Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014941
Original file (20090014941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		BOARD DATE:	  19 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014941 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code on his DD Form 
214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 11 February 2002 be changed.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the reason he was discharged was because he refused to jump from aircraft and that he was trying to get out of his unit.  The applicant further states that he needs his RE code changed so that he may enlist in the National Guard or the Reserve.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 August 2000 and successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 92Y (Unit Supply Specialist).

3.  Following successful completion of the Basic Airborne Course, the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 
505th Parachute Infantry Regiment, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, on 14 June 2001.

4.  On 23 August 2001, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for failure to be at his appointed place of duty.

5.  The applicant's record reveals a disciplinary history that includes his acceptance of general counseling statements on the following dates:  

* 10 June 2001 for failure to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT)
* 29 June 2001 for failure to be at his appointed place of duty
* 6 July 2001 for failure to pass a diagnostic APFT
* 9 July 2001 for failure to be at his appointed place of duty
* 14 August 2001 for failure to report to duty, for being away from duty without pass, and for traveling outside authorized radius without sufficient funds
* 28 August 2001 for failure to follow instructions
* 29 August 2001 for failure to follow instructions
* 30 August 2001 for failure to follow instructions
* 1 December 2001 for lack of motivation

6.  On 4 December 2001, the applicant accepted NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for being derelict in performance of duties [willfully failed to jump from an aircraft].

7.  On 5 December 2001, the applicant was suspended from airborne status.

8.  The applicant's record reveals additional disciplinary history that includes his acceptance of a general counseling statement on 8 December 2001 for lack of motivation during a company road march.

9.  On 12 January 2002, the applicant’s commander initiated elimination action on the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for commission of a serious offense.  The reason cited by the commander was the applicant's wrongful failure to jump from an aircraft on two occasions.

10.  On 16 January 2002, the applicant was advised by consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated separation action.  The applicant was advised of the impact of the discharge action.  The applicant signed a statement indicating that he was advised he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c.  The applicant requested counsel and elected to submit a statement on his own behalf.  The applicant's statement is not in his records.

11.  On 25 January 2002, the appropriate authority approved the elimination packet and directed the applicant receive an honorable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct.  On 
11 February 2002, the applicant was discharged after completing 1 year, 
5 months, and 12 days of creditable active service with no lost time

12.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, for "MISCONDUCT" and item 
27 (Reentry Code) shows the entry "3."

13.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Paragraph 14-12c states that Soldiers are subject to separation for commission of a serious offense.  
  
14.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve.  Paragraph 3-21 of the regulation states that RE 3 applies to a Soldier who is not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but the disqualification is waivable. 

15.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) states that the SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty.  The "JKQ" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers discharged (involuntarily) under chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct.  


16.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE Code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers.  This cross reference table, in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge, shows the SPD code of "JKQ" has a corresponding RE code of "3."

17.  Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria.  They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 601-210.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The ABCMR does not change records solely to allow former Soldiers to reenter the service.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations, to include the RE 3 code assignment.  Lacking independent evidence to the contrary, it is determined that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Therefore, the assigned RE 3 code was appropriate.  

2.  However, this does not mean that the applicant has been completely denied the opportunity to enlist.  Since he is eligible to apply for a waiver, he has the option of visiting his local recruiting station and consulting with recruiting personnel who are required to process a waiver request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014941





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014941



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002550

    Original file (20090002550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 February 1992, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for a change in the character and/or reason of his discharge. The regulation shows that the separation program designator “JKQ” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as “Misconduct-Commission of a Serious Offense” and that the authority for discharge under this separation program designator is “Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c." In the absence of evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008941

    Original file (20100008941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 8 January 2002, the company commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action to effect his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), chapter 14 (Misconduct), paragraph 14-12c, based on commission of a serious offense. On 1 February 2002, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, and directed the applicant be given an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016306

    Original file (20080016306.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his character of service, separation authority, separation code, reentry (RE) code, and the narrative reason for his separation on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed. The DD Form 214 also shows that his character of service was general, under honorable conditions; the separation authority was Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) (commission of a serious offense - abuse of illegal drugs); the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015836

    Original file (20080015836.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was told by his squadron commander that he would have an RE code that would allow him to reenter the military after 4 years. The SPD code of JKK was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance provided in this regulation for Soldiers separating under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c(2), Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct - drug abuse. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was separated from the service for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011668

    Original file (20060011668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued at the time confirms that he held the rank of private/E-1 (PV1), and had completed a total 3 years, 8 months and 1 day of active military service. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, by regulation, the RE-4 code assigned to the applicant was the proper code to assign members...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073317C070403

    Original file (2002073317C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 August 1996, the applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. He was given an RE code of 4. There is no evidence of Government error in this case; the applicant was given the correct RE code of 4 at the time based upon his reason for separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001284

    Original file (20070001284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Fields Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was separated from the service for misconduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2). The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulations, to include the RE code 4 code assignment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009105

    Original file (20120009105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that the SPD code of JKK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct (drug abuse). Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004833

    Original file (AR20130004833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 March 2002, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicant’s record of service, his military records, the document and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Therefore and as approved by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020977

    Original file (20090020977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 December 2002 to show: * completion of first full term of service * rank/grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 instead of private (PV1)/E-1 * reentry eligibility (RE) code of 1 instead RE code 3 2. There is no evidence in the applicant's record that shows he was advanced to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 during his period of service. The applicant contends that his...