Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014801
Original file (20090014801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014801 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an honorable discharge.  

2.  The applicant states he made a pass at a bartender after she flirted with him several times.  Afterwards, she reported him for harassment. 

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of this case.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  With prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed a Reserve commissioned second lieutenant, Quartermaster (QM) Corps on 3 December 1988.  He was assigned to the 194th Armored Brigade, Fort Knox, Kentucky. 
3.  On 4 May 1992, the Commander, 194th Armored Brigade, issued the applicant a Memorandum of Reprimand (MOR) for indecently assaulting a female employee at a post club after he grabbed her breast and made lewd comments to her.  The Commander's investigation learned the applicant had a history of harassing women in the Brigade and at Fort Knox.  The applicant acknowledged receipt of the MOR and elected not to make a statement.  

4.  Also on 4 May 1992, the applicant tendered his resignation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-120, chapter 3, due to conduct-related circumstances.  He acknowledged his resignation would be under honorable conditions and he would receive either an Honorable or General Discharge Certificate, as determined by Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA).

5.  On 23 July 1992, HQDA approved the applicant’s resignation and directed he receive a General Discharge Certificate.

6.  The Army discharged the applicant on 15 August 1992 with 3 years, 
5 months, and 24 days of creditable active service as a commissioned officer.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-120 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of officer personnel from the active Army.  Chapter 3 provides the policies and procedures for officers requesting unqualified resignation for miscellaneous reasons.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant’s discharge was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.  His request for resignation was properly submitted to HQDA and upon review of the facts and circumstances it was approved with the issuance of a general discharge under honorable conditions.  The applicant’s characterization of service was appropriate.  The quality of his service was not consistent with Army standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014801



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014801



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011079

    Original file (20060011079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 5 December 2003. The evidence of record shows that Permanent Orders awarded the applicant the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious achievement for the period 20 January 1989 to 14 March 1989. The evidence of record also shows that Permanent Orders awarded the applicant the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009807

    Original file (20090009807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant nor counsel have provided no evidence or a convincing argument to show his discharge should be upgraded and his military records contain no evidence which would entitle him to an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509356C070209

    Original file (9509356C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests that the Separation Program Designator (SPD) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, for the period covering 30 September 1980 through 27 August 1991, be corrected to a code which would entitle him to full separation pay. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows that he was assigned the SPD of “BNC.” Army Regulation 635-120, Officer Resignations and Discharges, chapter 4, provides for any officer to tender a resignation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000416

    Original file (20100000416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests that he be issued a separate DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for his period of service that was characterized as honorable. The applicant provides copies of: * a letter, dated 10 February 2004, from the Defiance County Veterans' Service Commission - Veterans' Affairs, Defiance, OH * a Standard Form 180 (Request Pertaining to Military Records) * a letter, dated 16 June 1997, from the Defiance County Veterans' Service Commission * his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025355

    Original file (20100025355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service was characterized as under other than honorable conditions. On 9 July 1982, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge. He has provided no evidence or a convincing argument to show his discharge should be upgraded and his military records contain no evidence which would entitle him to an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022517

    Original file (20120022517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally he requests his records and/or DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show: * his reason for restarting basic training * he qualified with the hand grenade * the Tube-launched, Optically-tracked, Wire-guided missile (TOW) Gunnery course * the 194th Armored Calvary as his unit of assignment * letters from his Congressman 2. There is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004517

    Original file (20140004517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following: * a change of the narrative reason shown in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) from misconduct to an administrative discharge * issuance of a new DD Form 214 with this change 2. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 23 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017714

    Original file (20120017714.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he served in Southwest Asia (SWA) during Operation Desert Shield/Storm (ODS) and all of his authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 12, block f of his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010678

    Original file (20110010678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. General Discharge Certificate (under honorable conditions) may be issued when: * unqualified resignation in circumstances involving serious misconduct * discharge because of serious misconduct, including misconduct for which punishment has been imposed, which renders the officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017872

    Original file (20130017872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a request to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for upgrade of her discharge. On 14 June 1983, the applicant was provided a copy of the ADRB decision document in order for her to submit a rebuttal to the minority view of the board's statements, to be considered by the Secretarial Reviewing Authority prior to taking action on her case. Considering the applicant successfully completed training, was awarded two specialties, and was promoted to first lieutenant, her...