Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014490
Original file (20090014490.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014490 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his award of the CIB was omitted from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and it was not until he attended his reunion that he realized it. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, letters from his commander and squad leader, a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), a copy of his Purple Heart Certificate and orders, and a copy of his separation orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was inducted on 17 June 1968.  He completed his basic training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and was transferred to Fort Ord, California to attend advanced individual training (AIT) as a light weapons infantryman.   

3.  He completed his AIT and was transferred to Vietnam on 14 November 1968 and was assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 52nd Infantry Regiment, 198th Infantry Brigade for duty as a rifleman.  He was advanced to the rank of private first class on 16 November 1968.

4.  On 21 June 1969, he received fragmentation wounds to the chest, left hand and leg and head while on a search and clear mission and engaged a hostile force in a firefight.  He was initially evacuated to the 312th Evacuation Hospital in Chu Lai, South Vietnam, where he was awarded the Purple Heart and then to the 106th General Hospital in Japan.

5.  He was subsequently transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri where he served as a prisoner escort until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 17 March 1970 to attend school.  He had served 1 year, 9 months, and 1 day of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Purple Heart.

6.  A review of the applicant’s official records fails to show that he was ever awarded the CIB.  However, his records do contain orders showing that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) on 16 March 1970 and that award was omitted from his DD Form 214.  His records also show that he participated in three campaigns in Vietnam.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer personnel who have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS).  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for the wear of a bronze service star on the appropriate service medal, including the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign participation.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation for the period he was assigned to the unit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was wounded in action against the enemy while serving as an infantryman assigned to an infantry company in Vietnam on 21 June 1969.  Accordingly, he is entitled to be awarded the CIB for that action and it would be in the interest of justice to do so at this time.

2.  Additionally, he is also entitled to have his records corrected to show that he was awarded the AGCM, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and three bronze service stars to be worn on his already awarded VSM.

BOARD VOTE:

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the CIB effective 21 June 1969 while serving in the rank of PFC and to add the AGCM, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and three bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM to his DD Form 214.

2. The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014490





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014490



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003376C070206

    Original file (20050003376C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Purple Heart. This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the RVNCM and by showing that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090955C070212

    Original file (2003090955C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his awards of the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and two bronze service stars to denote his campaign participation. The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Purple Heart, the CIB, the AGCM and two bronze service stars; however, they were not included on his DD Form 214 at the time of his release from active duty (REFRAD). There is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087598C070212

    Original file (2003087598C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect awards of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year, qualifies for award of the AGCM. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004732C070206

    Original file (20050004732C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s medical records are not present in the available records. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 6 June 1966 through 17 April 1968. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the GCMDL, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091247C070212

    Original file (2003091247C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the evidence does not clearly establish the date the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, documents contained in his records that are dated as early as 16 August 1969 and all the way through the date of his REFRAD, indicate his rank as that of a sergeant. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 28 November 1967 through 13 August 1970. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001479

    Original file (20080001479.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was subsequently awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal – First Class (RVNCAHM-FC) Unit Citation during the period he was assigned to the unit. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006660

    Original file (20130006660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 July 1967 through 16 May 1969 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was awarded the BSM and ARCOM and there is no evidence to show that his unit was awarded the MUC during the period he served with the unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083623C070212

    Original file (2003083623C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded or that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the Purple Heart is not present in this case, the Board finds that the statements submitted by three former members of the applicant's unit at the time, of which one was the first sergeant at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011791

    Original file (20090011791.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He had served 2 years and 10 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and his marksmanship awards. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the CIB effective 23 October 1969 and the AGCM for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058293C070421

    Original file (2001058293C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record fails to clearly show that the applicant was wounded/injured as a result of enemy action. Therefore, he is entitled to be awarded those medals and to have his records corrected accordingly. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.