Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017291
Original file (20090017291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090017291 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be updated to show his award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and that he be awarded the Cold War Medal.

2.  The applicant states that his unit in Vietnam was awarded the PUC in April 2001 and he desires it to be added to his records.  He further states that he was issued a Cold War Certificate and desires to be awarded the Cold War Medal.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), copies of pages from a book which include a copy of the PUC, a copy of orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal and a copy of orders assigning him to Headquarters, Military Assistance Command Vietnam with duty at Studies and Observation Group (SOG). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 June 1959 and served through a series of continuous reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-8 on 13 April 1980 and was retired on 30 June 1986 and was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 July 1986.  He had served 27 years and 5 days of total active service.

3.  A review of the applicant's official records shows that he served two tours in Vietnam, from 21 May 1968 to 28 May 1969 and 28 January 1971 to 27 January 1972.  He was assigned to Headquarters, Military Assistance Command Vietnam with duty at Studies and Observation Group (SOG) effective 3 February 1971 and remained assigned to that unit until his departure in January 1972.

4.  On 4 April 2001, the PUC was awarded for extraordinary heroism to the Studies and Observation Group (SOG), Military Assistance Command, Vietnam on Department of the Army General Orders Number 25.

5.  The Award of the Cold War Recognition Certificate is not governed by the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) and, as a result, is not shown on a discharge document.  In accordance with section 1084 of the Fiscal Year 1998 National Defense Authorization Act, the Secretary of Defense approved awarding the Cold War Recognition Certificate to all members of the armed forces and qualified federal government civilian personnel who faithfully and honorably served the United States anytime during the Cold War era, which is defined as 2 September 1945 to 26 December 1991.  Some States, via the National Guard, authorize an award of the Cold War Victory Medal or a ribbon; however, to date the Department of Defense has not authorized the issuance of an official medal.  The medal is not authorized for wear on any United States Armed Forces active duty uniform and must be removed from the uniform if called to active duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he is entitled to have the PUC entered on his records has been noted and found to have merit.

2.  He was assigned to SOG, Military Assistance Command, Vietnam and that unit was awarded the PUC.  Accordingly, he is entitled to have that award added to his records.

3.  However, there is no official Cold War Medal and thus the applicant is not entitled to have such an award added to his records.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the PUC to his last DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of a Cold War Medal.  

3.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017291





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090017291



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013110

    Original file (20100013110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests to be awarded the following awards: * Scuba Diver Badge (Renamed as the Special Operations Diver Badge) * Turkish Commando Badge * Military Assistance Command - Vietnam (MACV) Presidential Unit Citation * Cold War Certificate 2. The applicant contends he should be awarded the Special Operations Diver Badge, Turkish Commando Badge, MACV - SOG Presidential Unit Citation, and the Cold War Certificate. Additionally, the Turkish Commando Badge is neither listed as an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002871

    Original file (20090002871.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). He further states that SOG-MACV and its air asset units were awarded the PUC for extraordinary heroism during combat operations behind enemy lines in Laos and Cambodia.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020320

    Original file (20120020320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * DD Form 214 * Letter from the Awards and Decorations Branch, dated 8 March 2012 * DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) * General Orders Number 25, dated 8 June 2001 * Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV)-Studies and Observations Group (SOG) internet information * General Orders Number 729, dated 28 December 1964 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows he completed the SF Officer Course in 1962. Therefore, he completed the required training for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065931C070421

    Original file (2001065931C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant has provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020471

    Original file (20120020471.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A statement by a SGT (medical advisor) states he received a fragment wound on 26 July 1972, the wound was cleansed and dressed, and he was then evacuated to the 67th Evacuation Hospital where an X-ray of the wound revealed a small fragment. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support awarding him the Purple Heart and correcting his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013337

    Original file (20090013337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. General orders awarded the applicant's unit of assignment, the 189th Aviation Company, the Presidential Unit Citation for extraordinary heroism from 29 October 1967 to 30 November 1967...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014566

    Original file (20080014566.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows the applicant received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019860

    Original file (20100019860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * two DD Forms 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * a citation for the Joint Service Commendation Medal * internet documents concerning the Presidential Unit Citation awarded to the Studies and Observation Group (SOG), Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV) * a 19 May 2010 letter from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, MO announcing shipment of the following awards to the applicant: * Joint Service Commendation Medal * National Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017147

    Original file (20130017147.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). Therefore, his record should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 24 January 1975 the: * PUC * MUC * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010699

    Original file (20100010699.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he is entitled to the following awards which are not included on his DD Form 214 or DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) for the service indicated: a. the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal (RVNCAHM) First Class Unit Citation, and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), which are unit awards earned during his service in Vietnam with the 5th Special...