IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 09 March 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090014529
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded and all of his qualification badges be added to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).
2. The applicant states he was treated unfairly and made an example of at the U.S. Army Retraining Brigade. He had to do more than everyone else and lasted almost a month before he could not take any more and requested discharge. Although his rifle qualification badge is on his DD Form 214, his award of the Air Assault Badge and the pistol qualification badge are not. He is currently participating in an alcohol abuse program.
3. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and personal statements in support of his contentions.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 1977, completed training, and was awarded military occupational specialty 16P (Chaparral Crewman).
3. The applicant was absent without leave (AWOL) from 6 through 10 December 1977. Upon return to military control he was placed in pretrial confinement.
4. On 30 December 1977 a special court-martial found him guilty of 5 days of AWOL and communicating a threat to do bodily injury.
5. The applicant was AWOL again from 7 through 16 February 1978. Upon return to military control he was placed in pretrial confinement.
6. On 24 February 1978 a special court-martial found him guilty of being AWOL for 10 days and breaking restriction. His sentence included confinement for 2 months.
7. The available record does not contain any documentation related to his separation processing.
8. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 20 April 1978 under other than honorable conditions for a pattern of misconduct in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 14-33b. He had 60 days of lost time. His awards are listed as the "Rifle (M-16 Badge)" and "Hand Grenade Badge," but no level of qualification is recorded.
9. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) provides the following:
a. the applicant did not complete basic airborne training,
b. he was permanently disqualified from airborne training due to a lack of motivation and self-imposed withdrawal, and
c. the applicant was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar.
10. The applicant's record does not contain any orders for any awards, decorations, or badges.
11. The applicant's record does not contain any indication of participation in any air assault training programs.
12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), in pertinent part, sets forth requirements for award of the Air Assault Badge. Award of the Air Assault Badge requires that an individual must have satisfactorily completed an air assault training course according to the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command standardized Air Assault Core Program of Instruction or have completed the standard Air Assault Course while assigned or attached to the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) after 1 April 1974.
13. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. As then in effect, it provided:
a. Chapter 3 outlined the criteria for characterization of service. Paragraph 3-7a stated an honorable discharge was a separation with honor. The honorable characterization of service was appropriate when the quality of the Soldier's service generally met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty. Paragraph 3-7a(1) stated, "A Soldier will not necessarily be denied an honorable discharge solely by reason of a specific number of convictions by court-martial or actions under the UCMJ Article 15
It is a pattern of behavior and not the isolated instance which should be considered the governing factor in determination of character of service." Paragraph 3-7b stated a general discharge was a separation under honorable conditions issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not so meritorious as to warrant an honorable discharge. Paragraph 3-7c stated an under other than honorable conditions discharge was issued when there were one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from conduct expected of a Soldier.
b. Chapter 14 established policy and prescribed procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories included a pattern of misconduct (consisting of discreditable involvement with civil or military authorities or conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline). Action would be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it was clearly established that rehabilitation was impracticable or was unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.
14. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). Paragraph 2-9 states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant states he was treated unfairly and made an example of at the U.S. Army Retraining Brigade. He had to do more than everyone else and lasted almost a month before he could not take any more and requested discharge. His award of the Air Assault Badge and the pistol qualification badge are not on his DD Form 214. He is currently participating in an alcohol abuse program.
2. The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any documentation showing completion of any air assault training; therefore award of the Air Assault Badge is not warranted.
3. There is no documentation that the applicant qualified at any level with a pistol.
4. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall record.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X_______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090014529
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090014529
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018781
Additionally, he is eligible for award of SQI "P" (Parachutist) and correction of his DD Form 214 to show he successfully completed airborne training. However, this course is recorded on his DD Form 214. However, this course is recorded on his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081177C070215
In pertinent part it states that item 14 (military education) will list formal in service training courses, successfully completed during the period of service covered, by title, length in weeks, and month and year completed. Evidence available to the Board indicates that the Dragon Gunners Course did not meet the requirements for inclusion on the applicant’s separation document and as such, inclusion of that course on his separation document would be inappropriate. The evidence available...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009089
There are no orders for the Air Assault Badge in the applicant's service personnel records. There is also no evidence of record that shows he completed an Air Assault course. This document shows that during the time of the applicants assignment to 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry the unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 9 August 1965 to 19 May 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 56, dated 1969.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000063
The applicant states: * he served in the Army from 3 November 1977 to 30 July 1984 with elite units of the Airborne Corps in Italy and Panama * he received awards, decorations, and badges * he achieved the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5 * he was proud to wear the uniform and be an airborne Soldier * he made mistakes at the end of his enlistment and he showed behavioral problems * his command missed what was happening to him as he was in the early stages of schizophrenia and he suffered from...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003079C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show training as a Jungle Expert and Ranger Elite. There is no indication that he completed any additional training while in the Army and his records contain no evidence of an award of the Expert Infantryman Badge, the Combat Infantryman Badge, or qualification in any weapons other than as a sharpshooter with the M-16 rifle. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that a marksmanship qualification badge is awarded to indicate the degree in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005312
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank/grade as that of a SGT/E-5; award of the Presidential Unit Citation, the Presidential Unit Certificate, the Good Conduct Medal, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle M-16), the Expert...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016896
On 25 February 1980, the applicant's commander informed him he was initiating separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-31 (Expeditious Discharge Program). The applicant requests to be paid for about 80 days of leave, which he asserts he accrued while on active duty and should have been paid on separation. Regarding the accrued leave for which the applicant could be paid, neither the applicant's record nor...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014355
Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star, Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Parachutist Badge, one overseas service bar, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. General orders awarded the applicants unit of assignment the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002066379C070402
On 6 November 1978, the separation authority approved the board of officers recommendation and directed that the applicant be discharged from the service for misconduct due to frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with a general discharge. In accordance with a recommendation from a board of officers, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a general discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct. The Board reviewed the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007906
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Evidence of record shows that the applicant successfully completed the Parachute Rigger course conducted by the U.S. Army Quartermaster School and held an awarded MOS of 43E. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Parachute Rigger Badge and correction of...