Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016800
Original file (20090016800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016800 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he completed a DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Document) and DA Form 3540 (Certificate and Acknowledgment of U.S. Army Reserve Service Requirements and Methods of Fulfillment) reenlisting in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) for an indefinite period of time prior to his expiration term of service of 21 September 2005.

2.  The applicant states he was told he was discharged [from the IRR after 19 years of service] due to an erroneous enlistment in 2005 but he was never notified that his reenlistment was erroneous or that he was being discharged.

3.  The applicant provides an Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps on 27 September 1977 and completed 4 years and 3 days of active service.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 12 May 1983.  He was appointed as a second lieutenant on 26 October 1984 and was promoted to the rank of captain on 25 March 1992.  He was discharged from the Army National Guard as an officer on 22 September 1993 and enlisted in the Army National Guard the following day for 6 years in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.  A National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he was released from the Army National Guard and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Standby), effective 24 May 1996 due to incompatible occupation.  The applicant apparently reenlisted in the USAR for six years with a new ETS date of 21 September 2005.  This document shows his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B (infantryman).

4.  The applicant's records maintained in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) contain a DD Form 4/1 that shows in block 5 (Date of Enlistment/Reenlistment) the entry "050926" [26 September 2005].  His iPERMS also contain a DA Form 3540 that shows, by his signature, he acknowledged and understood his service obligation, methods of fulfillment, and satisfactory participation.  This form was administered and signed by a commissioned officer on 16 September 2005.

5.  The applicant's records in iPERMS currently show his expiration term of service (ETS) date as 21 September 2005.

6.  AHRC-PAP-T Orders D-01-601639, dated 24 January 2006, show the applicant was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve, effective 24 January 2006.

7.  AHRC-PLM-O Orders M-08-601792R, dated 15 September 2006, revoked Orders M-08-601792 pertaining to order to active duty of the applicant.

8.  In the processing of this case, on 3 February 2010, an advisory opinion was obtained from the U.S. Human Resources Command, St. Louis (HRC - STL).  The HRC-STL official stated there were no records to indicate the applicant's discharge was based on a fraudulent enlistment.  The official states that it appeared to be an ETS discharge based on the codes used for generating the discharge order.
9.  Army Regulation 140-111 (USAR Reenlistment Program) states that except as indicated in paragraph 5–15 (antedating reenlistment) the date of reenlistment is the date upon which the oath of enlistment is administered.  The date will be shown on the enlistment record (item 19f, DD Form 4/2).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's records in iPERMS show his ETS as 21 September 2005.  However, it is reasonable to believe that without awareness of the discharge order, the presence of active duty orders generated after the ETS date may lead a person to suppose they still have a military status.

2.  While it appears the date in block 5 of the applicant's DD Form 4/1 shows
26 September 2005, DA Form 3540 (Annex A to the DD Form 4/1) shows the oath was administered on 16 September 2005.  It is not possible to ascertain with certainty the date next to the applicant's signature on this form; however, it appears that it is also intended to show 050916 (16 September 2005).  As such, in the interest of equity and justice it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show a valid reenlistment was completed on 16 September 2005 for an indefinite period with continued service in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR).

3.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to revoke AHRC-PAP-T Orders
D-01-601639, dated 24 January 2006, that discharged him from the USAR.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to have his records corrected as shown below.
 
BOARD VOTE:

___X____  __X_____  __X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending the date shown in block 5 of his DD Form 4/1 to show "20050916," thereby validating the reenlistment, and

	b.  revoking AHRC-PAP-T Orders D-01-601639, dated 24 January 2006.



      ________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016800



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016800



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011713C070208

    Original file (20040011713C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 April 2000, the applicant signed an enlistment contract enlisting in the IRR for 3 years. The applicant completed and signed an enlistment contract dated 10 February 2003 reenlisting in the IRR for 6 years. Army Regulation 140-111 (U. S. Army Reserve Reenlistment Program), paragraph 7-4 states when an IRR Soldier is to be processed for immediate reenlistment, USAHRC – STL will send the Soldier a partially completed DD Form 4-series, a DA Form 3540, and a detailed letter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016340C070206

    Original file (20050016340C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he believes that the effective date of his antedated Enlistment Contract should be 21 February 2005 and not 3 August 2004. The director stated that the applicant's ETS date was 2 August 2004 according to his Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment dated 24 July 2003, and that the memorandum approving the antedated reenlistment directed that the Department of the Army authorized date of 3 August 2004 would be used when preparing the DD Form 4/1. The director indicated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012219

    Original file (20090012219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official stated that, due to the applicant having been transferred to the inactive list on 19 June 2007 and subsequently transferred back to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 15 August 2007, he was not on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) for one continuous year prior to the convening date of the 2007 DA Reserve Components Colonel AMEDD Selection Board. If selected for promotion, his orders to the Retired Reserve should be voided, his promotion effective date and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016121

    Original file (20080016121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired) effective 11 July 1992 and that he be credited with the appropriate retirement points from that date. Counsel requests, in effect, that the applicant be granted retirement points credit for service in the IRR until his retirement. However, the applicant's original request of 16 May 1990 is filed in his official records and it very clearly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007303

    Original file (20080007303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 14 January 2008 be voided and that her record be corrected to show that in February 2007 she elected to be placed in a Reserve unit. Instructions in the applicant's transfer orders informed her that she would be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (if eligible) 1 year from 27 December 2006 unless she provided the MSO form requesting to remain in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). The official...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003662C070205

    Original file (20060003662C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the WAARNG had discharge orders transferring him to the IRR. Yet, their State had discharge orders transferring him to the IRR. The evidence shows the applicant had been given two deferments for attendance of Phase II of the USASMA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015856

    Original file (20080015856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The orders specify that the applicant has an MSO through 17 December 2009 and that an Oath of Office for Reserve appointment would be executed at the time of his discharge. Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges) states, in pertinent part, that an officer who requests resignation before completing the 8-year MSO must agree to accept an indefinite appointment the USAR to complete such service obligation. The orders clearly specify that he had an MSO through 17 December...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020894

    Original file (20090020894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her record to reinstate her in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) so she may maintain eligibility for payment under the Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) Program. The advisory official states there is no record showing the applicant reenlisted in the USAR on or after the date she completed her enlistment. There is no evidence she attempted to reenlist before or after her term of service expired on 9 November 2003 even though it was in her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003865C070205

    Original file (20060003865C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his reenlistment contract be antedated to show that he reenlisted prior to completing 16 years of military service. When the Commander, USA HRC has authorized a reenlistment to be antedated, the DA-authorized date will be entered in Items 5 of DD Form 4/1, and 13c and 14f of DD Form 4/2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by filing in the applicant's Official Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016707

    Original file (20130016707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant request, in effect, retention of his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR); correction to his leave; and correction to his insurance coverage. The applicant's SLRP records indicate he enlisted in the USAR 17 April 1999 and was authorized to receive $10,000 toward the SLRP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * revoking Order Number 02-074-012, dated...