Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016622
Original file (20090016622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
		BOARD DATE:	  4 May 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016622 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be considered for captain (CPT) by a special selection board (SSB).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2 while on active duty.  He transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 13 August 2004.  While in the USAR, his records were never considered for promotion to CPT.  

3.  The applicant provides XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg Orders 189-0368, dated 7 July 2004; a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 13 August 2004, and National Guard Bureau (NGB) Federal Recognition Orders Number 8 AR, dated 9 January 2009.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant had prior enlisted service in the Iowa Army National Guard (IAARNG).  On 12 May 2001, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army in the rank of second lieutenant (2LT)/O-1.

2.  The applicant entered active duty on 14 August 2001 and was promoted to the rank of 1LT on 14 February 2003.



3.  On 13 August 2004, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the USAR.

4.  There is no evidence in the applicant's records that shows he was considered for promotion by the Department of the Army (DA) Reserve Component Captain Promotion Selection Board.  

5.  NGB Federal Recognition Orders Number 8 AR, dated 9 January 2009 show he was appointed as a 1LT in the IAARNG effective 23 October 2008.

6.  In the processing of this case, a memorandum was obtained from the Chief, Special Actions Branch U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, dated 24 February 2010.  The Chief, Special Actions Branch, recommended that the applicant be considered by an SSB under the 2006 through 2009 CPT criteria.  The official stated that based on the applicant's date of rank (DOR) of 
14 February 2003, he was in the zone for promotion consideration by the 2006 through 2009 DA Reserve Components CPT Selection Boards.  His file was inadvertently omitted from the boards; therefore, it is recommended that he be granted promotion consideration by DA SSB's under the 2006 through 2009 criteria.  The applicant concurred with the advisory opinion.

7.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other than General Officers) states, in pertinent part, that an SSB will convene to correct/prevent an injustice to an officer or former officer who was eligible for promotion but whose records through error, were not submitted or omitted to a mandatory promotion selection board for consideration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant was eligible for promotion consideration but his records were inadvertently omitted from consideration by the 2006 through 2009 DA Reserve Components CPT Selection Boards through no fault of the applicant.  

2.  Therefore, based on the foregoing, it would be in the interest of justice to grant the applicant promotion consideration to CPT by sending his records to an SSB for consideration under the 2006 through 2009 CPT criteria.






BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  ___x_____  __x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  submitting his records to the next available SSB for consideration for promotion to CPT under the 2006 or later, if necessary, criteria;  
     
   b.  if he is selected for promotion by the SSB, his records should be corrected by establishing his CPT promotion effective date and date of rank as if he had been originally selected under the earlier criteria identified by the SSB and providing him all back pay and allowances due as a result; and 

   c.  if he is not selected for promotion by the SSB, he should be so notified by U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis promotion officials.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016622



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016622



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017487

    Original file (20080017487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states the record shows the applicant was considered and selected for promotion to CPT by the 1997 RCSB and was given a date of rank of 3 October 1998 as a TPU officer. Therefore, as recommended by HRC promotion officials, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to refer the applicant's record to an SSB for consideration for promotion to CPT under the criteria of the 1994 (if otherwise eligible, given his 1 November 1994 REFRAD date) and 1995 promotion boards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011090

    Original file (20090011090.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, while there is no basis upon which to authorize an adjustment of the applicantÂ’s DOR at this time, the evidence of record confirms the applicant was erroneously omitted from promotion consideration by the FY 1994, 1995, and 1996 RCSBs, as confirmed in the HRC-St. Louis advisory opinion. If the SSB selects the applicant for promotion to CPT under an earlier criteria, her CPT promotion effective date and DOR should be adjusted accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020913

    Original file (20100020913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) corrected his record in 2005 to adjust his date of rank (DOR) for captain (CPT)/O-3, but this correction was not completed in time for him to submit a request for consideration by a special selection board (SSB) to put him back in line with his original year group. The evidence shows after correction of his DOR for CPT the applicant was in the zone of consideration for promotion to MAJ under the 2005 RCSB criteria. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013317

    Original file (20090013317.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to captain (CPT) be adjusted by 2 years based on the Corrected Copy of an Appointment Memorandum, dated 13 February 2006. The opinion indicated the applicant was considered and selected for promotion to CPT by the 2006 DA Reserve Components Selection Board. The advisory opinion stated that the applicant was in the zone for consideration for earlier promotion boards since his DOR to 1LT was adjusted to 12 July 2000 and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010152

    Original file (20140010152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 August 2004, the CAARNG published State Orders 233-1101 appointing him in the ARNG in the rank of CPT as an SP officer, effective 18 August 2004. Discussion: [Applicant] believes he should have received a promotion date effective 2 February 2009 because of the 4-year delay in correcting and processing his DA Form 5074-1-R for creditable service in a required grade. As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020328

    Original file (20100020328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 July 2003, the ABCMR granted him relief and directed correction of his records to show he was promoted to 1LT with an effective date and DOR of 31 March 1999 (2 years from his DOR as a 2LT). On 11 March 2009, by memorandum, an official at the Department of the Army (DA) Promotions, HRC-STL recommended disapproval of the applicant's request for promotion to CPT with a 2001 DOR and promotion to MAJ with a 2004 DOR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007686

    Original file (20090007686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) as captain (CPT) from 11 June 2006 to 14 February 2005. After providing a historical background of the applicant's military service and his recent application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, the Chief, Personnel Division, stated that the applicant was separated from the ARNG and transferred to the USAR effective 10 June 2006. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was considered by a DA SSB that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024926

    Original file (20100024926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders C-09-521084, issued by HRC on 21 September 2005, releasing her from the USAR Control Group and reassigning her to the 77th RRC, Fort Totten, NY, effective 21 September 2005. b. DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record), dated 1 April 2011, showing the applicant was assigned to HHC, 77th RRC on 22 September 2005, in paragraph/line number 019/02, position title executive officer, and an authorized grade of O-3. The effective date of promotion and DOR will be the same as if the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011631

    Original file (20100011631.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests consideration before a special selection board (SSB) because an officer evaluation report (OER) was not completed and filed in his official military personnel file (OMPF). When HRC, Office of Promotions determines a board file contains a material error such as one or more missing evaluation reports that should have been seen by the promotion board, was missing from the officer's OMPF, then an officer's promotion file will be referred to an SSB. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021461

    Original file (20130021461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * unfavorable information was placed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) in 1993 without his knowledge * he discovered the unfavorable information in his AMHRR in the summer of 2010 * in November 2010, he petitioned the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) * the DASEB immediately removed the unfavorable information and granted him SSB promotion consideration for the 2009 Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Selection Board * he was...