IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 March 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015919
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
2. The applicant states, in effect, he received the AGCM and is eligible for the NDSM. He further states he is eligible for the VSM based on completing 60 days of temporary duty (TDY) in Thailand from December 1963 to February 1964.
3. The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 April 1961 and upon completion of initial entry training was awarded military occupational specialty 293.10 (Field Radio Relay and Carrier Operator).
3. item 29 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) contain entries confirming he served in the United States Army Europe (Germany) from 22 August 1961 to 14 March 1964. Neither record documents service in Thailand.
4. Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicant's
DA Form 24 shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments, and his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any derogatory information or a unit commander disqualification that would have precluded him from receiving the AGCM.
5. The applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of specialist four, on 23 March 1964, after completing 2 years, 11 months, and
21 days of active duty with no time lost. Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows that during his active duty he earned the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. Paragraph 2-10 contains guidance on the NDSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded for honorable active service for any period between
27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.
7. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment or assignment to an organization participating in or directly supporting operations in Vietnam for 1 or more days. Member serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award direct support of operations in Vietnam qualified for the award.
8. Chapter 4 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the AGCM. It states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years, except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service, in which case a period of more than 1 year is a qualifying period. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that AGCM should be added to his DD Form 214 was carefully considered and found to have merit. Although there are no orders or record entries indicating he was awarded the AGCM during his active duty tenure, the evidence of record does confirm he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. Further, there is no derogatory information or a unit commander disqualification on file that would have precluded him from receiving the AGCM.
2. In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 3 April 1961 through 23 March 1964 and to add this award to his DD Form 214 at this time.
3. The evidence of record also shows that based on his active duty during a qualifying period, the applicant is eligible for the NDSM. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add this award to his DD Form 214.
4. The applicant's contention that he is eligible for the VSM based on TDY service in Thailand was also carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.
5. The evidence of record fails to corroborate the applicant's claim that he served in Thailand. Further, even had he served in Thailand, it would be necessary to verify that his TDY service in that country was in direct support of operations in Vietnam, which the evidence of record and independent evidence submitted by the applicant fails to do. More importantly, the eligibility period for award of the VSM began on 3 July 1965. The applicant separated in March 1964. As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting this portion of the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
____x____ ____x____ ____x____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 3 April 1961 through 23 March 1964 and adding this award to his DD Form 214;
b. adding the National Defense Service Medal to his DD Form 214; and
c. providing him a correction to his DD Form 214 that includes these awards.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Vietnam Service Medal.
_______ _ __x_____ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090015919
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090015919
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026328
Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award. Based on a qualifying period of service and his assignment to a unit which provided direct support for the Vietnam War, he is entitled to award of the AFEM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001164
Section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations) of the applicant's DA Form 24 does not show award of the AFEM for Cuba, NDSM, AFEM for Vietnam, VSM, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Gallantry Cross, or Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Unit Citation. While the applicant asserts he may be entitled to award of the VSM, there is no evidence that the applicant served on active duty during the time this medal was authorized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021547
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) 2. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to U.S. Army Strategic Communications Command Facility in Vietnam from 15 October 1965 to 25 June 1966 (total...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017075
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) based on his service in Thailand. By regulation, the VSM and RVNCM are authorized for members who served in Thailand in units providing direct support to Republic of Vietnam (RVN) operations. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he is eligible for the VSM and RVNCM with Device (1960) based on his service in Thailand;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001074
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Vietnam Expeditionary Medal [correctly known as the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM)] for Thailand, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and any other medals or awards he may be authorized. The evidence of record shows that based on his active duty during a qualifying period, the applicant is eligible for the NDSM. There is no evidence, nor did the applicant provide any evidence, that shows the 44th...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 03206
His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and Thailand. The VSM is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 1965 and 28 Mar 1973, in the area of eligibility. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2010- 03206 in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02514
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) be added to his records and he be issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and any other awards related to service in Vietnam. Based on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028945
Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, authorized the award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all personnel assigned to the RVN from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973. The evidence of record confirms the applicant did not complete the minimum 6 months service in the RVN as required by regulation for award of the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012948
Although, the statement is unsigned, given the absence of any disqualifications, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 25 January 1963 through 24 January 1966, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. The evidence of record also shows that based on his active duty service during a qualifying period, the applicant is entitled to the NDSM, and that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018511
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year. However, the evidence shows he was awarded the AFEM...