Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016589
Original file (20090016589.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  23 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016589 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal and all other awards he may be entitled to.

2.  The applicant states he was put in for the Bronze Star Medal in November 1967 and it should be shown on his DD Form 214 along with any other awards he may have earned.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, Unite States Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in pay grade E-1 on 7 September 1965, for 3 years.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  He served in Vietnam from 13 February 1966 to 8 February 1967. He was assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion (Mechanized), 5th Infantry.

3.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty in pay grade E-5 on 6 September 1968 and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following awards:  Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Launcher (M-79) Bar, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun (M-60) Bar, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Recoilless Rifle (90 mm) Bar, Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, National Defense Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  The Bronze Star Medal is not listed as an authorized award.

5.  The applicant's record shows that he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his tenure of service.  There is no evidence the applicant was found disqualified for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the Bronze Star Medal among his authorized awards.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) records of the applicant's units for the timeframe the applicant served in Vietnam was conducted.  This review failed to show that any orders were published awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that at the time of his assignment, his unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award for service from January to April 1966 based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 2, dated 1967; Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service from January 1966 to August 1968, based on DAGO Number 5, dated 1973; and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for service from 1 January 1966 to 21 January 1970, based on DAGO Number 51, dated 1971.

10.  U.S. Army Republic of Vietnam Regulation Number 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  This regulation stated that the Bronze Star Medal could be awarded for heroism, meritorious achievement or service which did not involve aerial flight, but which was performed in connection with military operations against an armed enemy including combat, support, and supply operations.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130 provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion.  It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.

12.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to the Secretary of the Army at the following agency:  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Personnel Service Support Division, 200 Stovall Street, Room 3S67, Alexandria, VA  22332-0405.  The applicant's unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the award being recommended.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests for consideration of awards should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  
Corroborating evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the circumstances and events relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling documentation to support approval of requested awards and decorations rest with the requestor.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service in the Army.  There is also no evidence of indiscipline during his service.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 7 September 1965 to 6 September 1968 and correction of his records to show this award.

2.  General orders entitled the applicant's unit to award of the Valorous Unit Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards.

3.  The applicant's contention that he was put in for the Bronze Star Medal in November 1967 is acknowledged; however, he has provided no orders showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.  Also, there was no evidence found either in his service personnel record or in the ADCARS data base to support the addition of this award to his DD Form 214.

4.  While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for the Bronze Star Medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130.

5.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x____  ___x_____  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ____ ____  ________  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for his honorable service from 7 September 1965 to 6 September 1968;

   b.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award), Valorous Unit Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation; and

   c.  providing him a corrected DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction to his DD Form 214 to show award of the Bronze Star Medal.



      ___________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016589



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016589



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021288

    Original file (20130021288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: * completed the Recruiter Career Counselor Course * spent 6 overseas service tours and may be entitled to 5 Overseas Service Ribbons * served in Korea for 13 months and should be entitled to the Korean Service Medal and/or Korea Defense Service Medal * he was assigned as a Drill Sergeant and should be entitled to the Drill Sergeant Identification Badge * in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the: * Army of Occupation Medal (Berlin) *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027957

    Original file (20100027957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows the Meritorious Unit Commendation was awarded to the 539th Transportation Company for these periods: * from 1 November 1967 to 31 October 1968 by DAGO Number 39, dated 1970 * from 1 November 1968 to 31 January 1970 by DAGO Number 51, dated 1971 c. This same publication shows the 539th Transportation Company received the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 1 January to 31 December 1971 by DAGO Number 32, dated 1973. d....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007351

    Original file (20090007351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090007351 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his Purple Heart and all other awards to which he is entitled be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that the applicant's units were awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000911

    Original file (20140000911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 22 September 1966 to on or about 21 September 1967 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he received all "excellent" ratings for conduct and efficiency and, during his period of service in the Republic of Vietnam, he was assigned to: * Company A, 3d Battalion, 22d...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020701

    Original file (20100020701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. The following awards should also be added to the applicant's DD Form 214: * Presidential Unit Citation * Valorous Unit Award * Meritorious Unit Commendation * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Pistol Bars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (Second...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002571

    Original file (20110002571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service star * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge 8. There is no available order or other available evidence showing the applicant was awarded the 1st award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001859

    Original file (20110001859.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) her late husband's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * two or three bronze service stars to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003621

    Original file (20120003621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request the applicant provides the following documents: a. a letter from the applicant to a VFW MSO, undated, in which he states he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, but he never received his other awards, including the: * Purple Heart (3 awards) * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (2 awards) * Presidential Unit Citation * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun (M-60) Bar * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013339

    Original file (20090013339.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Good Conduct Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Air Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar, and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017001

    Original file (20110017001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. The applicant served in Vietnam during a qualifying period; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 8 February 1966 through 17...