Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017739
Original file (20090017739.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017739 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier appeal that his records show two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states that he is submitting new documentation that shows his 25 September 1959 summary court-martial was set aside.

3. The applicant provides Headquarters, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, Summary Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 18 January 1961.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090008476, dated 17 September 2009.

2.  The applicant now provides new evidence in support of his previous request that requires consideration.  He provides Headquarters, Fort Bragg, Summary Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 18 January 1961, that show his 25 September 1959 summary court-martial was set aside.  The order indicates that all rights, privileges, and property of which the applicant was deprived by virtue of the findings of guilty and the sentence so set aside were restored.  He was denied the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal due to the 25 September 1959 summary court-martial.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 May 1955.  On 21 February 1962, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaigns Ribbons or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he awarded the Parachutist Badge.

5.  Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service for the period 31 May 1955 through 21 February 1962.

6.  In his previous case, the ABCMR corrected the applicant's DD Form 214 to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 31 May 1955 through 30 May 1958, the Senior Parachutist Badge, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Expert Infantryman Badge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award).  He provided Headquarters, Fort Bragg, Summary Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 18 January 1961, that shows his 25 September 1959 summary court-martial was set aside.  Based upon this evidence, the order is accepted as sufficient to show he is eligible for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 31 May 1958 through 30 May 1961.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be amended to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award).

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20090008476 on 17 September 2009.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 31 May 1958 through 30 May 1961 and

	b.  amending his DD Form 214 to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award).



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017739



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017739



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008476

    Original file (20090008476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Good Conduct Medal, the Expert Infantryman Badge, and the Senior Parachutist Badge. Since the applicant's military records show his conduct and efficiency ratings were excellent during the period 31 May 1955 through 30 May 1958, it appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005064

    Original file (20120005064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show: * second award of the Bronze Star Medal * second award of the Combat Infantryman Badge * Croix de Guerre * four awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal * two service stars to be affixed to the Korean Service Medal * one service star to be affixed to the American Defense Service Medal * American Campaign Medal * marksmanship qualification badges 2. The applicant states: * the awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021194

    Original file (20120021194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The available records show the applicant received conduct and efficiency ratings of "good" during a portion of his active duty service which disqualified him from award of the AGCM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001661

    Original file (20110001661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-2, on 23 May 1955, for 3 years. Section 4 - Chronological Record of Military Service, of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings from 23 May 1955 through 15 August 1955. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010280

    Original file (20120010280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his enlisted service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006823

    Original file (20140006823.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ending on 8 November 1966, to show his service in Korea and Vietnam as well as awards of the: * National Defense Service Medal * Korean Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * United Nations Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * Bronze Star Medal 2. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 7 months and 16 days of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085591C070212

    Original file (2003085591C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) for the period 17 March 1953 to 4 March 1957 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the United Nations Service Medal, the Korean Service Medal, the First Class Artillery Badge and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Antiaircraft Artillery Bar as authorized awards in Section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations). Based on his service from 17 March 1953 through 17 May 1955, the applicant is entitled to award of the National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002252

    Original file (20080002252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be amended to show the awards of the National Defense Service Medal, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the Army Good Conduct Medal. However, it does not show the awards of the National Defense Service Medal, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, and the Army Good Conduct Medal. Evidence shows the applicant is authorized the award of the National Defense Service Medal for honorable active service between the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001850

    Original file (20110001850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's military service records do not contain a DD Form 214 for the period of service from 20 January 1953 through 27 November 1955. The applicant's military personnel record does not contain any orders or other evidence showing he was recommended for or awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (2nd Award). The evidence of record shows that during the period of service: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485

    Original file (20090020485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...