Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014895
Original file (20090014895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014895 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

2.  The applicant states that he received the award of the ARCOM during the Gulf War from the 410th Evacuation Hospital and it was not entered on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides an unauthenticated (unsigned) copy of an ARCOM Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was serving in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in pay grade E-4 when he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm on 21 November 1990.

3.  He deployed to Southwest Asia (SWA) on 27 January 1991 and served with the 410th Evacuation Hospital.  He departed SWA on 9 May 1991 and was transferred to Fort Riley, KS where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 4 June 1991 and returned to his USAR unit.  He had served 6 months and 14 days of active duty and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon and the National Defense Service Medal.

4.  A DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) issued on 2 October 1992 shows that he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze service stars and the Kuwait Liberation Medal.

5.  A review of his official records failed to reveal a copy of orders awarding the applicant the ARCOM.

6.  The ARCOM certificate provided by the applicant is unauthenticated by the hospital commander and indicates that the ARCOM was awarded for meritorious service during the period 1 February to 22 March 1991.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguished himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was awarded the ARCOM for his service in SWA is not in doubt, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted and the evidence of record sufficient evidence to warrant the entry of that award into his records.

2.  The certificate provided by the applicant is not signed by the awarding commander and there is no evidence of any orders announcing that award, which is a prerequisite for establishing/announcing an official award.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of orders announcing the award of the ARCOM, there appears to be no basis to add that award to his records.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X__  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014895



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014895



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008753

    Original file (20090008753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to document his foreign service and all earned awards. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. As a result, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's record and DD Form 214 to document SWA service from 1 January through 13 June 1991, as confirmed by the DFAS record by amending item 12f and item 18 accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006985

    Original file (20140006985.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant's service in support of ODS in SWA qualified him for award of the: (1) SWASM and he participated in three campaigns during his service in SWA. d. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 29 April 1988 through 28 April 1991. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007471

    Original file (20120007471.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show his SWA service nor does it list all of his awards and decorations. The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he served with the 1st Battalion, 15th Infantry Regiment in Germany through 11 June 1991, and with the 3rd Battalion, 7th Infantry Regiment, Fort Stewart, Georgia, from 12 July 1991 through his separation date on 26 February 1993. The applicant also provides an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) certificate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016174

    Original file (20080016174.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record clearly shows that she deployed to Southwest Asia in support of Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm from 16 January 1991 to 11 March 1991. The applicant was a member of the United States Army Reserve when she was ordered to active duty in support of Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm and served in Southwest Asia from 16 January 1991 to 11 March 1991. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018855

    Original file (20090018855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his Gulf War deployment be documented on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and he be issued a DD Form 215 (DD Form 214 Correction). The record contains permanent deployment and award orders which confirm the applicant was deployed to SWA in support of Desert Storm for the period of 14 February 1991 through 2 May 1991. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his deployment time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012070

    Original file (20070012070.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 14 May 1991, be corrected to show all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded four awards of the ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by adding the already-awarded Good Conduct Medal,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006998

    Original file (20100006998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier petition to add the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) to his record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Further, the third-party statement provided from a Soldier who served with the applicant during Operation Desert Storm corroborates his participation in combat operations with the unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000051

    Original file (20130000051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and Valorous Unit Award (VUA) and any other medals, citations and awards to which he is entitled. He provides an ARCOM award certificate, a listing of units awarded VUA, and DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious achievement in combat operations during the period 17 January 1991 to 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082679C070215

    Original file (2002082679C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show entitlement to award of the Army Commendation Medal with 1 st oak leaf cluster, the Good Conduct Medal (second award) and to show that he served two periods in Southwest Asia (SWA). The evidence of record clearly shows entitlement to the first award of the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct Medal (2d Award) for the period 25 September 1987 to 24 September 1990 and completion of two separate periods of service in SWA from 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005570

    Original file (20090005570.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to document his Gulf War service and by adding the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM and ARCOM, as evidenced by orders he provided and by a certificate and orders on file in his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...