IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 27 April 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090015321
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge.
2. The applicant states he wants his discharge upgraded so that he may be eligible for medical and other benefits.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on
8 October 1963.
3. On 28 October 1965 the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of one specification of being absent without leave (AWOL) from 28 April to
8 October 1965. His punishment was a forfeiture of pay, reduction in rank, and confinement.
4. The specific facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants discharge processing are not available for review. However, the available evidence does include a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that provides the following information:
* Reason and Authority: Army Regulation 600-200 (Personnel Separations)
* Separation Program Number (SPN): 28B (frequent involvement of a
discreditable nature with civil or military authorities)
* Effective Date: 29 March 1966
* Days Lost: 533 days
* Net Active Service: 11 months and 29 days
* Type of Certificate Issued: DD Form 258A (Undesirable Discharge Certificate)
5. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. This regulation provided, in pertinent part, that members involved in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities were subject to separation for unfitness. An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.
6. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
7. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
8. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPN), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation from active duty, provided the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPN to be entered on the DD Form 214. It identified the SPN of 28B as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers discharged for frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge processing, it does contain a properly-constituted
DD Form 214 that identifies the authority, reason, and the characterization of his service.
2. This ABCMR operates under the standard of presumption of regularity in governmental affairs. This standard provides that in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the actions taken by the military were proper. There was nothing presented by the applicant and there is nothing in the available records that overcomes this presumption.
3. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe the applicant was appropriately issued an undesirable discharge.
4. In view of the above, there is no basis for granting the applicant relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__X____ __X_____ __X_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X___ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090015321
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025211
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant's administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness - frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military authorities was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023125
However, there is a DD Form 214 on file that shows the applicant received a UD on 11 December 1971. There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15 year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005965
However, there is a DD Form 214 on file that shows the applicant received a UD on 18 March 1969. The separation authority could issue an honorable discharge (HD) or general discharge (GD) under honorable conditions if warranted by the member's overall record of service; however, a UD was normally considered appropriate for members separating under these provisions. There is no evidence on file and the applicant has failed to provide any evidence to support this claim.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004646
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. The separation authority could issue an honorable discharge (HD) or general discharge (GD) under honorable conditions if warranted by the member's overall record of service; however, a UD was normally considered appropriate for members...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002486
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Numbers), in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge, provided the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPN to be entered on the DD Form 214. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022693
The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. He further states the CIB was on page 21 of the Form OSA 172 (Discharge Review). On 8 December 1976, the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge so he could reenter military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002141
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) currently provides the Army's enlisted administrative separation policy: a. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016700
The applicant's DA Form 20 also shows, in item 44 (Time Lost Under Section 972, Title 10, USC), he accrued 493 days of lost time during four separate periods of AWOL and one period of confinement between 16 October 1970 and 20 July 1972. The separation authority could issue an honorable discharge (HD) or general discharge (GD) under honorable conditions if warranted by the member's overall record of service; however, a UD was normally considered appropriate for members separating under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004940
However, his record contains a duly-constituted DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that shows he was discharged on 9 January 1970 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability) by reason of unfitness with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 9 September 2009, the ABCMR addressed his medical issues...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018385
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Based on his record of indiscipline, SPCM conviction and record of AWOL, the applicant's service clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...