Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016751
Original file (20090016751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  02 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016751 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his separation code and Reentry (RE) Code be changed to more favorable codes that will allow him to reenter the service and obtain benefits. 

2.  The applicant states that his separation document indicates he did not complete his first full term of service.  However, he initially enlisted for a period of 3 years and subsequently reenlisted for a period of 4 years.  He goes on to state that he feels betrayed by the Army because he was cleared of all charges and neither his rank nor funds were restored to him so he requested to be discharged.  He continues by stating that his battalion commander gave him a general discharge because he did not complete his reenlistment.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 June 1998 for a period of 3 years and training as a cavalry scout.  He completed one-station unit training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and was transferred to Korea on 24 October 1998 for assignment to an infantry company.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 23 May 1999.

3.  He departed Korea on 19 October 1999 and was transferred to Fort Knox for assignment to a cavalry troop.

4.  On 20 June 2000, he reenlisted for a period of 4 years and a selective reenlistment bonus.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 17 August 2000.

5.  On 13 February 2001, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant for fleeing apprehension by the military police, making a false official statement, and wrongfully consuming alcohol while under the age of 21.

6.  On 3 March 2001, NJP was imposed against him for the wrongful use of marijuana.

7.  On 11 May 2001, he was convicted by a special court-martial of being absent without leave terminated by apprehension.  He was sentenced to confinement for 60 days and a forfeiture of pay.

8.  On 13 June 2001, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, paragraph 14-12b due to a pattern of misconduct.  He cited the applicant’s disciplinary record and his failure to respond to repeated counseling for failure to go to his place of duty as the basis for his recommendation. 

9.  After consulting with counsel, the applicant waived his rights and elected not to submit a statement in his behalf.

10.  The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 3 July 2001 and directed that he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate.

11.  Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 11 July 2001, under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, due to a pattern of misconduct.  He was issued a separation code of “JKA” to denote the separation authority (AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b) and an RE Code of “3.”  He had served 2 years, 10 months, and 28 days of total active service and had 56 days of lost time.  The entry “Member has not completed first full term of service” was entered in the remarks section (block 18) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).  

12.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment processing into the Regular Army and the USAR.  Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

13.  RE-3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable.  Certain persons who have received nonjudicial punishment are so disqualified, as are persons with bars to reenlistment, and those discharged under the provisions of chapters 5, 9, 10, 13, 14, and 16 of Army Regulation 635-200.  A waiting period of 2 years from separation is required before a waiver may be submitted through a local recruiting office.

14.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the 
DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that routinely, a Soldier should not be considered to have completed the first full term of active service if separation occurs before the end of the initial contracted period of service.  However, if a Soldier reenlists before the completion of that period of service, the first term of service is effectively redefined by virtue of the reenlistment contract.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights.
 
2.  The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation        635-200, chapter 14; therefore, he was properly issued a separation code of “JKA” and an RE code of RE-3 in accordance with the applicable regulations.

3.  However, the applicant’s initial term of enlistment was redefined when he reenlisted and therefore his DD Form 214 should reflect that he completed his first full term of service.


4.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that he was issued the wrong separation and or RE codes at the time of his discharge.  Even though his request to change his Separation and RE codes is being denied, this does not preclude him from working with local recruiting personnel on ascertaining his eligibility for continued military service.  Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for determining whether an individual meets the current enlistment criteria and to process a request for a waiver if appropriate.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 to show that he completed his first full term of service. 

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing his Separation and RE codes.  



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016751





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016751



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020977

    Original file (20090020977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 December 2002 to show: * completion of first full term of service * rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private (PV1)/E-1 * reentry eligibility (RE) code of 1 instead RE code 3 2. There is no evidence in the applicant's record that shows he was advanced to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 during his period of service. The applicant contends that his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022009

    Original file (20120022009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b; therefore, he was properly assigned the SPD code of JKA and corresponding RE code of "3" in accordance with the applicable regulations. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007061

    Original file (20080007061.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code “JKA” is “Misconduct” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b. Pertinent Army regulations...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150000454

    Original file (AR20150000454.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates on 7 January 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving two Field Grade Article's 15, one vacation of suspension, and multiple negative counseling statements. On 22 January 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008146

    Original file (20110008146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b with a separation code of "JKA," reentry code of "3," and a narrative reason for separation of a pattern of misconduct. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006004

    Original file (AR20090006004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 24 July 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021405

    Original file (20110021405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was not married at the time of his discharge and was issued a RE Code of “3.” 3. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, and given an SPD code of “JKA”; therefore, he was properly assigned an RE code of RE-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018809

    Original file (20130018809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 August 2012, his commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b for a pattern of misconduct. The commander advised the applicant of his right to: * consult with consulting counsel and/or civilian counsel at no expense to the Government * a hearing before an administrative board * personal appearance before an administrative separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007995

    Original file (20120007995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation states the reason for discharge based on SPD code "JKA" is "Pattern of Misconduct" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b. He was 22 years of age when he enlisted and successfully completed training. There is no evidence that indicates he was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed their military terms of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014984

    Original file (20080014984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed his first term of service. At the time of his discharge, he had completed 2 years and 8 days of his enlistment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "MEMBER HAS NOT COMPLETED FIRST FULL TERM OF SERVICE" from item 18 of his DD Form 214; and b. adding the entry...