Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013837
Original file (20090013837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090013837 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests corrections of his service record to show award of the Purple Heart (PH) he was awarded.

2.  The applicant states he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 20 May 1970 and as a result he was awarded the PH.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of General Orders Number 124, dated 21 May 1970, and a PH certificate in support his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's record shows he initially enlisted in the Regular Army on
13 February 1967.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 35K (Aviation Mechanic).  He served for 1 year, 6 months, and 20 days until being honorably discharged in the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 in order to accept a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) commissioned officer appointment.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 5 months and 24 days of overseas service in the RVN.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

3.  On 3 September 1968, the applicant was appointed a USAR second lieutenant and continued serving on active duty in that status.  He served on active duty an additional 5 years and 14 days until 16 September 1973, when he was honorably released from active duty, in the rank/grade of captain (CPT)/O-3. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows that during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (3 September 1968 - 16 September 1973) he completed two tours of duty in the RVN.  The first tour was from 27 September 1967 through 20 March 1968 and the second tour was from 18 September 1969 through 8 June 1970.  The DD Form 214 also shows he earned the AGCM, Army Aviation Badge, Air Medal, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, VSM, and the RVNCM with Device (1960).

4.  The applicant's record shows he continued to serve in the USAR and Army National Guard (ARNG) not on active duty in both an officer and enlisted status from 17 September 1973 through 1 December 1988, at which time he was honorably discharged from the ARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve.

5.  The applicant provides General Orders Number 124, issued by Headquarters, 91st Evacuation Hospital, dated 21 May 1970.  These orders awarded him the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 20 May 1970.  He also provides a PH certificate, dated 21 May 1970, which corroborates the information in the PH orders.

6.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Board staff reviewed the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster.  This revealed an entry that confirms the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 20 May 1970.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the PH he was awarded should be added to his record and DD Form 214 was carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  The evidence includes PH orders and certificate confirming the applicant was awarded the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 20 May 1970.  This information is corroborated by an entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, the official DA list of RVN casualties.  Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

_____x___  ____x____  _____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 September 1973 the Purple Heart and

   b.  providing him a corrected DD Form 214 that includes this award.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013837



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090013837



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007943

    Original file (20090007943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 11 February 1968 through 9 February 1969; and again from 5 October 1970 through 4 October 1971. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his 4 October 1971 DD Form 214 by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010325

    Original file (20120010325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments and his record is void of derogatory information or a unit commander disqualification that would have precluded award of the AGCM. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010411

    Original file (20120010411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following three campaigns: * Vietnam Defense Campaign (8 March - 24 December 1965) * Vietnam Counteroffensive (25 December 1965 - 30 June 1966) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II (1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967) c. Paragraph 6-3 states an oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the PH. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012393C080407

    Original file (20070012393C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any medical treatment record that shows the applicant was ever treated for a combat- related wound or injury while serving in the RVN. No PH orders pertaining to the applicant were in this file. Therefore, absent any evidence showing he was wounded in action, or that he was ever awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support award of the PH in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009964

    Original file (20120009964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and did not receive the PH. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 13 June 1968 through 14 January 1970 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087100C070212

    Original file (2003087100C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents showing that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was ever recommended for the PH. The evidence of record provides no confirmation that the applicant was ever wounded in action or that he was ever...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003326

    Original file (20080003326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 May 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080003326 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. These orders awarded the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 15 March 1968. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to award the applicant the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) for being wounded in action in the RVN on 1 June 1968, and to add these awards to his record and separation document at this time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000294

    Original file (20080000294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003027

    Original file (20090003027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the PH on 10 May 1968; three Army Commendation (ARCOM) medals with "V" (Valor) Device for heroism on 31 January, 9 May, and 16 August 1968; and the BSM on 17 November 1968. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 9 May 1968, as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20, the ARCOM with "V" Device orders for 9 May 1968 on file in his OMPF, an entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, and by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013351

    Original file (20090013351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should reflect a second award of the PH and he was never awarded the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) as he should have been. Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 contains one entry showing he was wounded in action in the RVN on 28 April 1968, when he received a fragment wound to his left leg. However, there are no record entries or orders confirming the applicant was wounded in action a second time, or that he was ever recommended for...