Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016828
Original file (20090016828.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  18 February 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016828 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) be expunged from the restricted section of his official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant essentially states that per Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice), only Soldiers holding the rank of sergeant and above will have a DA Form 2627 filed in the performance or restricted sections of their OMPF.  He also states that he was in the pay grade of E-2 at the time of his Article 15 proceedings and, as such, his Article 15 should not have been filed in either section of his OMPF.  He further contends that Army Regulation 27-10 states that Article 15 proceedings for Soldiers in pay grade E-4 and below will be destroyed after 2 years or upon permanent change of station.

3.  The applicant provides his DA Form 2627 in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently a staff sergeant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) serving on active duty orders until 20 August 2010 for completion of medical care and treatment.  Prior to enlisting in the USAR on 26 September 2006, he served in the Regular Army from 16 July 1986 to 14 July 1989 and subsequently served in the Army National Guard.  The applicant had his last name legally changed from Brown to Bruno in 2002.

2.  The restricted section of the applicant's OMPF contains a DA Form 2627 which shows that he accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15 of the UCMJ on 10 June 1987 for absenting himself without authority from his place of duty on or about 2 June 1987.  Item 5 of this document shows that the commanding officer who imposed the punishment directed that the original of this document be filed in the restricted section of the applicant's OMPF.

3.  Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice) prescribes the policies and procedures pertaining to the administration of military justice.  Paragraph 3-37b of the current version of this regulation, effective 16 December 2005, states that for Soldiers in the ranks of specialist (SPC) or corporal (CPL) and below (prior to punishment), the original DA Form 2627 will be filed locally in unit nonjudicial punishment or unit personnel files.  Such locally filed originals will be destroyed at the end of 2 years from the date of imposition of punishment or on the Soldier's transfer to another general court-martial convening authority (GCMCA).  Paragraph 3-41 also provides that records of nonjudicial punishment previously filed in either the performance or restricted section will remain so filed.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel (MILPER) Information Management/Records), table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) provides, in pertinent part, that for Article 15's issued on or after 25 January 1990, the record of proceedings for Soldiers in the ranks of SPC/CPL or below will be filed only in local nonjudicial punishment files.  The DA Form 2627 will not be filed in the military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) or OMPF of these Soldiers.  Such locally filed originals will be destroyed at the end of 2 years from the date of imposition of punishment or on the Soldier's transfer to another GCMCA.  It also states that for Article 15's issued on or after 1 November 1982, the DA Form 2627 will be filed in the performance or restricted fiche of the OMPF as directed by item 5 of the DA Form 2627.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that a DA Form 2627 should be expunged from the restricted section of his OMPF.

2.  While the regulatory guidance prohibiting the filing of DA Forms 2627 in the MPRJ or OMPF of Soldiers in the ranks of SPC/CPL and below became effective 25 January 1990, the regulatory guidance in effect at the time of the applicant's Article 15 proceedings directed that the DA Form 2627 would be filed as directed by the commanding officer imposing the punishment.  As the applicant's commanding officer directed that his DA Form 2627 be filed in the restricted section of his OMPF, it was properly and appropriately filed in accordance with regulations in effect at the time.  As a result, there is no basis for expunging the applicant's DA Form 2627 from the restricted section of his OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016828



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016828



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002782

    Original file (20150002782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 23 July 1987 from the restricted folder of his official military personnel file (OMPF). c. Army Regulation 27-10, paragraph 3-37(b) (1) directs for Soldiers who are at the rank of specialist (SPC) or corporal (CPL) and below (prior to punishment) the original DA Form 2627 will be filed locally in unit nonjudicial punishment or unit personnel files. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086772C070212

    Original file (2003086772C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records of punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dated 10 December 1986 and 1 April 1987 be removed from the Restricted (R) fiche of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Article 15s were placed on his R fiche as indicated in item 5 of his DA Form 2627 (Record of proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ). The applicant’s record of punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, dated 10 December 1986 and 1 April 1987, were properly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002783

    Original file (20120002783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 5 (filing instructions) of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), regarding filing the Article 15 in the performance or the restricted section of his official military personnel file (OMPF) is lined through and replaced with the entry "N/A" (Not Applicable). NJP may be imposed to correct, educate, and reform offenders who the imposing commander determines cannot benefit from less stringent measures; to preserve a Soldier's record of service from unnecessary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018204

    Original file (20120018204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of an Article 15 from his records. Item 4b (filing instructions) of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), regarding the filing of the Article 15 in the performance or the restricted section of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File, is shown as "N/A" (Not Applicable) since the applicant was an E-4 and below at the start of the proceedings. 4. Review of the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001263

    Original file (20080001263.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627 [Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)], dated 2 March 1981, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Paragraph 3-15c(3a) of regulation in effect at the time, states, in pertinent part, that in cases of persons serving on active duty in an enlisted status and having completed 3 years or less of active Federal military service at the time of the offense alleged, except for originals designated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067603C070402

    Original file (2002067603C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069672C070402

    Original file (2002069672C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that two Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (DA Form 2627) be removed from the restricted fiche (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, the Board concludes, given the minor nature of the offense for which the applicant accepted the NJP, that these current standards should be applied and that it would be appropriate to remove the DA Form 2627, dated 10 April 1987, from his OMPF at this time. However, the evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009382C070206

    Original file (20050009382C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 5 on the applicant's DA Form 2627, dated 21 August 2000, shows that the imposing commander marked an "X" in the performance fiche block (i.e., to file the DA Form 2627 in the performance fiche of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)). Evidence of record shows at the time the non-judicial punishment was imposed against the applicant he held rank of SGT. Army Regulation 27-10 does not allow the original DA Form 2627 on Soldiers SGT and above to be filed in local unit records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078568C070215

    Original file (2002078568C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the Record of Proceedings of nonjudicial punishment imposed under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), on 25 January 1988, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states that, as of 17 January 1990, nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, is no longer filed in the OMPF of pay grades E-4 and below. The applicant’s military records show that he initially served in the U.S. Army Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021275

    Original file (20090021275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of an earlier request that a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) imposed on 21 May 1999 be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). On 8 December 2009, the DASEB informed the applicant that the regulation precluded that board from removing records of nonjudicial punishment from an individual's OMPF and that the authority rested with the ABCMR. c. Paragraph 3-43 of...