Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014742
Original file (20090014742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


		BOARD DATE:	  8 April 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014742 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he served in combat and that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that he desires to be awarded the CIB in order to receive Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits as well as for personal reasons.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was involuntarily ordered to active duty from the U.S. Army Corps on 19 February 1968 in military occupational specialty (MOS) 36K (Field Communications Crewman) for a period of 18 months and 17 days.  His initial assignment was to Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

3.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 18 October 1968 and was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 1st Squadron, 9th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, for duty as a wireman.

4.  On 14 July 1969, he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for meritorious service during the period of August 1968 to August 1969.

5.  He departed Vietnam on 25 August 1969 and was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California, where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 30 August 1969 as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 6 months, and 11 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the BSM.

6.  A review of his official records fails to show that the applicant ever held the MOS of an infantryman or that he served as an infantryman who engaged in combat with enemy Soldiers.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer personnel who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record that he ever held the MOS of an infantryman or that he performed the duties of an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit that engaged the enemy in combat.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to award him the CIB.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  __x______  __x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014742



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014742



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060017047C071029

    Original file (AR20060017047C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 July 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060017047 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant goes on to state that the retired colonel believes that he should be awarded the CIB for his action in the fire fights that he participated in while he was a member of the LRRP serving as an infantryman. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005996

    Original file (20090005996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 20 contains an entry in item 38 that shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS in an infantry unit for a little over 3 months while he was serving in the RVN. As a result, absent any evidence of his personal participation in active ground combat with his qualifying infantry unit while serving as an infantryman, the regulatory requirements necessary to support award of the CIB have not been met in this case. Item 41 of his DA Form 20 does not include the PH in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018817

    Original file (20110018817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was an infantryman with an infantry MOS; he served in an infantry (cavalry) unit; he was wounded in action and received the Purple Heart. The applicant has been awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the – * BSM * Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 7 June 1967 to 6 June 1969 * CIB * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006800

    Original file (20090006800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his 25 February 1969 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding the Silver Star (SS), Air Medals (AMs), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and any other earned awards and decorations. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was not awarded MOS 11B until 29 July 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007470

    Original file (20090007470.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the BSM with "V" Device and BSM for meritorious service he earned are not listed on his DD Form 214, and he was a 91B (Medical Specialist) assigned to a rifle platoon and should have been awarded the CMB. Given the applicant's cavalry squadron commander confirmed in a 15 June 1968 request that the unit had an organic rifle platoon and that the applicant served as that platoon's medic and had been present with the unit on numerous occasions when it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001115C070205

    Original file (20060001115C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Gerald Purcell | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He completed his training and was transferred to Vietnam on 12 October 1967, for assignment to Company D, 1st Battalion, 26th Infantry Regiment as a light weapons infantryman. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the BSM w/”V” Device and by awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016028

    Original file (20080016028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board further determined that the applicant was not awarded SMOS 11F until 13 October 1969, subsequent to his RVN service, and that his record failed to show he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM with “V” Device for Valor. The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007986

    Original file (20140007986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Master Parachutist Badge and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) (2nd Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 June 1968 the VSM and the BSM; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 June 1968 – * Master...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073827C070403

    Original file (2002073827C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. While neither the applicant’s military records nor the historical files of his command contain any evidence that the applicant was awarded the BSM, the BSM Certificate submitted by the applicant along with the fact that the NPRC issued the applicant the BSM is convincing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006605

    Original file (20120006605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There are no orders in his records awarding him the CIB or BSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the CIB, effective 27 June 1968; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * CIB * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badges with Rifle (M-16) and Machine Gun Bars * Republic of Vietnam...