Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017732
Original file (20090017732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  6 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017732 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he held MOS 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) and served as security police during combat in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  He believes his combat time warrants award of the CIB.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract-Armed Force of the United States), DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), and Letter Orders Number 09-1290859 (Discharge from the USAR). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 October 1969.  He was trained in and awarded MOS 11B.

3.  The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

* in item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to Vietnam with Company B, 6th Battalion, 31st Infantry, 3rd Infantry Brigade, with duty MOS 11B (Rifleman) from 2 July 1970 - 11 September 1970
* in item 38 he was assigned to Vietnam with the 13th Security Platoon, Detachment 1 with duty MOS 11B (Security Guard) from 12 September 1970 - 2 June 1971
* in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no evidence that he was awarded the CIB

4.  The applicant's record is void of any documentation showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action or received any decorations for valor or gallantry in combat action during his service in the RVN.

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 7 June 1971.  The CIB is not listed on his DD Form 214.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry and warrant officers and enlisted personnel who have an infantry MOS.  Individuals must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for award of the CIB was carefully considered but not supported by the evidence in this case.

2.  The applicant was assigned to an infantry unit for 2 months until he was transferred to a Security Platoon.

3.  The applicant's infantry MOS and his short assignment to an infantry unit in the RVN are not in question.  However, there is no evidence in the available records showing he was an active participant in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit.  In the absence of evidence that he actively participated in ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the CIB in this case.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017732





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017732



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009921

    Original file (20100009921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record the applicant served in active ground combat during his tour in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and as a result concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, there is no indication he was ever assigned to an infantry staff headquarters or to non-infantry duties during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, and given his unit regularly participated in combat operations and was cited...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021990

    Original file (20100021990.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for his qualifying period of honorable service from 28 May 1965 to 27 May 1968. The evidence of record in this case confirms that although the applicant served in duty MOS 11B during his RVN tour, he never held an infantry MOS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021594

    Original file (20090021594.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 1 October 1971 to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and campaign participation credit for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from May to December 1970. Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns while serving in the RVN. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013110

    Original file (20090013110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by showing his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B (Infantryman) in item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) and adding the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) to the awards entered in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018662

    Original file (20140018662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states, in effect, that the Board should not have denied his previous request on the basis that his unit did not have the word "infantry" in its title or that he failed to provide evidence that he was in direct combat with the enemy while in Vietnam. f. The 765th Security Platoon was the only such unit in Vietnam. He has not provided evidence showing that this Soldier was awarded the CIB for his service with the platoon.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023235

    Original file (20110023235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states that in order to qualify for the Combat Infantryman Badge a member must meet the following three requirements: be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participate in such ground combat. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104577C070208

    Original file (2004104577C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that during his RVN tour, the applicant served as an infantryman/dog handler in a qualifying infantry unit and was present with and personally participated with the unit while it was engaged in active ground combat. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 15 July 1969 through 7 December 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012023

    Original file (20120012023.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.