Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014014
Original file (20090014014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014014 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he feels that he is due the Purple Heart because he performed many patrols in the DMZ (demilitarized zone) in Korea. He served with 2nd Battalion, 31st Infantry, 7thDivision in Korea in 1967 and his unit was always on the DMZ running patrols and it was a hostile fire zone in those days.  He got hurt in the DMZ area in May 1967.  When he was getting ready to go up to the "zone," he went down on his knee and it shifted in two places.  He had to have two operations on his leg and he was hospitalized for over 4 months in 1967.  He feels that he deserved this award and he would not put in a request for something that he did not feel he should have.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 
justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) in the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 on 26 September 1966, for 3 years.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman).  He served in Korea from 17 February 1967 to
20 October 1967 with Company B, 2nd Battalion, 31st Infantry, 7th Infantry Division.

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Item 38 (Record of Assignment), shows he was in a patient status from 23 October 1967 to 1 February 1968.  His records do not show the reason for his patient status.

4.  There is no entry in Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 showing he was wounded in action as a result of hostile enemy action.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 also contains no entry showing he was awarded the Purple Heart.

5.  There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart.

6.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 5 December 1969 at the expiration of his term of service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete is Reserve obligation.

7.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.

8.  The applicant was issued a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 28 March 1979, correcting several items on his 1969 DD Form 214, to include his date of entry on active duty.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's claim of entitlement to the Purple Heart was carefully considered.  However, by regulation, in order to support award of the Purple Heart, there must be evidence confirming that he was injured as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, that he was treated by medical personnel for his injury, and a record of this treatment made a matter of official record.

2.  The applicant’s contention have been noted; however, he has provided no evidence to show that he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action.  His records contains no orders or other documents confirming he was injured as a result of his participation in direct or indirect combat operations while serving in Korea.  The evidence also does not show he was ever recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority.  Therefore, absent corroborating evidence confirming the applicant's contentions (chain of command supporting letters, etc.), the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  Based on the evidence in this case, the applicant is not entitled to award of the Purple Heart and its addition to his DD Form 214.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014014



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014014



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008844C070205

    Original file (20060008844C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 December 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060008844 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016420

    Original file (20100016420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 29 December 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100016420 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant also requests that the Purple Heart be awarded to three other Soldiers from his unit who were also involved in the incident which led to his wounding. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records), paragraph 2-5, states the ABCMR staff will not act on an application for correction of the military records of service members or former service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002846C070206

    Original file (20050002846C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) and DD Form 214 with the separation date of 16 July 1995, does not show award of the Purple Heart. The Korea Defense Service Medal was authorized for service in Korea after 28 July 1954. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019458

    Original file (20130019458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received from friendly fire while on a combat mission. The applicant stated and the evidence of record supports that he received shrapnel wounds to his right shoulder and right leg while serving in Korea in April 1967 when another member of his unit discharged his weapon upon returning from a combat patrol. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089957C070403

    Original file (2003089957C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication in the PEB records which shows that the applicant's ankle injury was the result of hostile action. In the absence of evidence which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds or injuries, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020405

    Original file (20120020405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. However, award of the CIB is not supported by any verifiable documented evidence that shows he was personally engaged in active ground combat during his period of service in Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021919

    Original file (20110021919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he received two gunshot wounds (GSW) while in Korea. His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he completed 1 year, 6 months, and 24 days of creditable active military service, of which 6 months was foreign service. He indicated that he was stationed in Korea in 1969 on the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) patrolling the border (infantry) for about 8 to 9 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140007784

    Original file (AR20140007784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (1) An entry dated 12 December 1963 documents a right shoulder injury incurred in August 1963 that resulted in a painful shoulder with limited motion. A Statement of Hospitalization, dated 27 January 1964, shows he was hospitalized from 13 through 27 January 1964. c. A DA Form 8-275-3 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet), dated 27 January 1964, contains a partially-legible entry showing he was diagnosed with arthritis, right acromio-clavicular joint, "due to old [illegible] in July 63." ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012980

    Original file (20110012980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders in his records showing award of the Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows the applicant sustained injuries to his legs and arm as the result of a grenade explosion caused by "friendly fire."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013692C071108

    Original file (20060013692C071108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the absence of such evidence, there is insufficient basis to grant award of the Purple Heart in this case. Although the applicant did not file within the ABCMR’s statute of limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to timely file based on the fact there are no time limitations on requests for award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's...