Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014298
Original file (20090014298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 February 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014298 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was a "Vietnam Era" veteran.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not state he was a "Vietnam Era" veteran.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  With parental consent, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on
12 July 1971, he completed training, and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following:

	a.  advancement to the rank/grade of private first class (E-3)/E-3 on
19 November 1971 with a reduction to private (PV2)/E-2 on 15 June 1971;

	b.  award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar; and 

	c.  overseas service in Germany for 5 months and 8 days.

4.  On 21 July 1972, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations-Discharge-Unfitness and Unsuitability) for unsuitability with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he served 1 year and 10 days of creditable active service with 5 months and 8 days of foreign service (Germany). It also shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal.

6.  The term "era" refers to a historical period that has meaning only after the fact and varies depending on how and when it is used.  As an example for the purpose of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits, Title 38, U. S. Code defines the "Vietnam Era" as a period of war from 28 February 1961 through 7 May 1975, in the case of a veteran who served in the Republic of Vietnam, and from 5 August 1964 through 7 May 1975, in all other cases.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) as amended provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Current practice and that of the recent past has provided that a period of hostile fire/
imminent danger pay be shown in the "Remarks" block of the DD Form 214.  These entries are location specific.  There is no provision to show service within an "era."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 does not state he was a "Vietnam Era" veteran.

2.  The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for service during specific periods, in the applicant's case between 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974.  Therefore, the applicant's award of the National Defense Service Medal reflects that he served during a portion of what is commonly referred to as the "Vietnam Era."

3.  However, there is no provision for including the fact that a Soldier served during a particular "era" on the DD Form 214.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014298



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014298



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011838

    Original file (20110011838.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Silver Star, Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, and his other authorized awards be listed on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 38 (Record of Assignments) * service in Vietnam with A Company, 1st Battalion, 61st Infantry, 1st Brigade, 5th Infantry Division from 27 December 1970 through 29 July 1971 * service with D Company, 17th Infantry from 30 July through 26 October 1971 * conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018112

    Original file (20090018112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (All periods of Service)) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized to wear the * Bronze Star Medal * Defense Meritorious Service Medal * Meritorious Service Medal * Air Medal (7th Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Army Service Ribbon * Overseas Service Ribbon * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (7th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016721

    Original file (20100016721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the following: * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Distinguished Flying Cross 2. The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not list his Vietnam service medals which include the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Distinguished Flying Cross. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016252

    Original file (20130016252.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant served during two campaign periods and is authorized to wear two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal. At the time of the issuance of the applicant's Bronze Star Medal the orders number was not included on the award citation or certificate. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214; b. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001850

    Original file (20110001850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's military service records do not contain a DD Form 214 for the period of service from 20 January 1953 through 27 November 1955. The applicant's military personnel record does not contain any orders or other evidence showing he was recommended for or awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (2nd Award). The evidence of record shows that during the period of service: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013095

    Original file (20140013095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of the Combat Action Medal (correctly known as the Combat Action Badge), Combat Medical Badge, Army Good Conduct Medal, Cold War Certificate, Air Medal, and Bronze Star Medal. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002535

    Original file (20140002535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 August 1976 to show: * his status as a Vietnam era veteran vice post-Vietnam veteran * the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar 2. Therefore, there is no basis for entering any marksmanship qualification badges on the DD Form 214 documenting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002535

    Original file (20140002535 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 16 August 1976 to show: * his status as a Vietnam era veteran vice post-Vietnam veteran * the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar 2. Therefore, there is no basis for entering any marksmanship qualification badges on the DD Form 214 documenting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003030

    Original file (20140003030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * Air Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Valorous Unit Award 2. A review of his record shows that during the applicant's service in Vietnam, he participated in one campaign. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011467

    Original file (20090011467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) does not show the "National Guard/Reserve Service Commendation Medal" as an authorized award. Since Army Regulation 600-8-22 does not show the "National Guard/Reserve Service Commendation Medal" as an authorized award, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for this medal. The applicant did not serve a period of qualifying service for award of the American Defense Service Medal or the National Defense Service Medal.