Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016194
Original file (20090016194.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  13 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090016194 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his date of birth as 2 July 1946 (hereafter referred to as birth month July instead of June).  He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 February 1973 to show 2 years of foreign service in Vietnam as he also served in Vietnam in 1968 - 1969.

2.  The applicant states he served two years in Vietnam, not one year.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his birth certificate and his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 February 1973.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 12 May 1967.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of light weapons infantryman.  He reenlisted for 4 years on 22 February 1969.  His applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 February 1969 shows 1 year of foreign service (for Vietnam) in item 22c.  The highest grade he held was pay grade E-5.

3.  The applicant's birth certificate and DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) both show his birth month as July.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States) for his 22 February 1969 reenlistment shows his birth month as June.  Both his DD Forms 214 show his birth month as June.

5.  On 21 February 1973, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Standby) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows his birth month as June.  This document shows he completed a total 5 years, 9 months, and 10 days of active military service.  Item 30 (Remarks) of this document contains the entry, "Vietnam - 28 Feb 71 thru 25 Jan 72; Indochina - Yes; Korea - No."  Item 30 also contains a handwritten entry, "Also in Vietnam 68-69."

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty and provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The purpose of a separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his/her military service.  It is a vital record for interested government agencies which assist the veteran in obtaining the rights and benefits to which he/she is entitled.  Therefore, it is important that information entered is complete and accurate.  It also establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It prescribes entry of the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's birth certificate and DD Form 47 show his birth month as July.  As such, it appears the birth month on the applicant's DD Form 4 and both of his DD Forms 214 was transcribed in error; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct these three documents to show his birth month as July.

2.  Any service the applicant had in Vietnam during the 1968-1969 time frame would be shown on the applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 February 1969, which shows 1 year of foreign service in item 22c for that period of active duty.  As such, since a DD Form 214 should only show foreign service for a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty, any prior service in Vietnam would not be shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 February 1973.

3.  The evidence indicates the applicant's foreign service is properly shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 February 1973.  Therefore, there is insufficient basis to change this entry.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to have his records corrected as shown below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ___X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the birth month to show July on his DD Form 4 and both of his DD Forms 214.



2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 February 1973 to show 2 years of service in Vietnam.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016194



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090016194



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000134

    Original file (20150000134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While in Germany, he was honorably discharged on 1 November 1967 for the purpose of immediate enlistment in the Regular Army. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. He served a qualifying period for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and his DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 May 1969 should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011067

    Original file (20090011067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 January 1973 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 11d (Effective Date) shows the entry "26 Aug 69"; c. Item 22 (Statement of Service) shows the following entries: (1) Item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period) shows "3 1 0"; (2) Item 22a(2) (Other Service) shows "0 6 15"; (3) Item 22a(3) (Total) shows "3 7 15"; (4) Item 22b...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019802

    Original file (20110019802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 4 December 1973 by: a. showing his foreign service in Vietnam; b. showing his actual date of entry on military service (currently shows 5 December 1973 [sic – shows 1969]); and c. adding the Vietnam Service Medal or Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant initially enlisted in the RA on 25 October 1967, he served 11...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014921

    Original file (20070014921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his date of birth as 20 September 1947; to show award of the “Iron Curtain Medal” (correctly known as the Cold War Recognition Certificate), the Driver Badge, and the Purple Heart; to show he served 3 years in Stuttgart, Germany, 9 months in Berlin, Germany, and 4 months in Vietnam for a total of 4 years and 1 month of foreign service; and in effect, that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004907

    Original file (20120004907.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. his date of birth (DOB) as 21 June 1940; b. his date of entry on active duty as 29 April 1968; c. his foreign service as 6 months and 21 days in Vietnam; and d. his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Since his DD Form 220 shows he entered active duty on 29 April 1968, and his DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty on 12 December 1969 after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020581

    Original file (20100020581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 6 (DOB) 29 May 1949 * item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in: * Germany from 18 February through 23 July 1970 (5 months and 6 days) * Vietnam from 9 September 1970 through 13 August 1971 (11 months and 5 days) * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with: * the 512th Transportation Company from 19 to 23 September 1970 * the 545th Transportation Company from 24 September 1970 to 20 June 1971 * the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063663C070421

    Original file (2001063663C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 for this period of service is not present in his records. The applicant’s DD Form 214 covering his service from 12 September 1970 to 18 January 1973 is present in his records. The Board also noted that the dates of the applicant’s foreign service in Vietnam were shown on the DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 3 November 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013625

    Original file (20100013625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he completed 3 months and 6 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He was inducted on 10 February 1970 and was honorably discharged on 18 November 1970. Therefore, he completed 9 months and 2 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He enlisted on 19 November 1970 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025108

    Original file (20100025108.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 10 months and 3 days of foreign service in the USARPAC (Vietnam) from 19 November 1970 to 21 September 1971 which is not reflected on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017100

    Original file (20130017100.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Later regulations required the inclusive dates of service in Vietnam; therefore, it would be appropriate to show his service in Vietnam in Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 January 1969. The applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and he served in Vietnam during five campaigns; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 January 1969 to show this award with one silver service star. As a result, the Board recommends...