IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 04 May 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090017294
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to an honorable or general under honorable conditions discharge.
2. The applicant states he served his country at a time when no one else wanted to serve and would have gladly sacrificed his life for his country. The time he spent on active duty was a rough time in his life. Now his BCD is keeping him from being all he can be.
3. The applicant does not provide any additional documents.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 September 2005 with prior active and inactive service.
2. On 29 June 2006 the applicant was found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, for
* wrongfully possessing some quantity of cocaine while receiving special pay under Title 37, U.S. Code, section 310
* between on or about 20 and 26 February 2006, wrongfully using cocaine while receiving special pay under Title 37, U.S. Code, section 310
* between on or about 25 and 26 February 2006, wrongfully possessing some quantity of marijuana while receiving special pay under Title 37, U.S. Code, section 310
* violating a general order by wrongfully consuming alcohol
* wrongfully using marijuana while receiving special pay under Title 37, U.S. Code, section 310
3. On 28 February 2007, the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals corrected the court-martial order.
4. On 20 July 2007, the applicant's court-martial order being affirmed, his BCD was ordered to be executed.
5. Accordingly, on 7 September 2007, the applicant was discharged with a characterization of service of "Bad Conduct."
6. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
7. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was sentenced to a BCD after being found guilty of five offenses. This is serious misconduct and warranted a BCD.
2. The applicant's love for his country and his desire to be all he can be are commendable. However, these reasons do not form the basis to upgrade a properly issued discharge.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to upgrade his BCD.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ____X__ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090017294
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090017294
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015272
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014067
The applicant states, in effect, that he went to Korea at a very young age and completed 4 years of service. The applicant has provided no evidence to show that his discharge was unjust at the time of his offenses. His post service conduct is not sufficient as a basis to upgrade his bad conduct discharge, particularly in view of his misconduct and offenses.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012818
Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2008/08/11 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and the attached documents submitted by the Applicant. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-06-03239
The discharge case was reviewed by the base legal office and found to be legally sufficient to support discharge and recommended his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court- martial be approved and he be discharged with an UOTHC discharge without probation and rehabilitation (P&R). The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting a change to his UOTHC discharge. Exhibit B.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000495
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 September 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used cocaine between (050108-050118), was found in wrongful possession of marijuana on (070507) and disobeyed a lawful general regulation by wrongfully possessing a marijuana pipe, with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018639
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018639 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Finding: Guilty * On or between 23 May and 1 June 1992, wrongfully using cocaine Plea: Guilty. The applicant could have self-referred at any time.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014311
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600284
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19941021 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial. In response to the Applicant’s issues, with respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008054
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 11 January 2010.
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401408
” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...