Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017503
Original file (20090017503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  20 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017503 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the date he entered on active duty as 18 August 1971 or 30 October 1971.

2.  The applicant states the claimant authorization form he received from the Social Security Administration (SSA) shows the date he entered active duty as 18 August 1971 and the letter he received from the Veterans Administration (VA) shows his date of entry on active duty as 30 October 1971.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214, dated 2 April 1976
* SSA claimant authorization form, dated 1 February 2008
* VA letter, undated

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement – Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 October 1975 for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1.

3.  He completed training as a track vehicle mechanic and he was advanced to the pay grade of E-2 on 29 February 1976.

4.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 2 April 1976.  The DD Form 214 shows:

* the date he entered active duty as 30 October 1975
* he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-39, under the Trainee Discharge Program
* he completed 5 months and 3 days of total active service
* he had no prior active service
* he had no prior inactive service

5.  A review of the applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) reveals only the service reflected on his DD Form 214.  It contains no evidence of prior service.

6.  He submits a Claimant Authorization form from the SSA, dated 1 February 2008, which shows his dates of service in the Army were from 18 August 1971 through 2 April 1976.

7.  The undated letter that he submits from the VA shows his dates of service in the Army were from 30 October 1971 through 2 April 1976.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  The DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual's service as it exists on the date of release from active duty or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 properly reflects the date he entered active duty as 30 October 1975.

2.  How the SSA and the VA determined the date of his entry on active duty is unknown.  However, his DD Form 4 shows he enlisted in the Army on 30 October 1975 and his OMPF contains no evidence of prior service.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017503



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017503



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004236

    Original file (20130004236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. However, his record contains a DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 7 July 1976 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13-5 for misconduct. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008365

    Original file (20090008365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). All documents and orders in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), which include a DA Form 1999 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 30 September 1975; Department of the Army, United States Army Military Personnel Center, Letter Orders Number D 11-351(disability retirement orders), dated 25 November 1975; and the DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 10 December 1975, all list...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015621

    Original file (20140015621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 March 1976 to show he was retired in the rank/grade of Chief Warrant Officer Three (CW3)/W-3. It provided a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The DD Form 214 provides a record of a Soldier's active Army service at the time of release from active duty and does not reflect other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016573

    Original file (20090016573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records contain another copy of his DD Form 4 prepared for his 1 November 1972 enlistment that has a pen and ink correction to his SSN, correcting it to the SSN he now claims is correct. The record also contains a DD Form 214, dated 2 April 1976, listing the SSN he now claims is correct in item 3; however, this document is unsigned by the applicant and/or by an authorized official. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090016573 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005974C070205

    Original file (20060005974C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his retirement DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 August 1975 to show the Meritorious Service Medal. However, the applicant provided an award certificate, dated 9 January 1976, for the Meritorious Service Medal for outstanding meritorious service during the period February 1955 to August 1975. Based on the foregoing, the award certificate for the Meritorious Service Medal is accepted as sufficient evidence on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062721C070421

    Original file (2001062721C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be granted entitlement to annuity benefits from the Reserve Component-Survivor Benefit Program (RC-SBP) based upon her deceased husband’s, the former service member (FSM), years of service in the Army National Guard (ARNG) and Army Reserve (USAR). A subsequent Chronological Record of Military Service (ARPC Form 249-3), dated 29 July 1994, indicates only one qualifying year between the retirement year ending (RYE) 30 June 1958 and the 12 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021413

    Original file (20140021413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the TXARNG on 17 April 1971 for 6 years. c. An ARPC Form 606-E, dated 21 March 1995, showing no retirement points for the years 1975 through 1977. d. A DA Form 3918-R, dated July 1996, in which a MOC was provided five pages of unidentified documents pertaining to the applicant from the ARPC. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the TXARNG on 17 April 1971, for 6 years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016339

    Original file (20140016339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argues that he did not discover the error until 1987 when he discussed the allotments with his father and was told that none of them had ever been received. He acknowledges that his father received a letter, dated 21 October 1988, from the U.S. Army Finance and Accounting Center (USAFAC) stating it had been determined that none of the checks had been cashed and had been replaced. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007300

    Original file (20080007300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 4, dated 3 July 1974 shows the applicant’s SSN as xxx-xx-xx92. On the various documents completed by the applicant at the time of his initial entry onto active duty, he listed his SSN as xxx-xx-xx92. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023909

    Original file (20110023909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. The following documents in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) show his SSN as shown on his DD Form 4 and the Form SSA-2458: * a completed DD Form 1584 (National...