Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015861
Original file (20090015861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
		BOARD DATE:	  15 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090015861 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that he completed 2 years of active duty service by changing the date of his release.

2.  The applicant states that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied him benefits because he had not served on active duty for a period of 2 years. He wants his date of release changed from 25 October 1984 to 28 October 1984.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 29 October 1982, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 2 years.  He completed his initial training and was assigned to Germany for duty as a unit armorer.

3.  On 18 September 1984, the applicant returned to the United States.

4.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 25 October 1984.  The narrative reason was completion of his term of service.  He had attained the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4, and had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 27 days of active duty service.

5.   Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) effective in 1979, provided detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provided a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  This regulation was revised in September 2000 to require a statement in Item 18 (Remarks) to indicate that the Soldier had or had not completed his first full term of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that he completed his 2 years of active duty service.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant enlisted for a period of 2 years, performed his duty honorably, and was released from active duty on
25 October 1984, a few days prior to the expiration of his term of service.  The narrative reason on his DD Form 214 indicates that he had completed his active duty obligation.

3.  The governing regulation at the time did not recognize Soldiers who were released early as having completed their full term of service.  This was corrected in a subsequent version of the regulation by adding a mandatory statement indicating the Soldier had or had not completed his first full term of service.

4.  It would not be appropriate to add active duty service to the applicant's DD Form 214 that he did not serve.  Therefore, his date of release should not be changed.  However, as a matter of equity, Item 18 of the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to add the now mandatory statement showing that he had completed his first full term of service.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x_____  ____x____  ___x__  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to Item 18 of his DD Form 214 the entry "Soldier has completed his first full term of service."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing the date of his release from active duty.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015861



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015861



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008993

    Original file (20080008993.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that he completed 2 years of creditable active service. There is no evidence in the applicant's military records which shows that he consented to be released from active duty prior to his established ETS date of 4 November 1984. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that he completed 2 years of creditable active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007729

    Original file (20090007729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to Item 12b (Separated Date This Period) and Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 22 May 1984. The evidence shows the applicant enlisted for 2 years and completed his required active service. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice at this time to correct the applicant’s DD Form 214 dated 22 May 1984 to show in Item 18 (Remarks) that “The individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008248

    Original file (20110008248.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the narrative reason for his separation as hardship instead of the reason currently shown. It provides that veterans who enlisted after September 7, 1980, or who entered active duty after 16 October 1981, must have served 24 continuous months or the full period for which they were called to active duty in order to be eligible. Nevertheless, the evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005517

    Original file (20110005517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The governing regulation indicates that Soldiers returned in this manner were considered to have completed their full term of active duty service. At the time of the applicant's separation, the governing regulation did not require a remark on the DD Form 214 to clarify that the Soldier had or had not completed his/her first full term of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to Item 18 of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010542

    Original file (20100010542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Education Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 2 March 2005 to show "Yes" instead of "No" which will allow him to use his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the "No" block is marked in item 15a. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006879

    Original file (20120006879.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his DD Form 214 only shows his last discharge from the Army, it does not show his two periods of honorable service from May 1979 through October 1985 * his two periods of honorable service override his discharge under other than honorable conditions and, when properly documented, enable him to receive veterans' benefits 3. Consequently, he is not authorized separate DD Forms 214 for his initial period of enlistment and subsequent period of reenlistment because DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007428

    Original file (20100007428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the “Yes” block in Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran’s Educations Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 October 2002 be checked instead of the “No” block which will allow him to use his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the “Yes” block is marked in Item 15a. He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows the “No”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006622

    Original file (20130006622.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect he served 24 months of active duty. The applicant states: * he enlisted for a period of 2 years and intended to serve for 2 years * the Army gave him an honorable discharge and processed him out of the service 13 days short of the 2-year period * he did not request early separation * he was unaware the early separation would affect his eligibility for benefits or he would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023920

    Original file (20100023920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence shows that on 31 August 1995 the applicant was informed in writing of the error on his DD Form 214 that this error would be corrected by ARPERCEN. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct item 18 of his DD Form 214 entry to show the applicant in fact completed his first full term of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 18 of his DD Form 214 the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011511

    Original file (20070011511.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, on file in the applicant's service record shows he last enlisted in the Army Reserve on 8 November 1990 for a period of six years. There is no indication in the applicant's service record that he requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve at the expiration of his AGR and US Army Reserve service contracts. This authority is entered on the DD Form 214 for Enlisted Soldiers who are separated from active duty at the completion of their...