Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015664
Original file (20090015664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  23 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090015664 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his status was missing in action (MIA).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that Army officials notified his wife that he was MIA; however, his records are not documented to show he was MIA.  This happened to him and he wants to resolve it so that he may have peace of mind. 

3.  The applicant provides an undated self-authored statement in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Having had prior service, the applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 November 1988 and held military occupational specialty 63B (Light Wheel Vehicle Mechanic).  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 1st Cavalry.

3.  His records also show he served in Southwest Asia (SWA) in support of Operations Desert Shield/Storm from 26 December 1990 to 15 May 1991.

4.  He was honorably discharged on 23 October 1992 by reason of completion of his term of service.

5.  The available evidence does not show he was reported as MIA.  The following sources were reviewed:

	a.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), Item 27 (Remarks)  does not reflect he was an MIA during his service in SWA. 

	b.  The available evidence does not contain a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) changing his duty status from "Present For Duty" to MIA or any other status.

	c.  His name is not shown on any official Army documents (messages or notifications) as MIA.

	d.  There are no statements by his commander or a line of duty investigation in his records that show he was MIA.

	e.  The applicant's name is not listed on the casualty roster maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command. 

6.  He submitted an undated self-authored statement wherein he indicated, in effect, that during his service in SWA, he and another Soldier were riding in a military truck in a convoy when they were fired upon.  As the fire-fight continued, his commander instructed him to stay with the disabled vehicle.  The convoy eventually departed but he and another sergeant were left behind.  One night, Iraqi scouts spotted them and captured them.  The next thing he remembers was that a Reserve unit picked them up and cared for them for about 20 days.  He ultimately returned to his unit and was informed by his platoon leader that it was better to lose 2 Soldiers than 7 or 8 Soldiers.  He lost his temper and hit the officer but continued his tour with the unit.  He feels he is being left all over again. His feelings have never subsided.  Several members of his immediate family either served or are serving in the Army.  His family has put it on the line.  He just wants to be recognized for what happened to him in the performance of his duties. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant failed to submit any substantiating evidence to show he was MIA or captured during his service in SWA.  A number of sources were reviewed and none reported him as MIA.  In the absence of documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was missing or captured, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the request relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x___  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015664



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015664



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016548

    Original file (20080016548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he was assigned to Company E (not Company D), 28th Infantry Regiment, 8th Infantry Division, during World War II when he was captured by the Germans and held as a POW at Port of Brest, France, for somewhere between 26 and 28 days in August 1944. a. There is no evidence that the applicant submitted an application or letter to the National Personnel Records Center to request a determination of his POW status and/or award of the POW Medal. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017162C071029

    Original file (20060017162C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017162 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request that his record be corrected to show his Prisoner of War (POW) status. The applicant provides a self-authored statement as new evidence in which he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010660

    Original file (20080010660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: a. XXX ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013727

    Original file (20110013727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    9th Infantry Division in Vietnam from 15 May 1970 through 28 September 1970; b. receipt of a shrapnel wound to his hip on 24 August 1970; c. medical evacuation from Vietnam with hospitalization at the 249th General Hospital and Great Lakes Naval Hospital from 29 August 1970 through 23 November 1970; and d. returned to Vietnam and served as a gunner with Troop A, 4th Squadron, 12th Cavalry regiment, 1st Brigade, 5th Infantry Division from 17 May 1971 through 5 February 1972. The time line...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007777

    Original file (20100007777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separations) to show his prisoner of war (POW) status and his unit of assignment as the 110th Infantry instead of the 116th Infantry. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the POW Medal, correct his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show his POW status and the POW medal. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the World War II Victory Medal and American Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012830

    Original file (20100012830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The commander's inquiry determined: * the applicant had fired on or ordered the firing on of several dogs where the military necessity for killing the animals was lacking * on or about 26 January 2008, he fired his 9-millimeter pistol at a discarded flak vest at Iraqi Police Station 5W when there was no reason to do so * on or about the last week in December 2007, the applicant ordered his gunner to fire at a suspected IED on Tampa instead of cordoning the area and calling the explosive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009295

    Original file (20130009295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His reconsideration request to HRC for award of the Silver Star which included the following summary prepared by Colonel (Retired) D____ T. M____ who stated: (1) On 1 March 2011, the HRC Awards and Decorations Branch disapproved a number of awards including the Silver Star for the applicant, the Silver Star for First Sergeant J____ C____, and four awards of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for Soldiers whom the applicant had recommended for those awards. It suggested that he should...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013166

    Original file (20090013166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Among them, the 157th Infantry Brigade had no legal standing to conduct the FLIPL; the FLIPL IO failed to show that each Soldier’s actions were the "proximate cause" for the vehicle accident; the IO applied a "simple negligence" standard; the IO applied the incorrect standard of a "group liability" which does not exist under Army Regulation 735-5; the FLIPL should have identified each Soldier’s individual liability, as mitigated by the actions of any other person; the IO investigated the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013322

    Original file (20100013322.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was awarded a posthumous Purple Heart after having been reported KIA. The evidence of record shows the applicant was captured on 3 December 1950 in Korea and he was released on 14 August 1953. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 3 December 1950 and adding it to his DD Form 214; and b. adding to item 38 of his DD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03684

    Original file (BC-2002-03684.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPWCM recommends the applicant’s request for award of the POW Medal be denied. On 22 October 1944, he provided the information that immediately after being shot down, he was picked up by partisans, evading capture by the enemy. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded he should be awarded the PH, DFC, and POW Medal.