Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015027
Original file (20090015027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  27 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090015027 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device.

2.  The applicant states that he feels that he should have been awarded the ARCOM with ”V” Device because he served as an armor reconaissance scout in Vietnam with an air cavalry unit in helicopters and was constantly in firefights as the front for infantry units.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States in Charlotte, NC on 17 September 1969.  He successfully completed his training as an armor reconnaissance specialist and he was transferred to Vietnam on 20 February 1970 for assignment to F Troop, 8th Cavalry Regiment as an armor reconnaissance scout.  He was advanced to the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 21 May 1970.

3.  He departed Vietnam on 19 April 1971 and he was transferred to Fort Lewis, WA where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee on 20 April 1971.  His DD Form 214 shows he served 1 year,
7 months, and 4 days of total active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), ARCOM, 1 overseas service bar, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  There are no automatic entitlements to this award.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the bronze “V” device indicates acts of heroism involving conflict with an armed enemy and authorizes the bronze “V” device in conjunction with awards of the Army Commendation Medal, the Air Medal, and the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states it is the responsibility of any individual having personal knowledge of an act, achievement, or service believed to warrant the award of a decoration to submit a formal recommendation into military command channels for consideration within 2 years of the act, achievement, or service to be honored.  The Army does not condone self-recognition; therefore, a Soldier may not recommend himself/herself for award of a decoration.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he should have been awarded the ARCOM with “V” Device is not in question, he has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application any evidence to support his contention.

2.  The award of the ARCOM and the “V” Device are not automatic entitlements and must be properly justified and approved by the appropriate authorities before being awarded.

3.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to award the applicant the ARCOM with “V” Device.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x______  __x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015027



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090015027



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021995

    Original file (20100021995.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device instead of just the Bronze Star Medal and two awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000292

    Original file (20070000292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000292 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army Commendation Medal, with "V" Device, be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and that he be awarded the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000937C070208

    Original file (20040000937C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Larry J. Olson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. His DD Form 214 lists his authorized awards as the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Sharpshooter Badge with Rifle Bar. Issuing orders showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 7 June 1969, and; b. showing that his authorized awards include the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020271

    Original file (20130020271.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The letter of support provided by the applicant is not sufficient evidence by itself to correct his records because the author does not state nor does he provide orders announcing the applicant was awarded the medals. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001764

    Original file (20090001764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 May 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090001764 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's OMPF includes orders that awarded the applicant the BSM with "V" Device, PH, and ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 12 June 1969 through 13 November 1970; b. amending item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012786

    Original file (20110012786.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * RVN Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Air Medal * Army Commendation Medal 5. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded an infantry MOS and he was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the RVN. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019753

    Original file (20110019753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004446

    Original file (20080004446.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214, lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal with "1960-" Device, Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with [M-16] Rifle Bar. There is no available evidence of record showing that the applicant was awarded a second Army Commendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021024

    Original file (20090021024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following: * Parachutist Badge * Army Commendation (ARCOM) Medal with "V" device * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device * Air Medal (AM) * Primary Military Occupational Specialty (PMOS) - 11B4P 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058833C070421

    Original file (2001058833C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart (PH), the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) as authorized awards. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) lists the BSM with "V" Device, the PH, and the ARCOM. General Order Number 896 awarded the applicant the BSM for meritorious service; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form...