Form 214 to show he was authorized three overseas service bars.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009149

    Original file (20090009149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides, in support of his application, a statement of support from a former Soldier who attests to the applicant’s TDY (Temporary Duty) status in Vietnam, along with copies of his travel settlement documents, military pay voucher, and DD Form 214; a copy of his (the applicant's) DD Form 214; and a statement from a Veterans' Services Coordinator attesting to the believability of the supporting statement. The statement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007154

    Original file (20080007154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 August 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007154 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In addition, all the evidence provided is new evidence which will be considered by the Board. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal based on travel time between assignments in the Continental United Status while on active duty for training during the period 20 March 1967 through 19 July 1967.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016783

    Original file (20090016783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant requests his military records be corrected to show a combat duty assignment while assigned to Thailand and a TDY assignment in Vietnam in May 1968, the governing regulation states that there is no provision to show any assignment other than the unit of assignment upon separation on the DD Form 214. Therefore, his military records should be corrected to show the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017490

    Original file (20140017490.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his dates of service in the Republic of Vietnam and the awards and decorations to which he is entitled for that service. His record contains a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which shows in: a. item 29 (Qualification in Arms) shows he qualified as a Marksman with the M-60 machine gun and the M-16 rifle; b. item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007795

    Original file (20100007795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show a temporary duty (TDY) assignment in Vietnam. Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was appointed to the temporary rank of SP5, effective 13 December 1968. Although he provided unit orders which show he was appointed as an acting NCO to the grade of SGT on 11 July 1969, the entry in item 33 of his DA Form 20 shows his appointed grade to SGT was lined out.