Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016768
Original file (20090016768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  04 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016768 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he received the Purple Heart in early 1971 in Vietnam and it is not shown on his DD Form 214.  He contends that it was an error.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 December 1969 for a period of 3 years.  He served as an infantryman and clerk typist in Vietnam from 
4 December 1970 to 3 December 1971.  On 31 March 1972, he was discharged under honorable conditions (a general discharge).  On 27 November 1979, the applicant's discharge was upgraded to honorable as a result of the order of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Giles v. Secretary of the Army.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.   

4.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

6.  On 10 February 1972, the applicant underwent a separation physical examination which makes no mention of any injuries or wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _X   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016768





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016768



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016156

    Original file (20130016156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for a concussion injury caused by an enemy-generated explosion in the Republic of Vietnam. His service medical records were not available for review. According to the Report of Medical Examination and Report of Medical History provided by the applicant, he had a tympanic membrane graft (right ear) due to a perforated tympanic membrane in April 1965 and December 1971 at Fort Hood, TX, and Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015555

    Original file (20130015555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the available records and he provides no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008507

    Original file (20080008507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart, due to an injury he sustained to his chest was considered. While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not questioned, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004330

    Original file (20090004330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which shows he was wounded in action during his tour in Vietnam. However, there is no evidence of record which shows he sustained a wound as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028054

    Original file (20100028054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show award of a second Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device and a Purple Heart. The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any documentation to corroborate the statement from his relative that he received a wound, as a result of hostile action, that required treatment by medical personnel or that any medical treatment for such a wound was made a matter of official record. The applicant has provided insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012275

    Original file (20100012275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was wounded when his unit came under attack while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available record showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011987

    Original file (20110011987.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he should have been awarded the Purple Heart because he sustained a shrapnel wound to his right hand. There is no evidence in the available record showing he was awarded the Purple Heart. Based on the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000944

    Original file (20100000944.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no medical records in the applicant's file associated with treatment for wounds on either 3 or 14 May 1971. Although the applicant's records contain orders for two awards of the Purple Heart, it appears the applicant may have only been wounded once, on 3 May 1971 as evidenced by the Western Union Telegram, the entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, and the fact the applicant asked that his records be corrected to reflect only one award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011840

    Original file (20110011840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the periods16 August 1965 through 18 July 1966 and 20 October 1971 through 27 January 1972. The applicant's request that his record be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart was carefully considered. Accordingly, based on the foregoing there is insufficient evidence to award him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013833

    Original file (20130013833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds/injuries, and his treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple...